My open email to Randi Rhodes regarding my alleged "sandbagging" of the VP on blog-based nano-thermite rumor
I just called the Randi Rhodes show when I heard her give the number out, and, unexpectedly, got right on the air. I did not have my thoughts as collected as I would have liked and I was a little bit startled with how quickly things got snarky and snarly. So, I apologize if I was not that focused. But it seemed like it got some of the info out and got a good discussion going about journalism, blogging and "sandbagging." So, here is my open email in response to Randi. I have also told her that I will keep her responses private if she so desires.
p.s. if someone can grab that audio on the replay, that would be great.
I didn't "sandbag" the Vice President. I had an important scientific paper with crucial implications for truth, justice and peace in this country and around the world, and I asked him what any paid journalist with a little respect for self, reality and country should have already asked him. I didn't interrupt. I waited for the right moment after the photo-ops and presented it fairly clearly and with as much modulated calmness as I could muster about such a serious issue. It's not like I'm picking on Biden or the Obama administration either. When the CIA boss Hayden came to town last fall we confronted him (http://www.911blogger.com/node/17853). Should I have been more polite and known my place and not "sandbagged" one of the chief operators helping move us into a post-constitutional USA?
And I didn't sandbag you. I just heard you announce your number as I was doing other things and decided to call to let you know and get your take on this. I'll keep you on my email list in the future if you want notification of what is in my span of focus in the moment. In terms of the paper, the samples it is based upon all have their chain of custody attested to and signed off on, so this is legally admissable. But more importantly, this is about reclaiming our reality from the vast and deep deception of the post-9/11 world. Anyone with a modicum of intellectual and moral integrity and fortitude, looked at Building 7 coming down and already knew that those buildings were blown up and that 9/11 was, thus, a black op or inside job of sorts.
For you to side with yellow journalists extraordinaire, paid propagandists such as the Hearst-owned "Popular Mechanics" over the dedicated work of thouands of scientists, architects and engineers (www.ae911truth.org), military men and women (www.patriotsquestion911.com) and tireless citizen investigators is way off. It's time to come back in touch with we the people and to reclaim your reality. We don't need another "Commission," although I am fully in support of the NYCAN ballot initiative, to be able to distuinguish truth from lies. And no, it is not good enough to say there are valid questions, if you are unwilling to face some of the serious answers.
I appreciate your desire to help out in term of perceived credibility. You are right about some of your perception that some of the 9/11 truth movement is over-zealous with beliefs while being under-zealous with fact-checking. However, many of us are dedicated to being as thorough and unspeculative as possible while at the same time asserting what we know. I have presented information to my congresspeople over the years. I got it together to present some of the best evidence I coul find to numerous federal judges here in Los Angeles (http://www.911blogger.com/node/10746), so it's not like I just grabbed some factoid off a blog or a movie on google and ran up to the Vice President and said "what faction of the illuminati are you apart of?"
I do think you misrepresented what I did and what I am about on the air today. I would appreciate some response around this, because you spoke pretty negatively about what I did in a way that this important topic and my conduct as an individual do not deserve. The Secret Service agent who saw the way we handled ourselves and the question we asked saluted us and said "good job" to us. I imagine you could at least portray our work fairly. I would love to further discus this with you, because this a crucial piece to preparing the way for a beautiful, abundant future, and you are a crucial voice, and we need you to stand with truth and the people and not with the lies and the liars.