We Are Change Boston Questions Paul Volcker About The Bilderberg Group

10/15/09 A public address by Paul Volcker the current Chairman of the Obama administrations Economic Recovery Advisory Board. Paul Volcker was Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board from 1979-1987. To view the entire forum video feed go here:


Thank you for this interview. It is very correct and very polite

Herblay France

bonsoir ,
thank you for this interview. It is very correct and very polite. Okay Paul Volcker did not say what we expected but it is a beginning.
If people like you were not doing like you are doing the Bilderberg Group would still be secret and unkown. Paul Volcker is not doing his job as it should be him who should be informing the public by himself the existence of the Bilderberg Group and the implications of it's decisions.

Good work which needs to be regrouped with others in a video on the internet.

Yours John

Good work.

You may want to educate the audience as to what the Logan Act is. By bringing in the concept of treason in front of the audience, you put more pressure on Volcker (and you snap the audience out of the possible trance they are in).

With you in the struggle,
WeAreChangeLA - http://www.wacla.org

I think the question was

I think the question was perfect. When you talk about treason it makes members of the audiance uncomfortable and they may become hostile to the questioner. Volcker didn't really answer the question. Not much you can do about that.

Logan Act

§ 953. Private correspondence with foreign governments.

Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.


Volcker did not address the Logan Act, and I imagine 95% of the audience had no idea what the Logan Act is, so they didn't even comprehend that he was avoiding the meat of the question. By defining the Logan Act you are talking about treason without saying the word 'treason', and if nothing else, you are educating the audience of a concept they otherwise would not be aware of.

As far as the word 'treason' making an audience uncomfortable, how is that a bad thing? Any talk about 9-11 can make an audience uncomfortable, so does that mean we should not bring it up?

With you in the struggle,
WeAreChangeLA - http://www.wacla.org

Solve the Crime

I think the questioner did well.
But as far as the 9/11 Truth movement goes- just solve the crime.
There's evidence that any hack journalist or two bit lawyer could solve.
People such as Colin Gubbins, former head of SOE, a founding member of Bilderberg - were running freedom fighters in Occupied Europe during WW2.
Not all of these people necessarily are 'bad guys' - just because they have money or influence.
9/11 was a crime. There's plenty of evidence it was/is a solvable crime and who should be brought to testify and sent for justice.
Bilderberg is a red herring right now - As of now, other than the Logan Act in the US, there is no proof of their criminality.
Just shouting 'Bilderberg' is deflecting from the mass murder crime.
A Bilderberg gone astray could be the next problem - but not right now. Solve the crime.


Well put Binkster. Huge diversion from the ISSUE AT HAND !!

I would like to know

Just how much influence the Bilderberg group, which was named after a hotel in my country, has on world affairs. I do not appreciate secret fascist (= state + corporate power) debating clubs. That does not mean I think Bilderberg is a "secret cabal that rules the world". It means I think it is an insidious influence. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands (now dead), a born German, one of the true founding members of Bilderberg is well known in my country for his extramarital affairs (And children), his corruption involving Lockheed and Northrop, and his dubious relationship with Germany, and possibly, Nazis, before the war. He is rumoured to have written a letter to Hitler trying to strike some sort of Faustian deal about the Netherlands. I'm saying rumours to be careful. It's entirely likely such a letter was indeed written, given the investigative reporting in the matter.

Let's just say that secretive gatherings of such powerful people, especially mixed in with corporates, is undesirable. Such a club of CEO's, rich men, royal family and politicians who think they speak on behalf of the people when discussing world affairs was not elected by me. Therefore, I want it to stop.

I'll have you know I went to a 9/11 truth conference in Utrecht a few years ago, where I saw Edwin de Roy van Zuidewijn speak. He was married into the Royal Family, but the relationship went sour and his life was subsequently destroyed by Queen Beatrix. She used all of her influence to demolish his career opportunities. He's now a broken man forced into poverty. At the conference, I saw with my own eyes a photo he showed of Bernhard posing with a Nazi in uniform.

De Roy Van Zuidewijn has also said on Dutch public television that multiple covert agencies besides the AIVD (The Dutch CIA) exist that nobody even knows the name of. I believe this to be true. There is supporting evidence for this and precedent (Gladio). Members of such groups have been interviewed on public television. Their job was to set up the resistance in case of a Russian invasion. There is no oversight of such groups and normally only the Prime Minister and the Minister of Defence know of their existence. If they're lucky. In Italy, these groups committed false flag attacks, framing the communists. Gladio was directed and overseen from the United States and NATO.

I once might have talked to somebody like that when I was invited to do a self defense seminar. The man was watching his son participate. When I asked him what he did for a living, he reluctantly replied: "I've worked for Her Majesty". He said nothing more. I asked nothing more about it. One of my friends at school was once asked to work for the AIVD at a job market. They gave him a business card and asked him to visit a website. They need IT guys who can do data mining of surveillance data. They're understaffed. My friend did not follow up, I believe. Of course, if he did, he probably wouldn't say ;-)

For years, I have said the covert elite in this country is comprised of right wing protestant loyalists to the Royal Family. (If you want a comparison, compare to the "Orange Men" in Northern Ireland). Just ten minutes ago, I saw a clip on Youtube were former AIVD/BVD employees are interviewed and one explicitly confirms my suspicions. I was right all along. I do get a sense of satisfaction out of this, I must say.

For Dutch visitors of 911blogger, see below. ("Frits Hoekstra", aan het eind)

"Leader follows leader from bad to worse, as though by a malign law of nature. One ruler, evil or stupid or violent, breeds another more evil or stupid or violent."Liz McAlister