Richard Gage, AIA, on Truth News Radio Australia

Visit our podcast page:

Download the mp3 audio » click here  | Subscribe a Friend to TNRA!

Richard Gage, AIA Tonight it is my great pleasure to welcome Richard Gage to TNRA.

Richard Gage, AIA, is a San Francisco Bay Area architect and a member of the American Institute of Architects. He is the founding member of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth ( He has been a practicing architect for over 20 years and has worked on most types of building construction, including numerous fire-proofed steel-framed buildings.
Most recently he worked on the construction documents for a $400M mixed-use urban project with 1.2 million square feet of retail, parking structure, and 320,000 square feet of mid-rise office space - altogether about with 1,200 tons of steel framing. provides an extensive resource of expert opinion on the structural failure of three WTC buildings on 11 September 2001.

During the interview we engage with all the key questions surrounding the collapse of WTC buildings 1, 2 & 7 - including a critique of the flawed reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) .

We also get into the subject of connections between NIST and nano-thermite which Gage and an international group of scientists believe were used in the demolition of these buildings.

This is an extremely important interview - I encourage our listeners to forward this to as many people as possible, particularly those who are new to the subject or adhere to the official theory, which maintains that the WTC towers were destroyed solely as a result of plane impacts and fires.

Hereward Fenton

Names of Engineers who publicly support NIST...

If know of any engineers or architects who publicly support the official NIST Building 7 rendition, please log them on this link...

Try contacting Rube Goldberg

He might endorse the NIST version.

Honk if you agree with NIST!!!

Zdenek Bazant, Frank Greening et al write in their paper, What Did and Did Not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York,

"Universally though has the foregoing explanation[the explanation by NIST] of collapse been accepted by the communities of structural engineers and structural mechanics researchers,"

What is the source for such a statement? I've challenged debunkers to provide me with the name of just one architect or engineer who has gone on record stating that the specifically endorse Bazant's crush-down/crush-up hypothesis. So far I haven't been able to get any names. Of course, I could provide some names, such as Bazant's co-authors(Jia-Liang Le, Frank R. Greening, David B. Benson) and Ryan Mackey. But this hardly compares to the numbers of petition signers at Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

p.s. It looks like Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth is closing in on their 1,000th petition signer. I remember right before the National Geographic documentary, 9/11: Science and Conspiracy, aired they had 799 signatories. Then they gained over 100 or so within the month of September. I was hoping they could reach 1,000 by the end of October. But Alas!. Maybe we need another hit piece to put us over the top.


I too would be very interested in seeing a list of experts who publicly endorse the NIST report. How many we talking about here? A dozen?

More Speakers to Come........

Looks like our calls for more architects and engineers to go out and give the 'Blueprint for Truth' presentation has been heard. Here's 5 more speakers who have been officially tapped by Gage:

1) Dwain Deets, AIAA
2) Dan Noel, mechanical engineer
3) Derek Johnson, mechanical engineer
4) Kathy McGrade, engineer
5) Adrien Beaulieu, engineer