Open Letter to Rachel Maddow on Obama, Brzezinski and 9/11 Conspiracy

Hyperlinks here:

Ms. Maddow,

I saw the bit on MSNBC with your guest Brzezinski:

Hypocrite Brzezinski Slams "Conspiratorial View" Of History While Highlighting 50's Iran Overthrow

Perhaps you haven't examined the official myth about 9/11, i.e. that it was accomplished solely by Al Qaeda and Bin Laden. Given that Obama made a claim and didn't back it up with any facts- while admitting that elements in the US and Britain conspired to overthrow Mossadegh a half century ago- it's kind of a misnomer to say he "debunked" "9/11 conspiracists". And given the many lies told by Bush Administration principals about 9/11, and given the 9/11 Commission's failure to conduct a full and honest investigation- who's to say what really happened on 9/11?

The 9/11 Commission ignored 70% of the 9/11 families' questions

And your employer, MSNBC, published a report that says 25% of the 9/11 Commission Report, including the sections most relevant to linking 9/11 to al Qaeda and Bin Laden, was based on testimony obtained by torture:

9/11 Commission controversy – MSNBC

"Specifically, the NBC News analysis shows 441 of the more than 1,700 footnotes in the Commission’s Final Report refer to the CIA interrogations. Moreover, most of the information in Chapters 5, 6 and 7 of the Report came from the interrogations. Those chapters cover the initial planning for the attack, the assembling of terrorist cells, and the arrival of the hijackers in the U.S. In total, the Commission relied on more than 100 interrogation reports produced by the CIA. The second round of interrogations sought by the Commission involved more than 30 separate interrogation sessions."

The 9/11 Commission is also based in part on the testimony of interested parties who made false statements and whose testimony is contradicted by facts, the testimony of more credible witnesses, and even by their own statements; Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Gen. Richard Myers, etc. You should search the profiles of these people in this timeline, which is based entirely on mainstream sources: Complete 9/11 Timeline

Also search the profiles of whistleblowers the 9/11 Commission ignored- like Sibel Edmonds, Behrooz Sarshar, Robert Wright and Coleen Rowley (Time Magazine 2002 Person of the Year)

You had Brzezinksi on your show- why don't you interview Sibel Edmonds? The ACLU has dubbed her "the most gagged person in US history"; Ashcroft even classified her date of birth- he claimed "state secrets" and the need to protect "certain foreign business relations":

Public Letter to 9/11 Commission Chairman from FBI Whistleblower by Sibel Edmonds –

On 60 Minutes in 2002 Sen. Charles Grassley called her "very credible" and said the FBI "needs to be turned upside down":

Lost in Translation – CBS News

In October 2007 Ms. Edmonds made this offer:

EXCLUSIVE: FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds Will Now Tell All - and Face Charges if Necessary - to Any Major Television Network That Will Let Her –

And the London Times published this 3-part series, based on interviews with Sibel Edmonds and their own investigation:

For sale: West’s deadly nuclear secrets

FBI denies file exposing nuclear secrets theft

Tip-off thwarted nuclear spy ring probe

Why don't you interview Ms. Edmonds? You would probably learn a lot about how little credibility the Official Conspiracy Theory has. Plus, doing so would boost your ratings- and your credibility- far more than softball interviews with war criminals like Brzezinski:

Zbigniew Brzezinski: How Jimmy Carter and I Started the Mujahideen -

Interview of Zbigniew Brzezinski Le Nouvel Observateur (France), Jan 15-21, 1998, p. 76* - reprinted in


Erik Larson

PS- This peer-reviewed paper published April 2009 in a refereed journal has been attacked, but has yet to be "debunked"- or even "rebutted"- in a referred journal:

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe – Open Chemical Physics Journal

Don't you think Americans should be told the truth about how nanothermite got in the World Trade Center dust?

PPS- A NY Times-CBS poll in 2006 found that only 16% of Americans think the Bush Administration is telling the truth about "what they knew prior to September 11th, 2001, about possible terrorist attacks against the United States"

Are you one of the 16%, Ms. Maddow? And even if you are, don't you agree Americans deserve a REAL 9/11 investigation- one that examines ALL the relevant evidence- so we can put an end to the "conspiracy theories"?


Well said....LN

Maddow.....WE"VE HEARD THIS B/S BEFORE, are you with us or are you with the terrorists?

Be certain all you 9/11 Truth Advocates the MSM is dead...get out on the 11th! Get active for truth and justice every month!

In solidarity John

9/11 24/7 UNTIL JUSTICE!!

Letter to Maddow

Here's my letter to Maddow:

Dear Rachel,
The proof that the government "theory" of 9/11 is false is simply stated by two facts. The April 2009 peer reviewed article by Dr. Steven Jones. and others shows conclusively that nano-thermite was used to bring the WTC buildings down, and the need of the 9/11 Commission to cover up evidence of explosives being used by making eye-witness/hero William Rodriquez testify behind closed doors. Rodriquez has a movie of his experiences telling the truth about finding evidence and rescuing people with burnt skin from explosives going off in the sub-basement before the planes hit........As to the patsy Al Queda connection, the BBC showed many of the Saudi "hijackers" are still alive, so what Brzezinski and Obama utter about the silencing the critics of their non-scientific theory of 9/11 is thesbian in nature and pure state sponsored propaganda.

Here is my email to

Hi Rachel,

Next time you have Mr. Brzezinski on your show, I would be interested if you could ask him if he still stands by his opinion, declared in an interview with Le Novel Observateur, that his idea for the US to fund and assist the Mujahedeen and to encourage the growth and development of radical, Islamic fundamentalism in order to draw the USSR into invading Afghanistan was was well worth the creation of a few "stirred up Muslims."

Could you also ask him if he thinks the high tech, military explosive, nano-thermite, found by scientists to be present in the the dust from the WTC disaster (and recently discussed in a peer reviewed scientific paper) can be attributed to Al-Quaida?


Perfect tact!

HELLO....any body home!

Regards John

9/11 24/7 UNTIL JUSTICE!!

Getting through

Applause to you for bringing this up, to Rachael Maddow. If there was a chance for network TV to speak of this in any way but derisively, Rachael Maddow is that avenue. However, you must know that her job would be jeapordized if she went this route. So, how about posting with the link to the Bentham journal over at her website. Your letter was well written, so considering her inability (in all probability) to respond positively, maybe just posting at her blog would be the route to take. Even if she does not (cannot if she wants to keep her job) the next best thing would be to drop the information into her site. What do you think?

This is her site:

The most severe form of learning disorders are owned by those that "already know everything."

in the family....

Daughter Mika works for MSNBC: obviously the old goat is going to throw the broadcaster a few crumbs.... but only ever on his own terms....

And we wouldn't want to hurt Mika's feelings, would we?

Nothing to see here - move on.

Chris Shaw
Feral Metallurgist

thx guys- great letters, everyone

when Tucker Carlson and Glenn Beck addressed 9/11 questions, they got their emails and voicemails overloaded, i imagine Maddow's finding the same thing. Half the country and growing supports a new investigation into 9/11- and torture, illegal spying, etc.

Blubonnet, that's a good idea, but maddowfans is an unofficial blog and they didn't post coverage of the brzezinski interview, or the Obama/Iran speech- so i posted a link on her airamerica blog (jeall496), which did post vid of Obama acknowledging US involvement in the Iranian overthrow- someone got a WTC 7 demolition comment on there, too!

As long as Maddow's been in the business, and to have gotten as far as she has, she knows where the lines are that she can't cross, if she wants to keep her career in the Establishment-Corporate media world. I don't care if Maddow gets a clue or a spine, but when attempts are made by corporate shills to equate 9/11 inquiry with Holocaust denial- which is illegal in some countries- I think the public needs to step up and make it clear that the Right to Free Speech in the US is a Human RIGHT and protected by the Constitution- and on top of it, to suggest that the official 9/11 myth is acceptable is unacceptable- as i say in my intro on her blog-

equating 9/11 questions with Holocaust denial is really, really lame, to say the least- 3000 people were mass murdered on 9/11 and the Bush Administration has never given an honest account of why and how 9/11 happened- and they exploited 9/11 to instill fear and patriotic fervor, to justify imperialist rampages and the implementation of domestic police state tactics- there needs to be a FULL investigation, for truth, justice, reality, history and the sake of our Republic and posterity.