"Conspiracy Hypothesis," cause really, that is what it is.

Sorry to say that but he has WAY too much baggage. I just saw an AlterNet story today, "Is Glenn Beck Finished?" It states that 36 advertisers have dropped Beck so far... then goes on to chide Beck for some of his flagrant comments and guests, including:

"He's hosted 9/11 truther Alex Jones on his show, and helped fan the bizarre conspiracy theory that FEMA plans to imprison dissidents in internment camps." (This was the second thing mentioned after stuff about calling the president a racist and wishing for another attack by Bin Laden "for the good of the country.)

with Jon and RL. Alex Jones might be correct on some issues, but in my humble opinion, his style will alienate the people we need to reach. I think Jesse should stick with ae911truth, the forensic evidence, and maybe follow the money. He should also give background on the NIST scientists and their connections to nano-thermite technology.
Does anyone know how to reach Jesse and get him in touch with Richard Gage and Prof Jones, and Kevin Ryan? He needs some educating...

Two perspectives on Alex Jones, speaking from someone who has logged too many hours,to months, and longer listening, and I wouldn't say as much of a supporter but observer. Speaking strictly on 9/11. Most people new to 9/11 material will either be swayed by questions posed by the victims families and the anomalies in the physics that further inquiry is needed or be reinforced by their blind trust, the government would never do that, and the counter narrative (propaganda) group think of conspiracy theory.

To this perspective, that government for the most part does things in the interest of the public, except when we know that government officials can and have been hypocrites at least and corrupt at times is the fact that the mainstream public accept, and most do little about to correct. Within this perspective, what Alex Jones says is detrimental to 9/11 truth because not only does he and his operation support the inside job fact, but also this concept of New World Order that seems to take blame away from the military planners of 9/11, but to a loose group that sometimes infights of offshore international extremely powerful that have puppets, e.g. the military was its puppet on 9/11 and did its bidding. Among other things AJ talks about to fill time, food issues, water issues, vaccine issues, weather/climate change issues, but also government organizational control, e.g. CPS, eminent domain/farm licensing issues, e.g. raw milk regulated. He constantly said Bush engineered 9/11. He was against the bailouts and always against the federal reserve. Lately the issues of health care have been that it is a government takeover, that reform is not needed, government should stay out of peoples lives with little dialog to reform that is needed. The list goes on and on. But you can probably make the argument that the main stream public can easily make a guilt by association argument, that although he has guests and views that oppose the official government theory, that the many other issues that make up the various topics from day to day would serve to discredit, i.e. Alex Jones like any alternative media source has a credibility issue, If he were just a mainstream talkshow host, but just questions 9/11, the public would still question his credibility, but all the other issues AJ brings up, the public has even more ammo to raise suspicions on his credibility.

Now before mentioning the other perspective that a segment of the population seem to adhere to, AJ seems to be playing a zero-sum game that leans GOP (pro-2nd amendment, therefore always a lean to GOP, but he'll say Constitution), as he goes after the Democrats just as he did when Bush was in office, but always from a perspective sometimes at a distant from current events mainstream media (and many times rightfully so as mainstream media has been a corporate complicit propaganda media especially on issues related to 9/11 and the drumbeat to the Iraq wars).

The second perspective is that Alex Jones may help indirectly to 9/11 truth in the following way. You may have noticed that many in the mainstream public are unaware of 9/11 truth, but others do know, but have made the individual decision that it is none of their concern. What AJ does is that if 9/11 is not what motivates you to take action, then the door to action may be one of the many other issues that I previously mentioned to 'creating a perspective' outside the box. There are also issues that are meant for different audiences, whether they be police and taser issues, military and engineered war issues (somewhat), and other times what can be considered positive messages of not using drugs (the governments substance), being non-violent and bringing about change in a peaceful (but very vocal) manner. From this perspective, people may be brought into 9/11 truth from a different issue that they had a primary interest in that AJ covers in a breadth manner (not necessarily depth on issues). That shallowness on a single issue and instead what seems to be a seemingly wide thrown net for the largest appeal to various audiences is what individuals point to skeptically.

There's question is what is AJ's true intent, purpose, and beginnings? He has been publicly broadcasting in some way, shape, or form since the early 90's around the Waco Siege incident. Whether his purpose is to fill time and sway individuals (that may even join militias) that a violent solution against the government is not the answer, but peacefully against the almost abstract concept of the NWO could be one answer. Another could be to be skeptical of the government in everything it does, though this also has implications as well. Whether there's a profit component is another question, but given the amount of bandwidth, employees (does his employees have health care?), and other operational cost it would remain to be seen this contributing factor, given the amount of time he puts into his effort.

To the question of influence of the public there are also aspects of his operations that seem to have been innovative, like gonzo marketing, citizen private camera journalism. There is also little doubt that there is a segment of the population that follows (believes) what he says, perhaps with a grain of salt, but makes AJ as an influential figure, how much so is debatable, to what extent do more 9/11 truth supporters help that may not have 100% a single focus on 9/11 and to what extent does it or can be disinfo/misinfo or as some would say, make us look crazy to the general public. Though is there a line of just questioning 9/11 a better appearance (not looking as crazy) than supporting more AJ issues? And at what point can you call it a divide and conqueror to divide the 9/11 movement to those who focus soley on 9/11 and those in AJ camp or big tent theory ?

Lastly, AJ seems to be behind in one way or another behind the Loose Change movie series, and how many individuals first became aware of 9/11 that way and informed others through that movie before Press for Truth, many.

And Jesse should have on Gore Vidal, a person one no longer sees on television much because his father wrote the protocols for America's air defense, so Vidal knew from the get go that NORAD stood down on 9/11.

Jesse should have other personalities on that are now persona non grata because they speak their minds.

Dean Jackson/Editor-in-Chief DNotice.org
Washington, DC

I do know that Alex Jones refuses to cover the articles on NORAD at www.DNotice.org? I've gone into the comment sections at his website and advertised those articles. When I do, my website is inundated with hits, so his audience is interested, but Alex isn't?

Dean Jackson/Editor-in-Chief DNotice.org
Washington, DC

& be in sync.

Please keep this blog informed on how the outreach goes w/ Jessie.

That's the biggest stinking pile of garbage ever typed on this site, he criticises the criminal state of Israel constantly, he just doesn’t use the word "Jewish" enough I suppose for the disinfo operatives, who are probably working out of Tel Aviv ironically. Anyone want to ban this shill yet? Rep, hello?

make it sound like having a dual-citizenship is a bad thing.

________________________
“The greatest purveyor of violence in the world today -- my own government.” -Martin Luther King, Jr.
http://www.ubuntu.com