CIT - flyover theory - RIP
From the OpEd article:
Independent Investigation into Pentagon Attack Yields Alarming Information, Garners Wide-Ranging Endorsements
"The eyewitnesses in all of the most critical vantage points, on the other hand, independently, unanimously, and unequivocally report a drastically different flight path, proving that the plane absolutely could not have hit the light poles or the building."
The underlined part of this statement is not true.
At 14:37 in this video, P4T establishes the north flight path into the Pentagon is aerodynamically possible.
The witnesses prove the light poles were staged but they do not prove the plane did not hit the Pentagon.
In fact, they prove just the opposite. The witnesses at the Citgo station: Sgt. Brooks and Sgt. Lagasse saw the plane hit the Pentagon. Robert Turcios had an unobstructed view of all but the bottom floor. He said the plane was on "a direct line to go into the Pentagon" and it "collided". When Craig asked him if the plane flew over the Pentagon he said "no". Sean Boger was in the Pentagon heliport control tower. He saw the plane hit the Pentagon. The other CIT witnesses could not see the Pentagon.
There are NO witnesses who said they saw the plane fly over the Pentagon.
Roosevelt Roberts saw a plane flying away to the south-west.
As the P4T video shows, the "hijacked" plane approaching from the west could only turn to the south-east.
CIT's investigation proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the plane did not fly where the government said it did, but they went a bridge too far.
CIT selectively chose what they wanted to believe and not believe.