9/11 Victims' Kin Seek Release Of Secret Documents

Source: bostonherald.com


Three families who lost loved ones in the 9/11 terrorist attacks head to court today to plead with a federal judge to release a million pages of documents detailing the mass murder of nearly 3,000 Americans.

Those secret papers, one Bay State family member told the Herald, are “so bad you won’t believe it.”

“It was out control,” Paul Keating, 45, said of security on Sept. 11, 2001, including at Logan International Airport in Boston where two ill-fated jets left on a collision course with infamy.

“My mother went through the most public murder you could imagine . . . and I’ve been putting up with this crap for seven years,” Keating said of his refusal to settle his case out of court.

Keating’s 72-year-old mother, Barbara, a Framingham native, died aboard American Airlines [AMR] Flight 11.

Keating is making legal history today, along with the families of Mark Bavis, 31, and Sara Low, 28, by asking Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein in Federal District Court in Manhattan to lift the order keeping all the evidence hidden.

Low was a Boston-based flight attendant on Flight 11; Bavis of West Newton, a passenger on United Airlines Flight 175. Both jets left Logan with hijackers on board and were slammed into the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers.

“Sept. 11 should not have happened,” said attorney Donald A. Migliori, whose firm represents all three families.

He said the secret papers include depositions of former Massport Executive Director Virginia Buckingham and former Logan security chief Joe Lawless.

If the documents are released, plans are in the works to make a public archive.

As for the three families, they vow to hold out for public trials next year - refusing any share of $7 billion in secret settlements to expose how 19 terrorists brought a nation to its knees.

Contradictions & Distortions................

One of NORAD’s "air sovereignty" tasks before 9/11 was watching foreign aircraft fly over American airspace. NORAD before 1997 said of such foreign aircraft, "Today NORAD, which monitors some 7,000 crossings of our airspace daily..."

The quote above is contradicted by the following 2008 quote from NORAD, "Since the tragic events of 9/11, NORADs role which previously was outward-looking now includes monitoring airspace within North America."

See the 5 articles on NORAD at www.DNotice.org

Dean Jackson/Editor-in-Chief DNotice.org
Washngton, DC

Pray They Get the "SECRETS" Released.

Paul Keating:
“My mother went through the most public murder you could imagine . .

Yes, A Snuff Film for All

.. and I’ve been putting up with this crap for seven years,”

You have a lot of people on your side.

NPR sez.....

I heard NPR treat this story a few moments ago. The reporter - with one eye half-opened and facing the wrong direction - tells us that these documents may contain the answer to "the biggest mystery of 9/11" (I was breathless and nearly dropped the cereal box). The Biggest Mystery is (fanfare, please): How hijackers were able to get through airport security.
I have never heard of this being a mystery to anyone. Was this reporter born on a "reality" show, after September, 2001?
Even the Official conspiracy theory had their hijackers bringing only "box cutters" aboard. I have a friend who traveled with his handgun on planes, and was allowed to do so as long as the bullets were in a separate box. Now that's just stupid policy, not a mystery. Box cutters less so.
As far as mysteries go - and just for a start on a very long list - , did the reporter not consider the NORAD stand-down as qualifying as a bigger mystery with far greater implications?
His choice of "biggest mystery of 9/11" is the biggest mystery to me: Why does the reporter consider such a straw dog to be some sort of linchpin to help explain the whole story?
It is incredible that NPR is so blatantly ignorant of the true mysteries of 9/11 which need to be answered. They are funded by us to be PUBLIC radio, not corporate asscovering Faux News.

PBS and NPR are now compromised...go alternative!

PBS and NPR were founded with good intentions in that most funding came from the public tax base to support nuetral or unbiased programming. Please remember that Bill Moyers has had to create independence from PBS in the last few years.

PBS and NPR certainly started off really well...and that ORIGINAL MYTH CONTINUES TODAY...especially with those still snoring in the "GREAT GRAYHAIRED NAP" that started in the 60s-70s.

Over the years, the percentage of operating funds for both PBS and NPR were slowly swapped from the public domain to the corporations, and far more ominously, to the rich or upper class donators who have a severe agenda to execute.

As PBS and NPR sit today, if something politicaly uncomfortable is developed or aired, and it bothers the few wealthy groups in this country, they call up EN MASSE and threaten to hold back their donations unless PBS and NPR present what is comfortable to them. And programming changes IMMEDIATELY!

DOTS will need to be connected here...

One only needs to look closely at, or track, the on air output of WGBH-TV and WBUR-FM radio in Boston [ BOTH are a major original program originator for NPR and PBS], and compare what the donations flow is when programming swings into anything pro-Palestinian, and or, anything critical to those who clandestinely support Greater Israel.

And if you think that these "alleged" public broadcasting corporations are not affected, or in reverse, have effect upon, Chomsky and Dershowitz at MIT and Harvard respectfully, then you have not connected very many DOTS at all.

PBS and NPR need to be publically funded ENTIRELY...or completely eliminated from the airwaves because they ARE NOT what they portend to be.

As each media and programming outlet sits now, they have morphed into being tools of the same "ruling class" that pulled of 9/11/2001.

Sorry Sesame Street fans, but your old network as been HACKED...just like most oother things!

But we are exposing this more and more every day.

Did you all know that Derschowitz forced the Democratic Party to exclude President Jimmy Carter from speaking at Obama's convention in Denver. Carter has been outwardly critical of Israel's behavior regarding Palestine.

And that Obama was created at Columbia and finished off at Harvard Law...

The ruling class couldn't run another "pasty white guy" for Prez...so they created a "pasty black guy" and elected him...

DOT...DOT...DOT...DOT...can you say Rahm Emanuel?

Slowly it all makes complete sense...starting with the three activists killed in Mississsippi in the 60s when they were supporting the civil rights movement...DOT-DOT-DOT...

Love, Peace and Progress...with


Robin Hordon

Well said.

You are absolutely correct.

Presenting itself as investigative and clearheaded, NPR news may be (stylistically) worlds away from the hype and lies of Faux News. Yet I realize this is about like saying that very dark is still lighter than pitch black. Editorially, there is very little difference between the two, where reportage on critical issues is often vacuous if not completely absent. And alternatives on radio are fast becoming extinct on air. Where I live, I can pick up no less than six simultaneous broadcasts of Douche Lintball, lots of God Radio and sports and blather music, and not ONE alternative or Liberal station. How stupid do they want us to be? (Rhetorical Q, of course.)

Those of us who like democracy cling to the vestiges of government policy which at least pretend to still serve the citizens and is not simply another handy tool for corporate greed. And yet practically every "news" story on NPR is branded by the likes of GE.

This is why it is absolutely imperative that ALL of us carefully watch out for and soundly prevent abrogations of speech and access on the internet. This is now the main channel for reality. No laws or corporations should shut up, control, or slow down truth!

How many were on watch lists?

The matter of getting past airport security could plausibly be treated as a 'mystery' if related to that of the presence of some of the purported hijackers on watch lists as potential or known terrorists (whether accurately so or fabricated, in the prior construction of the 9/11 'legend,' we will leave aside for the moment). In fact, the 'mystery' there isn't only that these individuals were (per the official story) not prevented from boarding those planes on that day, but that they were able to enter the country in the first place with apparent ease.

These mysteries then begin to clear up as one proceeds from such questions to learn about the history of false-flag operations, the counterror war game exercises that were going on, etc.

no truthers haveposted at boston herald under this story

go look

Missing Links

According to the film 'Missing Links' airport security was by this Israeli company.


I don't remember reading about them before. So if anyone knows more or otherwise - feel free to enlighten...

truthers are responding strongly on that site

Seems like their are a few informed people submitting posts on the Boston Herald comments section.

Jon thanks for the update!

It is absolutely necessary we stay in touch with the victims plight for justice!


Regards John

9/11 24/7 UNTIL JUSTICE!!