9/11 101 Make-Up Test
Anyone who has read my posting knows that I came into 911blogger fairly computer illiterate, and on a dinosaur dial-up connection. So for many years, I have not had access to the thousands of videos available on-line.
I have recently had access to up-to-date computers and have been able to renew my 9/11 studies. I do not have the hours it takes to locate certain information, so I ask in my blog for responses to a few questions.
Has anyone determined what the white, boxlike structure was on the roof of the WTC? Many overhead views from aircraft show reasonably clean roofs on both towers. On 9/11, the box structure is quite obvious.
Has anyone determined the speed of the aircraft in the Naudet film? David Chandler's pragmatic mathematics inspired this thought.
Has anyone produced a video simulation of what a gravity collapse of the towers SHOULD look like, using the data available?
I appreciate any help or dialogue on these topics.
I also wish to express profound thanks to David Chandler for his wonderful work and calm demeanor in his videos.
I have taken open-minded looks at all the "theories" i.e. "no planes" and such. I conclude that each has a pearl of truth...much like the various religions of earth, not one is 100% correct, but all have a valid truth. Some may wish to dispute my own observation of a missile heading toward the Pentagon, and I understand their discontent. However, it does not invalidate my EAR-witness report of three distinct concussions that morning. Again, at very least, a pearl of truth, however annoying.
And pearls are created from annoying grains of sand.
- royster's blog
- Login to post comments
I can't help with your questions but...
I do think your last paragraph and final line include wonderful analogies. Glad to have you in cyberspace in real time. It's really something to get away from that dial-up, eh?
You may want to check out WebFairy.org for some info. in re: the Naudet Brother's film, although I'm not certain she addresses your specific question.