Be Aware Of Disinformation Being Promoted By Alfred Webre

I saw this posted today.

Just making you aware of this. Please don't ask me why this is considered to be "disinformation." Thanks.

I agree Jon

I have met Mr Webre personally.

Deception is deception no matter what the sugar coating. He MAY BELIEVE in the Hocus-Pocus he says, but that does not diminish the deceptive elements of his message.

The sad truth is that TRUTH is hard to come by.

The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance.

Thomas Jefferson.

That is also the price of Truth.
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Have you?

If anything ever looks like it's being paid for by the CIA, then this is. Since you met the guy, I'd like to know what your assessment is?

I mean, "deceptive elements"? Isn't it glaringly obvious that every single letter of the article is, from start to end, bullshit ? I mean, this is really overkill. This is very obviously designed to invoke outrage, and is designed to connect us to outright mentally sick bullshit by association.

I think the best thing to do is to ignore it, because sending it around to other activists in "disgust" would only serve to amplify, provide a podium and further strengthen this attempt on the truth movement.

On the other hand, you could do the truth movement a favor and approach this man and have him fess up who paid/requested him to write this crap. It could then be turned into something at least remotely useful.

full court press.

It appears they are attacking the 911 Truth from several angles at once. I deduce from this that we must be making headway. People are seeing through the bullshit, so they are shoveling in some fresh pies. I hate these bastards.

Classic disinfo of the truly wacky variety

This article indicates to me just how desperate certain people are to discredit the 9/11 truth movement.

Pathetic, I hope I never cross paths with Mr. Webre again or I will give him a rather large piece of my mind.

I fully expect Dr. Deagle to pop up soon, with something equally ridiculous.

Thanks for posting this, Jon.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

"Pathetic, I hope I never

"Pathetic, I hope I never cross paths with Mr. Webre again or I will give him a rather large piece of my mind."

I know what you mean.

Delusions and self-deception.

The sad truth of the matter is Webre may actually believe in some of the drivel he is spewing out.

Regardless. Error is Error. Crazy is Crazy. Deceived and Deceiving.
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it


Main reason I posted this was for when it is used against us, I can post this declaration of disinformation. But now, I'm moving on.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?


The smart thing to do is to preempt it. Thanks for this though Jon, because many lessons can be learned from studying disinformation. I guess Webre has been doing it for a while:

“Fellow Citizens... 9/11 was a false flag operation by an international war crimes racketeering organisation to provide a pretext to engage in a genocidal and ecocidal depleted uranium bombing of central Asia, Afghanistan and Iraq in order to secure vast oil and uranium reserves; to roll out a terror-based national security state system worldwide and ... to implement the final stages of a world depopulation policy.” There are two more “false flag” operations in the pipeline, he says. The first is the war against asteroids, the second the “war against the evil aliens”.


Why is this disinformation?


Jesus, downvoter!

Have a sense of humor.

Ha Ha.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

I met Alfred Webre at the

I met Alfred Webre at the Vancouver 9/11 Truth conference, He's genuine and very committed , a gentle spirit with a big heart.
I don't subscribe to his views regarding 9/11 at all but support his right to his opinion. Alfred's views just like Alex Jones and Dr Bill Deagle should only be taken with a grain of salt as all broadcasters tend to push the envelope on truth for ratings. With Alfred he generally believes this far out stuff... Check out my partners web site : Leaving Alex JONESTOWN, She (a non 9/11 Truther) has made it a career debunking the things said by Alex Jones. I don't always agree with her opinions but she researches carefully her exposing Alex Jones his inaccurate statements.


Just a cursory read of the blog you've recommended reveals just how 'careful' the research is:

"No one needs to make 9/11 Truth look bad. Truthers do that all on their own. Even many of the more "mainstream" Truthers insist upon associating with Holocaust deniers, making bizarre and insupportable accusations, and ranting about Zionism or Freemasons. And let's not even go into the Truthers who demand full disclosure of the government's role in reverse-engineering UFO technology, or the Truthers who subscribe to fundamentalist Christian lunacy, or the Truthers who think that zero point energy is being suppressed, or the Truthers who freak out at the mere mention of the word "tapwater"."

Yet more disinfo tactics, extensively described by Reprehensor in the article "On Disinformation and Damaging Associations"

Even though I strongly disagree with Alex Jones on many topics, I can tell you are mixing with the wrong crowd, Richard. Excuse me while I take your assessment of Alfred Webre with a rather large grain of salt.

(With friends like that, who needs enemies, right?)

I have more enemies who are 9/11 truthers than non truthers

That's okay Snow Crash, I appreciate your feedback,
The author of " Leaving Alex JonesTown" is also not only my friend but also my companion of 8 years. And although she is not a committed 9/11 truther (too bad for me) she does stand by me and our 9/11 truth friends as they do with her respectfully.
She also agrees we need to re investigate 9/11 with a criminal investigation . She as a skeptic (as we all should be ) and those like her who have never questioned 9/11 are the ones we want to meet with during activism in Edmonton through 9/11 "civil" information actions.

We are not a cult that proclaims " WAKE-UP and Believe Sheep" , " 9/11 was an inside job!" but rather we leave it up to individuals to decide for themselves where they stand on the issues of 9/11 and respect their position, We provide them with the news and information the media covers-up relating to 9/11.

I don't think I need to say anything more about Alfred.
A grain of sand is all I know of this gentle person. If Vancouver had him as a guest at the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference, He can't be all bad. He's just into other things! series on 9/11 by Alfred Webre

Hi! I am Alfred Webre.

For some reason, the posts on about my contributions to the 9/11 Truth movement are consistently paranoid and fear-driven.

They are not reality-driven.

I suggest that fair-minded students of 9/11 read and study the recent series of articles on 9/11 by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd

You can find them at:

U.S. attorney or district attorney can prosecute Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld for murder on 9/11

Memo to U.S. Congress: prima facie evidence that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld committed treason on 9/11

Scientist: Directed energy weapons turned World Trade Center into nanoparticles on 9/11

Secret DARPA time travel program may hold key to understanding the deep politics of 9/11

9/11 Truth & Reconciliation - Restorative Justice

In Light and cooperation, Alfred


Time to stop in-fighting.

The opinions of Alex Jones, Jim Fetzer, Kevin Barrett and Alfred Weber need to be examined.

We have been lied to by mainstream media for years and we continue to buy their product.

Opinions are like arm-pits; everyone has a couple; some stink.

I am blocked by a local radio station and the city paper refuses my letters to the editor.

Focus on the demand for an investigation.

We can sort out who was right/wrong later.

What's with

the sudden influx of people who remind us of the so-called 'importance' of disinfo? The 'opinions' of Fetzer and Webre don't need to be examined at all. They're utter clowns; I'm sorry, but that's just the way the cookie crumbles.

Barrett, I don't find particularly interesting, and Jones, well, to each his own.

Less than a few hours ago, somebody posted a link to no plane material. One must wonder if this disruptive activity is increasing on 911blogger because 9/11 approaches?

The funny thing is that I read the High Strangness Book

A friend of mine wrote the introduction and I really don't remember it having any significant 911 info. I could be wrong because some one loaned me the book so I will have to check with him about the specific 911 info if there was any. In any event maybe it's not all such bad news because the real info about the twin towers building 7, and phillip z are in the body of the article on the link. My friend who wrote the intro to the book is one of the top UFO researchers in the world and has written The History of UFO's and The National Security State volumes I and II. He has taken a lot of flak for his intro and association with High Strangenes and the author. However, he has spent considerable time with the author in her french chalet and assures me that very smart ,serious people are there doing some amazing work. He is a 911 truther and gives great talks now on 911 and the NWO etc. He is a history scholar and was pursing two simultaneous PHD's when he came across some military documents about UFO's. In any event we have discussed how hard it is for the average person to get their head around 911 much less UFO's and aliens etc.

Here's the latest on this !

The guy is a train wreck with no respect within the UFO movement. He uses wild attention grabbing headlines and stories to make money! He gets 10 cents a click! The high stangeness book makes very little mention of 911. No where near what the article seems to imply. My friend had written an article reflecting his honest assessment of the work the author and her physicist husband and others were doing. They asked him if they could use it for the intro to their book, and for that he has paid a price. He does not believe that they are lying and stands by his assessment. However the Alfred Webre piece may very well not be deliberate disinfo just the rantings of someone trying to turn clicks into cash.