The Conspiracy Files - 7/7

Well, the BBC's resident "Official Story Protection Team" was at it again last week with the broadcast of "7/7".

It seems that the only thing that these hit pieces seem to generate is more public interest in the topic, as evidenced by this piece in the British Daily Mail; Conspiracy fever: As rumours swell that the government staged 7/7, victims' relatives call for a proper inquiry.

So, go ahead, BBC, knock yourselves out.

7/7 & 9/11 Mutual Myths Unraveling in a Complementary Manner

Thanks to concerted effort of a growing multitude.

The same old recipe

Concentrate on the most speculative theories - in this case, on those put forward in one documentary. Mention the July 7th Truth Campaign only briefly.

Don't ask why the authorities claimed for over a year that a cancelled train had been used in the attacks: simply say that the error was then corrected. Don't look at the problems with the other trains' schedules.

Call mr Power by his first name "Peter" almost throughout.

Have a survivor emotionally underline how nasty it is to doubt the official explanations.

And do not mention the following:

16 May 2004 A BBC Panorama program, London Under Attack, depicted a fictional terrorist attack involving three bombs on London Underground trains, followed by a fourth bomb on overground transportation device in central London about an hour later. The programme featured 'mock broadcasts' put together by the BBC and featured BBC World relief presenter Kirsty Lang. In the mock broadcasts used in the show, Lang announced the conclusion of the Home Secretary that the fictional attack, ‘bears all the hallmarks of Al-Qaeda’. The programme featured the Managing Director of Visor Consultants, Peter Power, as an advisor and commentator throughout (2). You can read a transcript of this programme here . Peter Power just happened to be doing a very similar thing again, featuring more 'mock broadcasts' on 7th July 2005, the day of the incidents in London.

EDIT: the BBC effectively LIED when they showed the half-burned passport of Ziad Jarrah, giving the impression that it was from the Twin Towers' rubble. The passport allegedly found in the WTC rubble was in mint condition and belonged to Satam Al-Suqami:

Here's a Global Research compilation of 7/7 related articles

Check it out. Numerous links to different stories/articles on 7/7 related issues all conveniently assembled together and posted at the following URL

Global Research brings to the attention of its readers key articles on the London July 7, 2005 bombings

Thank you Professor Chossudovsky.

An overtly racist piece

designed to play upon the fears of the British people. They interviewed two people involved in the attack, and form a story around it. The main fear is that members of mosques are going to get the video about 7/7 and go on the rampage. Now how likely is that? Not likely at all. The article mentions Muslim interest in the film, but not the interest of Christians, Jews, atheists, Buddhists, etc. What's the deal here?


A complaint can be made on the BBC's website within two months of airing the program. I hope many of us complain.

The passport thing I mention above exemplifies the subtle deceptiveness of Rudin's programs.

The Daily Mail article

Another great article by Sue Reid

Sue Reid, the journalist who wrote this article, is a real gem. She wrote a major article for the Daily Mail (which is Britain's second biggest selling daily newspaper) back in 2004, based on David Ray Griffin's book The New Pearl Harbor. (Online here.) Thanks to that excellent article, Griffin's book soared up to #2 on the bestseller list.

Reid wrote another super article all about Loose Change (Online here) in 2007, which was another piece of very positive publicity for 9/11 truth, and which would also have reached millions of people.

We need more journalists to follow Reid's lead in courageously and responsibly asking the difficult questions about 9/11 and other terrorist attacks, like the 7/7 London bombings.


Subtle Sue

There's some management of reader concern here: referring to the Ripple Effect video, Sue says "Fact or fiction, it does not matter."

That's right Sue - tell me how I should (not) think.

That's taking it out of context a bit

She is actually saying it could be fact or it could be fiction.

Yes she is. But she also

Yes she is. But she also states it 'does not matter', and shifts attention onto reactions in the Muslim community. Focusing on the effect of the points raised, not the points themselves.

Last year's footage

I just watched the footage the BBC reports was released last year:

The parts where Hasheeb Hussein is shown (towards the end of the clip) are strange. He appears crystal clear among a completely blurry, unidentifiable mass of people. How did they do that?



I haven't researched 7/7 to the extent that I have researched 9/11, however, here's an old archive I made. I do know that the similarities regarding those in power NOT wanting an investigation for 7/7 or 9/11 are uncanny.


Don't know if this was posted.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

The words of Bruce Lait

"The policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb was'. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag,"

“On the altar of God, I swear eternal hostility against all forms of tyranny over the mind of man."--Thomas Jefferson

regarding Rachel North...

... whom they bring on as one of the main witnesses.

Rachel and I had this exchange recently:

I'd say her logic leaves some to be desired... but that notwithstanding note the lack of factual detail in all she is saying... "Everything went black" Sure, it is quite normal not to know what happened after an explosion leaves you concussed and disoriented. Yes, this is the best they seem to be able to present to back up the official story - no hard evidence, no well-described plot, just vague testimony of an eyewitness who actually was in no state to have a precise recollection of much of anything.

Boris Epstein

Vessa: Easily accomplished:

Vessa: Easily accomplished: The blurriness is applied to the entire scene and then redacted from their target person to make it easier for viewer to locate what they should be focusing on, as well as to protect identity of others caught on tape.

My question in watching these films is not that they were "caught" on tape (although undoubtedly more questions should be asked along those lines), but what they were best caught on tape DOING. Why fill up with gas in a short run to the train station, unless you intended to come back to it? (Fits in logically with these same men buying round-trip tube tickets, as well.) What suicide bomber, minutes from fulfilling his "jihad" and ultimate martyrdom, would purchase batteries? That is NOT the m.o. of someone ready to leave the world in a few minutes! Unless of course the Koran now promises i-pods in heaven, but reminds you to bring your own batteries. Also, that it is only good manners to leave gas in the car so that the authorities can safely drive it back to MI5 for investigation.

So they...

... filled their car's gas tank before driving to the train station (how short *was* the car journey?) and bought return tickets to London. One of them complained about the change at the ticket counter. Hashiib Hussein then bought batteries and went to eat a hamburger before blowing himself up.

And people, including journalists, have no problem believing this.

BBC is the law

So it was BBC that decided the film maker was a threat to the nation and also tracked him down. What resources!

It also managed to produce previously not shown damning evidence.

The police and ministry of justice didn't see the need to go after the guy or show the clear evidence of the terror attack, but the long arm of BBC did, and how!

All in their own 'objective' way of course.

I bet their next expose will be to debunk those crazy and damaging conspiracy theories that Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11 and was building a nuclear weapon.

The irony is that in the beginning of 'The Ripple Effect' film it is more than proven how BBC is used for outright propaganda purposes and how procedures are in place to do so at any time by the state.


July 7th Truth Campaign response to Muad'Dib's Ripple Effect

Everyone should read this:

This organisation is the most realistic in regard to investigating 7-7.

"Truth Does Not Fear Investigation No Matter Who It Offends"

hoping assassination of Jean Charles de Menezes will be investig

Herblay FRANCE

bonjour ,
thank you very much for this post and the link to the excellent article in the Daily Mail. My sister, a nurse has never just up to yesterday, been able to discuss the idea that perhaps we had been lied to about 911, with out getting extremely angry. I slipped her a printed copy of the "Conspiracy fever: As rumours swell that the government staged 7/7, victims' relatives call for a proper inquiry" and now she is having doubts. For the first time since 2002 she is able to listen to the questions being asked on 911 and 7/7. Gave her for the nth time a copie of the DVD's that I give out on my local market
Zero , 911 Mysteries , Loose , Confronting the evidence , 911 Press for truth , The great conspiracy , Liberty bound , "Guerre au terrorisme", Vérités et mensonges.avi ? Jean-Marie Bigard death menaces
and I think when she gets back to Edinburgh she will view them. Thanks to the Daily Mail.

The article in the Daily Mail by Sue Reid is very well written and for once there is no ad homian attacks on the 911 truthers. She joins the club of honest journalists like Jeff Cobb from "Main Line Life" who also did a very professional article "Searching for truth in Wayne 13/02/2008"
When is there going to be enough honest journalists to make their own group "Journalists for 911 truth" ?

I am hoping that the ignoble assassination of Jean Charles de Menezes by the British police following the 21 July 2005 London bombings will be included in the enquiry



From London 7/7 via Paris 1995/96 to the Algerian false flag war

Bonjour, France!
I guess you know about the Paris bombings back in 1995/96, but perhaps not everybody here does.
There have been surprisingly many false flag operations. London 7/7, Madrid 3/11, Bali 10/12 etc. make up a terrible pattern of falsehood, as the German writer Jürgen Elsässer observes in his excellent book Terrorziel Europa (2008).
In chapter 4 Elsässer turns to Paris, 1995/1996, which again brings us to the «islamic wave of terrorism» during the 90ties.This is very good covered by French and Algerian human rights activists and journalists:

Who really bombed Paris in 1995/96?
Post script: During the process of ”La Sale Guerre” in 2001, journalists Lounis Aggoun and Jean-Baptiste Rivoire had a short interview with General Khaled Nezzar about the role of Algerian secret services in the Paris bombings (my poor translation):
«But, to our great surprise, far from denying the bonds that could exist between the GIA [islamic terrorists] and the DRS [Algerian secret services], he turned the ball to the French authorities: − Go see your services, they know very well this problem, excuse me…
− You would say that the French secret services are informed?
− They have to be informed.» (Françalgerie, page 455)

About the dirty war, one of the most extensive false flag operations in history:
In his book, Souaidia wrote that he saw colleagues coming back from missions in villages where massacres by "Islamic rebels" were reported the following day.
Gradually, he himself was drawn into the "dirty war". In 1994, he joined an anti-terrorist unit disguised as bearded Islamist fighters. They abducted and killed half a dozen people suspected of Islamic sympathies, he wrote.
"We arrested people, tortured them, killed them and burnt their bodies," he writes, adding that he saw about 100 people die this way.

Le Sale Guerre:

Le Procès de "la sale guerre":

About the book, Françalgerie:

Pourquoi l’omerta sur la Françalgérie ?


Rachel North is participating in a blog at the BBC...

Rachel North is participating in a blog at the BBC...if you want to join in

So far she has had a few comments (including one of my own) censored (sorry I mean removed) due to defamation. So sorry telling the truth is considered defamation nowadays.

Anyway I'm sure some of you here would enjoy a little debate over there with her?

Nick Kollestrom

Are there any other persons or institutions (apart from the correction in the official reprot) that can confirm the delay of the train(s ?) on 7/7, other that this 'Nick Kollestrom'?. If there are no other to confirm the fact than him, I think it is a somewhat uncertain piece of evidence.

It is a fact that...

... the train that the alleged suicide bombers allegedly used had been cancelled, and the authorities had to acknowledge that - a year later.

The BBC documentary simply trusts the authorities that they used an earlier train, without going into any detail.

When will we see the group : Journalists for 911 truth ?

Herblay FRANCE

bonjour ,
to check facts costs money and the BBC does pay the journalists to do it. 911 truthers are donating hundred of thousands of hours investigating and collecting information on 911 and that is why they are miles ahead of the journalists. However journalists are trained to write up good articles which is not at all easy for the 911 truthers. When the journalists create "Journalists for 911 truth" then together we will be able to reach a larger puplic and get the truth out sooner.

Yours John

Yes, John...

... that organization is something that we direly need.