Dr. Steven Jones at UC Davis-May1, 2009

Dr. Steven Jones presents important features from the paper, "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe"
This talk is powerful and challenges the un-peer reviewed science of NIST, as that agency of the government tries to explain the collapse of building 7 during the 9/11 event.

Beautiful presention! WTC Physics / Science 101

I am all grins! Great presentation! Thanks for the full video post! Thank you Dr Jones!

WHAT YOU ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW ABOUT 9/11: Building 7 - Gone in 7
July 11 - Plano, TX http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/2744396/
FOX Channel 4 Dallas
http://community2.myfoxdfw.com/_911-Truth-The-evidence-is-clear/audio/46...

Dr. Jones

One of my all time favorite heroes.

The%20AmerosQuantcast


The%20AmerosQuantcast

What a great educator Stephen Jones is...

You just can't thank someone like Dr. Jones enough.

Agreed. "Beautiful presentation". But since I am very familiar with Dr. Jones work, I paid most attention to the way Jones conveyed this information to his audience, presenting each subtle tid-bit of detail in such a way as to capture attention and make total, simple sense. He can anticipate the little mental struggles a crowd has, and make it all immediately clear. He can touch upon implication without getting off-subject. What a practiced hand! He taught university physics for 20 years and it shows.

What a smashing fist in such a velvet glove! This guy is a real hero, folks. I just hope he knows how much everyone appreciates the level of talent and skill he brings to 911 Truth. Dare I say we'd be nothing but a tribe of indians with a Medicine Man without Steve Jones.

Rock on, Teach!

Question for Dr. Jones

1. Is it possible based upon your research to determine if there were two types of nano-thermites used?
For example one the apparent non-explosive thermite that created the flowing metal from the upper floors and the other nano-thermite used to violently separate the steel members via explosions?

2. In order to use a conventional fire based, gravity driven collapse excuse, would it be a necessity to weaken the structure to the point of initiation via non-explosive nano-thermite cutting as in the flowing molten metal observed and then to cloud the violent nano-thermite explosions using the collapse of the building itself?

Thank you for your response and great presentation.

"I would imagine that if you took the top expert in that type of work and gave him the assignment of bringing these buildings down with explosives, I would bet that he could do it." -1993-John Skilling, Head Structural Engineer WTC Towers

Thank you

.

Is this the version Reprehensor

mentioned he would front page at http://911blogger.com/node/20038?

Is this the same presentation, but from a different angle?

videographers

I'm not sure. There were 3-4 videographers there that night including myself and Dylan Avery. One presentation was shown on YouTube.

Bonnie Faulkner will broadcast an edited version of this one on Wednesday on Guns and Butter.

It was disturbing to hear Steven's personal stories about how he has been threatened and dogged by a certain individual. Steve remains gracious and professional in spite of it. Pressure the government to allow peer review of NIST's science. It's crap.

Towards the end of this presentation is Steven's endorsement of NYCCAN.

John

Intimidation

I heard of that intimidation in an earlier presentation by Prof. Jones, and I never forgot it, I think it's good he brings it up, because these people and their ...well...fascist...(ties to DHS) tactics need to be exposed. This man even claimed he was behind Jones' early retirement didn't he? It really upsets and angers me that somebody as civil and intelligent as prof. Jones would be the subject of such intimidation. The smart thing to do would be to involve as many scientists as possible in the scanning of this dust, as this helps lessen the political burden by spreading it. I don't want prof. Jones to carry this weight alone, good thing prof. Harrit is so outspoken as well.

My god, what happened to the western world.....

Yes lets find out where it came from?

Answers are waiting to be uncovered and the dust is whispering their names!

Bravo Dr Jones can't wait until November www.thehardevidence.com.au

9/11 24/7 UNTIL JUSTICE!!
www.truthaction.org.au

Thank you for comments and encouragement.

I was asked:
"1. Is it possible based upon your research to determine if there were two types of nano-thermites used?
For example one the apparent non-explosive thermite that created the flowing metal from the upper floors and the other nano-thermite used to violently separate the steel members via explosions?"

Regarding "the apparent non-explosive thermite that created the flowing metal from the upper floors" of the South Tower, captured on several videos as an orange-flow, this fits our experimental data for the molten eutectic of iron plus sulfur -- from a Thermite plus sulfur mixture. This is commonly called thermate (not necessarily thermate TH-3) -- and is an incendiary form of thermite.

Unlike ordinary thermite or thermate, "nanothermite" is characterized by ultra-fine grains of at least one of the constituents, Fe2O3 or aluminum. In the red/gray chips, the red layer shows Fe2O3 in grains about 100 nanometers across, fitting the requirement for nanothermite. And yes, nanothermite is typically tailored to be an explosive. As I explained at UC-Davis, there appear to be TWO forms of thermitic material on 9/11/2001:
1) thermite plus sulfur, an incendiary, and
2) nanothermite, an explosive.

"2. In order to use a conventional fire based, gravity driven collapse excuse, would it be a necessity to weaken the structure to the point of initiation via non-explosive nano-thermite cutting as in the flowing molten metal observed and then to cloud the violent nano-thermite explosions using the collapse of the building itself?"

This fits the observations, yes.

"Thank you for your response and great presentation."

Thank you.

I should clarify that the initial fumbling came because the first speaker (Janette MacKinlay, she gave a great short talk) used my computer, so I needed to remove her PPT and get mine going and there was a little glitch in making the switch.
John -- if you could take out this first part, or some of it, I think it would be better...

And yes, I strongly support the NYC CAN initiative. The great goal is justice, not just a scientific description of precisely HOW the WTC buildings were brought down. Justice will require a public investigation with subpoena power (IMO) -- and NYC CAN pursues just such a goal.

Dr. Jones

............. Your awesome! Your integrity speaks volumes of the man that you are. Thank you sir!

Thank you, Wisdom,

and all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_sCQk5s3sw provides an interesting commentary, between Ron Paul and Glenn Beck... Sounds like Beck is warming up finally...