9/11 Controlled Demolition Movement cutting edge: Announcing the truth to the officialdom. The politicians.

9/11 Controlled Demolition Truth, Peace and Justice Movement high delegation met, for a second time, with California Senator Dianne Feinstein Office Director Jim Molinari. San Francisco, Nov 4, 2009.

Attending for the movement were Richard Gage, founder and leader of a AE911Truth.org architects organisation, Janette MacKinlay, artist, 9/11 survivor, Mark Graham, co-founder of Davis 9/11 Truth, Gregg Roberts and Jim Hoffman, scientists researching the 9/11 issues.



The delegation met with a complete denial on the part of the Office, practically preventing the facts introduction and a fair debate.

No wonder.
The issue is of such huge, historic proportions and grave significance, that nobody in any official function can accept, state, side or support the obvious facts and the truth, or at least not at this time.

I think even there might have been a time not so long ago when a white powder was being sent around to the big media outlets, maybe with the message "do not break this", "do not talk about this".

What was it that Nuremberg trials had that is missing today? Victorious Allies. Nazi leaders did not put themselves on trials on their own volition.
But then again, this is America, where many things are possible, if you really want them and work for them to happen. And the situation might be somewhat different.

How different? That is why we need new independent investigation, to find out.

http://AE911Truth.org , http://www.theNeedToRemember.com , http://www.JanetteMacKinlay.com , http://911Primer.com

I will send news of this meeting to DrudgeReport.com and HuffingtonPost.com tip lines, but I think the result will be predictable. - Nyet. Or, not yet?

Engineers & architects supporting NIST's Building 7 Report.

Logic follows that Feinstein's office stands behind the architects and engineers who publicly support the offical NIST Building 7 rendition.

"Architects & Engineers who publicly support NIST". This is a line in the sand. This should be an embarrassment to Feinstein's office, because there are very, very few who publicly support NIST's Building 7 Report. (Griffin's audio--> http://community2.myfoxdfw.com/_911-Truth-The-evidence-is-clear/audio/46... )

If you know of any "Architects & Engineers who publicly support NIST's Building 7 Report", please log them at this link.--> http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5946

Context . . .

Hearing these interviews it's helpful to have to knowledge of who it was that was brought in to try to shut this group up about demolition:

Donald L. Hansen, of OKC notariety:


"Retired San Francisco bomb squad detective, Donald L. Hansen, was retained as an expert witness with respect to the government's evidence concerning the bomb."

If anything, this shows the relevance of Richard's work.

And I agree with those who are responding to the "controlled demolition movement" aspect of the title on this post -- regardless of the reasoning initially, that kind of thing often ends of dividing people and distracting from the content of the post. Better to keep the focus.

What's relevant here is that an hour + of time was wasted arguing with a man who likely covered up for OKC as well, and now is called on to cover-up again. It may be psychological, but that would be quite a gamble on the part of those who likely planted the bombs at OKC in the first place, to assume his denial would never crack. All it takes is one person who knows what's really going on to influence everyone around them with psychology.

Has anyone looked for nano-thermite in the OKC remains ?

Herblay FRANCE

bonjour ,
the demolition of the towers was an expert job and it had to work with zero erreur. with military precision so where did these experts try out this nano-thermite on a massive scale. It could have been OKC and if that is the reply has anyone looked for nano-thermite in the remains ?

I profit from this occassion to ask also has anyone confirmed nano-thermite in the thousands of ton of debris on Staten Island ?

Also can anyone tell me if bomb smell dogs are trained to smell out nano-thermite ? What reaction would these dogs have with nano-thermite sprayed on the metalique supports ?


OK City inside

I think in case of OK, a special thermobaric air-fuel detonation device was used.

Surprisingly, google it, search for it. It should not take too long. Here a small pice of info - http://oklahomacitybombing.blogspot.com/

another video

Richard Gage is doing good things!

AE911 is doing great things. This is the Jim Garrison organization of the 21st century. History will look kindly back to AE911 100 years from now. and there will be a true investigation.

I applaud your patience-

And your mission was accomplished in the exposure of the bankruptcy of the 9-11 defenders. We are all thrilled to hear that you will persevere !!!

"9/11 Controlled Demolition Movement"?

What's with the phrase "9/11 Controlled Demolition Movement"? Is that a term Richard Gage is using?

The petition at AE911Truth.org is calling for a "full inquiry" into the "possible use of explosives that might have been the actual cause of destruction"

It doesn't proclaim the WTC towers were destroyed by CD. And, it calls for the investigation to "uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01"; it implies the issue is larger than simply the WTC destructions. Given that Gage is an architect, i expect he would focus on the WTC destructions- but he's not calling for a "movement" that limits itself to that.

"On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that might have been the actual cause of the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7."


9/11 Controlled Demolition Movement

Well it was I who used this phrase. Let me elaborate a little bit.

9/11 Truth Movement is a group of people who either doubt the official version of 9/11 attacks or are convinced that it is a lie.

Now, the 2009 Nanothermite report of Dr. Jones and Prof. Harrit proves beyond any doubt that 9/11 is a controlled demolition, therefore an inside job.
The invaluable scientific research of Richard Gage and his foundation only confirms this. And this is also being presented in their public education campaigns and their attempts to initiate a new investigation.

Also, merely visual inspection of 9/11 attacks footage will have lead inescapably to the conclusion that it is indeed a controlled demolition.

Even though the research work of R. Gage and his AE911Truth.org clearly leads to a conclusion that 9/11 is a controlled demolition, as is obvious from their website and presentations, I think it is very wise that officially, they are demanding a NEW INVESTIGATION. Since only a new investigation can attest and certify definitively, officially, that 9/11 is a controlled demolition inside operation.

So, 9/11 Controlled Demolition Movement is a group of people who understand that 9/11 is a controlled demolition.
The intellectual potential required for making this deliberate conclusion, in my view, must be around IQ70 and higher.

9/11 was a crime...

That resulted in the murder of 2,973 people. That resulted in our loss of civil liberties. That resulted in our Government launching illegal pre-emptive wars. That resulted in the expansion of Executive Power to the point of a near dictatorship. 9/11 was not a "Controlled Demolition."

I wonder how people would react if I labeled a thread "The 9/11 Pakistani ISI Movement" or "The 9/11 Insider Trading Movement" or "The 9/11 Ignored And Censored Whistleblowers Movement" or "The 9/11 Saudi Royals Movement" or "The 9/11 Ignored Warnings Movement" or "The 9/11 Able Danger Movement" or "The 9/11 CIA Tracked Two Of The Hijackers For 18 Months Before 9/11 Movement."

Incidentally, I don't think it's a good idea to say that you need a very low IQ to see a "Controlled Demolition" considering that a lot of people don't believe it. That's not exactly how you win friends.

And thank you to Janette for acknowledging that there is more to the story.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? The facts speak for themselves.

9/11 Truth Movement

personally, i feel an affinity with people that support transparency and accountability- whether or not they openly doubt the OCT or believe it was an inside job. 51% of Americans supported an investigation into the Exec branch's conduct before, during and after 9/11, in the 2007 Zogby poll. Only 16% believed the Bush Administration was "telling the truth" about what they knew prior to 9/11, in the 2006 NYTimes/CBS poll.

Petr - "I think it is very wise that officially, they are demanding a NEW INVESTIGATION. Since only a new investigation can attest and certify definitively, officially, that 9/11 is a controlled demolition inside operation."

Petr, as you yourself stated the above, do you think it would be wise to continue using the term "9/11 Truth Movement"? Personally, I see the term as advocating for truth and justice, not proclaiming "the truth". There's an enormous body of evidence in the public record which proves the OCT is false; but what's the truth? A full investigation is required to determine all the facts and responsible parties. By publicizing the evidence we are raising awareness and creating public pressure for a real investigation- that there hasn't been one, and disingenuous efforts are being waged to discredit the case for one, is also damning for the OCT.



"I feel an affinity with people that support transparency and accountability," and get along with A LOT of people who don't agree with everything I say. It's those people that have attemped to, and in some cases succeeded in hijacking the movement that bother me.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? The facts speak for themselves.


It's obvious that the "9/11 Controlled Demolition Movement" has rules about certain things. 1) You are not allowed to think for yourself. If you do, then you are labeled COINTELPRO. 2) You are not allowed to think about alternative strategies to bring justice and accountability for the 9/11 attacks even if the media and debunkers constantly use controlled demolition against you. The main focus must be controlled demolition. If you deviate from that, then you are labeled COINTELPRO. 3) You must denounce all other forms of research into the 9/11 attacks that do not include controlled demolition. If you look at any other facet of the attacks, you are labeled COINTELPRO.

No thanks. Enjoy your club.

Edit: This comment was in response to AtomicBomb who accused me of being COINTELPRO.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? The facts speak for themselves.


"Jon's position on CD has no merit whatsoever"

Sure it does. I take it you haven't seen every hit piece over the years attacking the movement by using the Controlled Demolition hypothesis? I take it you haven't seen every anti-9/11 Truth documentary over the years that has focused specifically on the Controlled Demolition hypothesis? I take it you haven't seen the majority of debunker sites out there focusing primarily on the Controlled Demolition hypothesis? I take it you haven't seen the "media pundits" over the years make people look like fools on television with the Controlled Demolition hypothesis? I take it you've never experienced something like this? My problem is not the Controlled Demolition hypothesis. That's not what my "argument" is about. You are trying to make it about whether or not it happened, and that isn't the argument. The argument is that since 9/11 Truth has been made synonymous with Controlled Demolition, something that is completely unbelievable to a lot of people, maybe we should try promoting other information that hasn't been used against us too many times to count. Again, according to people like you, we are not allowed to have a mind of our own. We are not allowed to have an opinion. We must do as you say, and that is more "disinformation" than anything I have ever done. Incidentally, saying that I put down DRG at every opportunity is a misrepresentation. Again, we are entitled to have our own opinions, and we are allowed to voice them.

Edit: This was in response to another Atomic Bomb accusation.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? The facts speak for themselves.

9/11 Controlled Demolition inside job attacks

Well, you are right there is more strategies, and everybody can employ according one to their will and free selection.
But to select a path of saying that "9/11 is not a controlled demolition", that is an interesting one. Where would you go with that?

Yes you can think what you want, but, privately, Jon, will you give it to us - WITHOUT strategizing - that 9/11 WTC attacks are a controlled demolition ??
Thanks :]

And YES, it is VERY WISE to make controlled demolition a MAIN FOCUS. It is one of few, or the only one HARD IRREFUTABLE SCIENTIFIC fact andevidence. This is exactly what is missing with JFK, Pearl Harbor, etc ... we should stick with the clearest arguments.

In fact a lot of varied

In fact a lot of varied research is welcome by everyone I know, and I dont know what was wrong with letting the quality research here speak for itself. Instead of that, without canvassing opinion or asking for collaboration Jon has decided he knows best and the movement has to change, and to promote
dubious weaker arguments whilst at the same time undermining CD evidence without discussing what is wrong with it.

It was Jon who decided to force his minority views on this site, it was he who decided we had to change. In doing so he has caused offense to a lot of people who do think CD is the strongest evidence.

I would be interested to hear...

One of my "dubious weaker arguments."

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? The facts speak for themselves.

Pointing out...

How the 9/11 attacks made the Bush Administration popular enough to launch pre-emptive wars with no opposition doesn't help us? Like the PNAC said, a "catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor" would enable them to do what they wanted, so I don't see how pointing to evidence of this hurts us. Fact #46 makes sure to mention "no one wants to say no to Bush now" so again, I don't understand how this hurts us.

I can tell you that the "9/11 Controlled Demolition Movement" with the obvious rules I mentioned will hurt this cause more than anything I've ever done. Thanks for nothing.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? The facts speak for themselves.

You may have noticed that my

You may have noticed that my answer to this alluding to point#46 has been deleted.
Seems like Jon is more important to the moderators of this site than anyone else who disagrees with him

9/11 Controlled Demolition inside job attacks

9/11 is a controlled demolition. Per irrefutable scientific evidence. You can have your opinion and your mind and your views, but there is one truth, and that is that 9/11 attacks, a central issue of 9/11 Truth, were done by a controlled demolition of 3 towers.
True, then there is ramming an aerial vehicle into Pentagon, and shooting down an airplane in Pennsylvania.

All else "9/11.." as you mention are secondary preceding or following events. But the MAIN 9/11 Truth issue is 9/11 attacks, and that was controlled demolition.

I could as well almost ask you,
1. Do you know, or believe, that nanothermite was found on the site? That steel melted?
2. If so, what do you think that means?

And we should EXACTLY concentrate on the strongest scientific point, and that is CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

The issues is very hard, serious and overwhelming. It almost includes psychotherapy, of each citizen, of the whole nation.
WHO ELSE but US should be speaking the truth?
And, I am not here to make friends, Im here to seek, to speak, to respect and to serve the truth.
About that last my IQ remark, i meant, that by now, it should be, and it is, technically very easy to see that 9/11 WTC is a controlled demolition.

But many people in denial will fall into several categories :
1. Disbelieve. Cannot be inside government/secret services job. No way.
2. Probably was inside, but if it was done by our government, it must be good.
3. Probably was inside, bad, but it is not wise to admit it or talk about it, since it will damage the country.

So we all might end up being partners in CRIME. That is quite a stable situation -- unless we speak the TRUTH.

Jon, it is a controlled demolition inside job.



This claim that controlled demolition is "irrefutable" is starting to get on my nerves. I understand why people would want to focus on it. It is a very strongly-supported issue. Yes, there is even scientific evidence to back it up. But it has not yet been proved. I have little, if any, doubt that the towers were taken down via controlled demolition, but I also understand the scientific method and realize that we haven't reached a point where we can conclusively state that it was a controlled demolition.

Even if it was, we can't focus on it if activists won't handle the information responsibly. The main issue here isn't whether or not we think it was controlled demolition, its about whether or not it's helping the movement yet. We've been doing this for eight years, you guys! Where's our investigation? Where's the accountability? It's just waiting down there in the basement, and we have the key we can use to open the door and get down there to bring it back up, but all this poorly-handled focusing on controlled demolition has deadlocked the door. And the key will be useless if we don't find a way to fix the lock.


yes - getting on your nerves. I know. its hard. its the truth.

9/11 WTC controlled demolition is proven irrefutably, and beyond any doubt whatsoever. Just as, 1+1=2 ... correct?

We exactly need to focus on the clearest, hard evidence scientific fact of the whole 9/11 attacks.
Only the truth will help the movement. Activists need to focus on handling this, realize the reality.


Almost a year later but whatever

No, it has NOT been irrefutably proved. This is what gets on my nerves. I go and say "Look, CD is probably right, I endorse it completely, but on a scientific level it's not quite 'proof'" and everyone has to treat it like an insult. "Yes, the truth is hard." "It has been proven. Irrefutably!" "It's the best evidence." etc... Get over yourselves and realize that chanting that mantra over and over doesn't make it a fact. There are scientific standards we have to accept if we're to be taken seriously. It's things like this that allow the media to laugh at us.

Great work Richard...

...and everyone else involved. Keep getting in their faces and denying them the opportunity to ignore this issue and eventually the dam will crack.

"Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government." -The Declaration of Independence

Think "Economic Hitman" when

"Justice will only exist where those not affected by Injustice are filled with the same amount of Indignation as those offended"

listening to the PUSH BACK these traitors use when being presented with the facts surrounding 911, why is anybody amazed at this?

The demolitions expert brought in by this senators office is a perfect example of how this works.....he just needs to be added to the aiding and abetting traitors list when the truth starts to be mainstream!

You guys are GREAT!!

I love the way that everyone shares in the spotlight....or is it put in the hotseat? Just kidding.

It's exhausting and frustrating to deal with people like that. Y'all are saints.

It's very true that nothing may ever get through to people like that but not necessarily.

When I was a kid I did lots of bad, regular kid stuff that really upset my parents. My mother would sit me down and talk earnestly for a long time about what I did, how it effected others, how it effected me, etc. While she was talking, I would just be looking around the room, whistling tunes.

Think about that. Hey, if I had ever had a kid that did anything like that, trust me, they wouldn't last a minute!

I whistled away almost my entire childhood but, for whatever reason, my mother just calmly kept talking to me while I did it.

The truth is, that I heard EVERY SINGLE WORD that my mother ever spoke to me at those times, and I always thought very deeply about all of them.

What stopped her from slapping me silly, I don't know. But what stopped me from acting differently were shame, pride, immaturity, not wanting to be wrong, stubbornness, etc., among an entire constellation of factors. After I did it to my first boss and was fired for it, I stopped. ( Just kidding. Ha!)

No, I've turned out pretty good, I think. The point is, we never know what impact we're really having on people. Another term for "not knowing" is faith. It takes a great deal of faith to keep on keeping on in the Truth movement.

Yet, as my mom (aka Whistler's Mother) discovered good things can come from patience, persistence, and faith.

Next time you guys run into this kind of thing, just think of the person as a little kid looking all around the room and whistling tunes while you try to reason with him/her. It may make the time go faster and bring a little humor to mind. Because, after all, what that guy did is exactly the same thing I used to do, he's just bigger and louder.

What a TERRIFIC TEAM your have, both in front of the camera AND behind. Y'all are like the Duracell Bunny(s) of 9/11 Truth!!


"You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi