Support 911Blogger


WeAreChangeLA confronts 9/11 criminal 'General' Richard Myers

On May 20, 2009, General Richard Myers was at the Nixon Library in Yorba Linda, California to give a talk and a book signing. Bruno Bruhwiler and Jeremy Rothe-Kushel of WeAreChangeLA were there to call into question the 'General's' credibility when it came to talking about 9/11 and threats to the nation. Watch the following 3 videos, created by Paul Wittenberger, to see what happened. All I'll tell you for now is that towards the end of his speech, Myers said, "I'm sorry about the disturbance. If I had anything to do with causing that, I apologize." Well, I guess you could consider that the small step of a criminal towards owning up to and doing penance for his participation in treason, mass murder and war crimes.

Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0y3SeRpQejM

Part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbMPaPK7e1Y

Part 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15QrS0vIpus

Technically...

He's not a "criminal"... yet. He hasn't perjured himself under oath... yet.

He's just a "suspect" at this point, along with Cheney, and a shit load of others.

The way those goons were on Jeremy is similar to the way that the Nazis "convinced" their political opponents that the Nazi way was the only way.

Brave stuff, WACLA.

(Myers is obviously still very much in the public eye, and thus, a public figure. His characterization as a "criminal" may be inaccurate, but he's out there pimping books and seeking attention. Well, he got some. I recommend to WACLA that in the future they characterize Myers as a "suspect", not a criminal, for clarity's sake.)

Promoted from Vice-Chairman to Chairman three days after 9/11

Quotes
2000

“The American military is built to dominate all phases and mediums of combat. We must acknowledge that our way of war requires superiority in all mediums of conflict, including space. Thus, we must plan for, and execute to win, space superiority.” [Foreign Service Journal, 4/2001]

http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=richard_b._myers

Shortly Before 9:00 a.m. September 11, 2001: Acting Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Learns of First Crash from Television

According to his own account, Air Force General Richard Myers, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, sees reports of the first WTC crash on television. Myers is acting chairman of the US military during the 9/11 crisis because Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Army General Henry Shelton is flying across the Atlantic for a NATO meeting in Europe. [ABC News, 9/11/2002; American Forces Press Service, 9/8/2006] Myers has a 9 o’clock appointment with Senator Max Cleland (D) in one of the Senate office buildings. He is heading into this meeting and sees a television in Cleland’s outer office showing the burning North Tower, with the commentator suggesting it has been hit by an airplane. [MSNBC, 9/11/2002] Myers later recalls, “They thought it was a small plane or something like that.” [Armed Forces Radio And Television Service, 10/17/2001; American Forces Press Service, 10/23/2001]

He says, “And we’re standing around saying, ‘What in the world happened?’ I remember the day being beautiful. I said, ‘How could a pilot be that stupid, to hit a tower? I mean, what’—but then you think, ‘Well, whatever.’” So he goes ahead and walks into the meeting, and is with Cleland at the time the second tower is hit (see (Shortly After 9:03 a.m.) September 11, 2001). [Council on Foreign Relations, 6/29/2006] On several occasions, Cleland will confirm that Myers had this meeting with him. [US Congress, 9/13/2001; CNN, 11/20/2001; Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 6/16/2003] But counterterrorism “tsar” Richard Clarke seems to contradict this account.

He claims that, when he joins a video teleconference shortly after arriving at the White House, he sees Myers on screen, indicating that Myers is at the Pentagon rather than with Cleland (see (9:10 a.m.) September 11, 2001). [Clarke, 2004, pp. 1-3

(Shortly After 9:03 a.m.) September 11, 2001: Myers Learns of Second Attack But Does Not Head Back to Pentagon; Reports Are Contradictory

According to some reports, acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Richard Myers entered a meeting on Capitol Hill with Senator Max Cleland (D) just minutes before the second plane hit the World Trade Center (see Shortly Before 9:00 a.m. September 11, 2001). There are confused accounts of when Myers learns of this second attack, and what he does in response. Myers later tells NBC News, “[S]omewhere in the middle of that meeting, they came in and said the second tower has been hit… and I think that’s when we figured out something—that America or at least the World Trade Center is under attack.” He adds, “And then I left the office,” and says that NORAD Commander Ralph Eberhart then calls him. [MSNBC, 9/11/2002] In testimony on September 13, 2001, he similarly states, “[A]fter the second tower was hit, I spoke to the commander of NORAD, General Eberhart.” [US Congress, 9/13/2001] In a speech in 2006, Myers says that after the second attack occurs, “The meeting was over very quickly.” [Council on Foreign Relations, 6/29/2006]

He tells CNN, “[W]hen the second target was hit, we knew something was up, so we rushed back to the Pentagon.” [CNN, 4/15/2003] Yet in an interview five weeks after 9/11, he claims, “Nobody informed us” when the second tower was hit, “But when we came out [of our meeting], that was obvious.” [Armed Forces Radio And Television Service, 10/17/2001; American Forces Press Service, 10/23/2001] And, according to several accounts, he does not leave Capitol Hill until around the time the Pentagon is hit, which is more than 30 minutes after the second attack happens (see (Shortly After 9:37 a.m.) September 11, 2001). In a speech in 2003, Max Cleland recalls, “Gen. Myers bolted from his seat. We rushed into an adjoining office as we saw on TV the second plane slam into the second tower. Gen. Myers rushed out of my office, headed for the Pentagon.

At that moment, the Pentagon was hit.” [Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 6/16/2003] But on a couple of other occasions, Cleland says he is still meeting with Myers in his office at the time the Pentagon is hit. [US Congress, 9/13/2001; CNN, 11/20/2001] Contradicting both Cleland and Myers, counterterrorism “tsar” Richard Clarke later claims that when he joins a video teleconference shortly after the time of the second attack, he can see Myers on screen, meaning Myers is at the Pentagon at that time rather than on Capitol Hill (see (9:10 a.m.) September 11, 2001). [Clarke, 2004, pp. 1-3]

October 17, 2001: JCS Chairman Myers Says He Hadn’t Thought of 9/11-Type Scenario

Gen. Richard Myers, acting Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman on 9/11, says of 9/11, “You hate to admit it, but we hadn’t thought about this.” He was promoted from Vice-Chairman to Chairman three days after 9/11. [American Forces Press Service, 10/23/2001]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You could say I'm suspicious.

All of us are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9/11 Wargames
Pentagon Acknowledges Four Wargames on 9/11

http://www.wanttoknow.info/050317wargames911

"[The wargames] enhanced our ability to respond, given that NORAD didn't have the overall responsibility for responding to the attacks that day."
-- Pentagon Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Richard Myers, 3/11/05

Amalgam Virgo 01 - Wargame from June 1-2-2001

Wargames on 9/11: (sub-clip) Dick Cheney ran the wargames?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9-ZXH6fQ2M

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRJbg2fXXjU
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Violence is their doing not ours and we will win like Ghandi.

John A MITCHELL
Herblay FRANCE

bonsoir ,

thanks very much for what you filmed. Yes we now have to prepare serveral cameras so that there is footage of people being stopped in asking their questions. We must continue to be in the law, without violence. Violence is their doing not ours and we will win like Ghandi.

You are giving us ideas and methods for here in France. Justly only one hour ago, I posted a WeAreChangeParis on 911blogger.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/20323

Thanks to 911blogger we can post WeAreChangeXXXXX world wide.

Please 911bloggers make copies of the articles you find useful because tomorrow there is no guarantee that you will refind the information on the internet, on YouTube.

Yours

John

Myers certainly warrants suspicion

He was the commander of NORAD when the JFK, Jr. "search" cover-up went down.

And he was the commander of NORAD when the plane-into-WTC exercise was "never thought of":

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2009/03/17/lies-on-the-horizon/

“On the altar of God, I swear eternal hostility against all forms of tyranny over the mind of man."--Thomas Jefferson

Was The Reverse Choke-Hold Battery?

The only person who might lawfully apply force is a duly appointed representative of that property, once a trespass advisory has been administered and defied. And such force might only be tolerated for making a citizens arrest.

The reverse choke-hold may qualify as battery if not in self-defense.

Myers Reference To Violent Extremism

The only violence on display was the alleged Marine shoving of the first questioner from behind and applying a choke-hold to the second.

As for extermism, the audience applause and chanting in response to the violence might qualify.

There Seems To Be Liabilty Issues For The Property

The "security" failed to protect the questioners from the physical battery administered by the alleged Marine, especially in light of the first battery followed shortly by a second by the same subject.

Given that there may be no expectation of privacy in the area recorded, the video may qualify as valid evidence.

The captured disregard for public safety expressed by the "security" officer at the entrance is likely not protected by privacy given the vicinity of the sidewalk.

The man is as dirty as they get.

Nice work getting in his comfort zone......that's why he brings his wife, like he's some sort of hero. A complete pos.

You're at the Nixon Library in Yorba Linda!

The heart of old-school Republican True Believers!

(I know all about this area as I used to live in Fullerton).

I love you dudes, but I think your approach was unwise and counter-productive.

This crowd was guaranteed to be 100% against you from the start, so by interrupting Gen. Myers all you did was reinforce the image of 9/11 truthers (or dissenters in general) as angry rude people with no legitimacy.

I think a far better approach would've been to wait until the Q&A and ambush him with several very hard questions about his activities and NORAD's complete failure on 9/11. Put him on the defensive.

If there was no Q&A, then set up on the public sidewalk near the entrances with signs pointing out his and NORAD's failure and have literature to pass out.

If you know that there will be no Q&A and make the conscious choice to be disruptive, then bring whistles and be whistleblowers. You should also decide beforehand what to do if you are assaulted, which you clearly were. I'm curious as to why you didn't press assault charges. Were you not aware of your right to do this or did you want to avoid the legal entanglement?

I appreciate the fact that you screwed up your courage enough to take him on in this venue, but I think our cause would be better served with more tactical and strategic thinking.

(More cameras would be good, too, getting a close up of the assault is very important)

I hope that we can all reflect on this incident and realize how to better approach these kinds of situations to optimize the chance for success and frame our message and our movement in the most positive way possible.

Cheers!

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

Good...

Job.


Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?