AE911Truth Reaches 700

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth has officially reached over 700 members. Congratulations!

Please continue directing people to view and sign the petition in addition to introducing other architects, engineers, and scientists to read the Active Thermitic Materials and 14 Points papers.

While you're at it, give them FSC document highlighted by Jon Gold found here:

Let's do our best to stay united and make 2009 the biggest year yet for 9/11 truth breakthroughs! As LeftWright says, Love is a verb, so lets get busier.

And checkout the new article on the homepage

29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11

More than 700 architects and engineers have joined call for new investigation,faulting official collapse reports

Gregg Roberts and Staff

The facts are in. The evidence is conclusive. These experts lay it all out.

For Some, the Doubts Began Early

“Something is wrong with this picture,” thought Nathan Lomba, as he watched replays of the Twin Tower collapses on television on September 11, 2001 A licensed structural engineer trained in buildings’ responses to stress, Lomba saw more on the screen than you or I. He puzzled, “How did the structures collapse in near-symmetrical fashion when the damage was clearly not symmetrical?”

Lomba was hardly alone in his discomfort. Most structural engineers were surprised when the towers fell.1 They mainly kept their misgivings to themselves, though, as Scientific American and the Journal of Engineering Mechanics, BBC, the History Channel and government agencies such as FEMA and NIST offered varying and often imaginative theories to explain how fires brought the towers down.

Full article in PDF format at:

Very Impressive

Excellent work.

700 INDEPENDENT engineers & architects trumps 3 ...

Per Griffin, There are ONLY 3 engineers who (having studied the evidence) publicly support the official government story (and their pays depends upon the government), while 700 INDEPENDENT Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth say the government's story is a "crock".

Great headline!

Great headline TomT. "700 INDEPENDENT engineers and architects trumps 3..." This really forces the issue and shows our superiority "AE911Truth vs. NIST" Let's take them head on! {700 versus 3..... } while PM had zero structural engineers. (Jay Meigs was merely a science editor). Their 'perceived credibility' is a joke.

Richard Gage is the best!


Question for

How many Architects and Engineers who signed the petition BEFORE NIST's final report on building 7 have since withdrawn their names because they are NOW satisfied with NIST's final report? Please list the names of any of those people, and their statements explaining why they have withdrawn their support for the petition.

Reply to zmzmzm


"NONE!!!" should be screamed from the rooftops!

I cannot figure out why does not publicize this. This is a major point . Having signed the petition and appearing on the website is a big career risk for practicing architects and engineers. Therefore, if the NIST report on WTC 7 satisfied them, surely they would resign from and have their names removed from the petition and from the website.

Why isn't announcing in a loud and clear voice that no one has resigned in spite of the final report? Shouldn't the whole world know this?