Truth Squad: 9-11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey finally confesses 9-11 Commission could not do it's job

WeAreChangeLA's Jeremy Rothe-Kushel, Katy Kurtzman, Bruno Bruhwiler, Dan Noel, and Paul Wittenberger confront 9-11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey about the 9-11 False Flag attack.

Part 1

In Part 1, Jeremy asks Kerrey about the fact that Al Qaeda couldn't have brought down the buildings on Ground Zero with high tech explosives. So who is the real threat? Kerrey's response? "I was there that morning, I saw two planes fly into them." Katy Kurtzman hands Bob Kerrey the peer-reviewed paper that proves high-tech explosives were used in the destruction of the three WTC towers on 9-11-01 in NYC.

What about building 7? "That building was full of fuel... that question has been examined by the 9-11 Commission."

"If in New York City, that thing had been blown up, believe me, the people of New York would know and would be angry about it."

Part 2

"We've been identified by these organizations as the number one enemy... as the 'head of the snake' as Bin Laden has described us... We've got to go to Afghanistan because that's where Bin Laden and Al Qaeda are... When it comes to National Security, public opinion can be dangerous." - Bob Kerrey

In Part 2, Bruno reminds Kerrey that all the current torture, loss of freedoms, and deaths around the world lead back to Ground Zero on 9-11. The pressure mounts, so Kerrey begins to back track and make excuses for the 9-11 Commission.

Part 3

In Part 3, Dan Noel who is also an engineer member of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth hands Bob Kerrey a card of information directing him to the proof of controlled demolition of the three WTC towers Paul Wittenberger asks Kerrey about Building 7. Jeremy confronts Kerrey about the aspects of treason involved with covering up the truth about 9-11, and Kerrey responds "It's a 30 year conspiracy".

I salute WACLA. Outstanding

I salute WACLA. Outstanding representation of what makes our nation so unique. Bless you.

Excellent work, again!

WACLA strikes again! You go, guys! :)

"That building was full of fuel"

"That building was full of fuel"

Yes indeed it was, Bob.

Hats off to WACLA Truth Squad, the discomfort in the room was palpable.


The fuel that did not contribute to the initiation of collapse, which was stored in tanks that were recovered mostly intact, if memory serves correctly?

Thanks for proving how little you guys have actually investigated 9/11, Bob.

That was dropped

Approach summary 12-18-07 Page 6
The working hypothesis is based on an initial local failure caused by normal building fires, not fires from leaking pressurized fuel lines or fuel from day tanks.

Tech Beat 11-20-08
Column 79—the structural component identified as the one whose failure on 9/11 started the progressive collapse—would still have led to a complete loss of the building if fire or damage from the falling debris of the nearby WTC 1 tower were not factors.

I think they did their job.

I think they did their job. Their job was to back up the official story. That is what they were told to do and most of your brain washed fellow citizens fell for it. Thanks to the controlled Media. As I keep saying most people still don't know about Building 7. How stupid can people be? Perhaps they don't give a damn. The official story isn't worthy of a comic book.


I think they did their job. Their job was to back up the official story.

Quoted for truth!

I make a point of reading all the down voted comments because I find many of them to be the best comments. - Atomicbomb

'Ground Zero for the War on Terror....

goes back to Ground Zero on 9/11." I like that phrase as a lead-in to bringing up crime scene evidence that explosives were used.
This is a NOT a theory. Molten Steel at Ground Zero proves explosives were used. And this proves molten steel:

NIST Admits Freefall for WTC 7 (pt. 3)

WTC7 + Freefall = Controlled Demolition = 9/11 was inside job.

(To use Chris Sarn's formula)

So we have many weapons at our disposal:
1) Peer-reviewed science of high explosives in the dust
2) Proof of molten steel
3) Melted molybdenum evidence via FOIA request of the US Geological Survey
4) NIST's own forced admission of freefall

That's four check=mates for inside job.

Disgusting dance:

Kerry reveals himself as the tap-dancing, shuck & jive apologist for the OTC he is. The sheeple in this audience leave me infuriated, then just sad.
Great job WACLA. You got guts.

Bob Kerrey has more explaining to do.

Look up John DeCamp..Ex Highly Decorated Vietnam vet, ex Senator for the State of Nebraska. Also atorney for some of the people who were children and teenagers when Senator Decamp wrote "The Franklin Coverup"
and "Conspiracy of Silence" both books and videos on Google and Youtube (look them up !!)Next time your asking Bob Kerrey questions about whether or not the 12 or so kids from a childrens home in Nebraska were lying when they say he raped them during pedophilic sex parties in Nebraska and in Washington DC. Ask Him if he is familiar with "The Finders" Make hard questions impossibly hard.

totally owned

Imagine the blackmail material they have on this poor excuse for a human being....a walking relic from the DeCamp revelations.
Another Barney Frank

"It's a 30 year-old conspiracy..."

That might be the golden moment from this exchange. Jeremy thinks Kerry is talking about some other event, yet Kerry CLARIFIES his statement, "confirming" that 9/11 was being planned *by somebody* for around thirty years. There are many valuable concessions and admissions from Kerry here, but that particular sentence speaks volumes. Admission of conspiracy - Check. Suggestion of long term planning / pre-meditation - Check.

Let me just rephrase my observation here...

We now have a member of the 9/11 Commission, ON VIDEO ADMITTING THAT 9/11 WAS A "CONSPIRACY". AND he suggests that is was VERY long in the planning. Was bin Laden planning to destroy those towers from the day they were built? Even BEFORE the U.S. trained the mujahideen to fight the soviets? Even BEFORE there was any significant and/or accumulated justification for so-called "blow-back"?


...Or did the globalist billionaire who was involved in building the towers have them designed and built SPECIFICALLY for that fateful day in September, nearly 30 years later? Did the towers, which looked like the number "11" (ELEVEN), fall on "9/11" (ELEVEN) / (EMERGENCY - 911) as part of a multifaceted, multilayered PSY-OP? ...Anyway... Probably better to ignore the speculation, of course. 9/11 COMMISSIONER BOB KERRY ADMITS 9/11 WAS A "30 YEAR-OLD CONSPIRACY"!!

"Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without." - Buddha
"What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." - Gandhi
"The Sun never shined on a cause of greater worth." - Thomas Paine

This is something I have wondered

I have thought a lot about this, especially when people get all caught up in the whole "When would they have had time to plant the explosives?" question;

What if they built WTC 7 to be destroyed? Only speculation, but interesting to ponder, especially in light of this. It could have been built only to eventually be destroyed in a sensational fashion. Not to discredit Richard gage or Steven Jones, because I certainly believe in the evidence they have presented, but if you had them ready to go, then added nanothermite, wouldn't that make for something really spectacular that the whole world would HAVE to stop and watch and think, "Terrorists suck"

Build up the boogeyman until he is so terrible, everyone is ready to pay for protection.


The love that you withhold is the pain that you carry

I don't think it is feasible...

for the buildings to have been "pre-rigged". Too many thousands of workers involved in building a structure like that. There would be too much exposure and publicity at that time. However, those elevator upgrades, the "power-downs"... Only several dozen people need be involved in that. Twenty men can move many tons of material in very little time.
"Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without." - Buddha
"What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." - Gandhi
"The Sun never shined on a cause of greater worth." - Thomas Paine


"I don't know if we'll ever get to the bottom of it-- It's a 30 year-old conspiracy," Kerry said. "No, I'm talking about 9/11," Jeremy interjected.

"THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT," Bob Kerry reaffirmed.

Damn, that IS the take away line from this whole affair. Obviously Kerry wasn't talking about al-Qaeda in this specific context of 'criminal treason.' I didn't see that last clip when I posted this morning. Just as well, Consciousness brought it home loud and clear. Good to see you back, C.

*Also the Commission might well have been set up to fail and lied to and all that, with limited time, but they did not even subpoena the Black Boxes. So they never examined the FDR for AA77, did they?
How can you have an investigation where you don't demand this evidence? And they did not subpoena the 80+ Pentagon surveillance videos. And they completely omitted Mineta's testimony and said that the matter of who financed all of this was of 'little significance.' That is not merely failing due to circumstances beyond your control--- that is DELIBERATE COVER-UP.

Who Remembers...

the story of someone in the military telling how he was enlisted to devise scenarios for the destruction of the WTC Towers back in the mid seventies?

I encountered his story on more than one occasion over the years but never saved anything.

I lurk...

Watching... Waiting... Silently stalking in the shadows...


I've been trying to focus on getting my life in order. I'll be slowly coming back into the fray from here on out. I've also had some additional mind blowing "awakenings" regarding the legal system. I was researching that angle for a while. Let me just tell you, EVERYTHING is a lie!
"Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without." - Buddha
"What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." - Gandhi
"The Sun never shined on a cause of greater worth." - Thomas Paine

Legal System Truth

I want to learn more about the legal system, and have made efforts to do so recently. Please contact me at your earliest convenience.

With you in the struggle,
WeAreChangeLA -

P.S. 9-11 Truth folks in Oklahoma could use some legal help right now.

I work for the 9-11 First Responders, the 9-11 victims, and all those who are being slaughtered and tortured because of 9-11.

30 years ago

Didn't the Soviet Union invade Afghanistan 30 years ago?

With you in the struggle,
WeAreChangeLA -
I work for the 9-11 First Responders, the 9-11 victims, and all those who are being slaughtered and tortured because of 9-11.


Yes--after, that is, the CIA (with the strong support of National Security Advisor Brzezinski) had started organizing the mujaheddin to foment unrest in the hopes of inducing a Soviet invasion to defend what at that time was a pro-Soviet government in Afghanistan. That goal was accomplished by the end of 1979. It was against the backdrop of such events (which included the revolution and hostage crisis in Iran) that, in early 1980, just a few weeks after the Soviets had invaded Afghanistan, Carter announced that the U.S. would consider the oil resources of the Persian Gulf to be a vital national interest, and would act militarily if need be to prevent these from falling into the hands of an outside force (as is customary, the deepening of U.S. interventionism overseas is couched in terms of 'defending' and 'protecting' against some other entity).

If I had to guess, I'd say that that's more likely the '30 year old conspiracy' Kerrey had in mind--that is 30 years prior to today, circa 1979, when the military and intelligence establishment were anxious to get the U.S. public to overcome its post-Vietnam aversion to an interventionist foreign policy; as opposed to 30 years prior to 9/11, circa 1971.

Hmmm. Thanks for the correction.

When did they break ground on the towers again? '72? '73?

You could be right, RM. This whole course of events surrounding U.S. interventionism in the Middle East could be what Kerry was talking about. But I think it is ambiguous at this point. Again, Jeremy DOES seek clarification; "I'm talking about 9/11." Kerry confirmed that he was also talking about 9/11. I think maybe both you and I are drawing a lot of assumptions from that statement.

At the very least, Kerry should be pressed to further explain what he meant if anyone has the chance to speak with him again.


You know though... when you put all this in context, it sure doesn't sound like he was talking about Middle East interventionism.

"Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without." - Buddha
"What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." - Gandhi
"The Sun never shined on a cause of greater worth." - Thomas Paine

Not sure

I'm not certain when ground was broken at WTC, though I believe construction would have been underway by '70, possibly earlier. I believe the towers were completed in '73.

Of course it's true that, while I do lean towards one possible interpretation of his comment, we don't have much to go on here and, sure, I'd be curious to hear him elaborate should anyone be able to put such questions to him again.

According to Wikipedia

"In March 1965, the Port Authority began acquiring property at the World Trade Center site.[37] Demolition work began on March 21, 1966 to clear thirteen square blocks of low rise buildings in Radio Row for construction of the World Trade Center.[38] Groundbreaking for the construction of the World Trade Center took place on August 5, 1966"

My 2 cents...

The love that you withhold is the pain that you carry

Bob Kerrey

His response to Bruno's question about how he sleeps at night fits hand in glove with Bush looking under the table for WMD.

It seemed like Kerrey,

after being broken down from multiple questions regarding 911 and being handed and reviewing the Open Bentham Journal Nano-thermite paper, was tempted to gossip about what he really knew. He went from “WTC 7 filled with fuel” statement in the beginning to “30 years conspiracy” in the end. He was essentially conditioned by WACLU like dropping a frog in water and gradually warming it up.


............. I am so sorry you had your b*lls cut off. I would have thought this would have made you bitter.


You guys never cease to amaze me. You all are a really polished team that should be admired and emulated.

You'll probably beat us all to the punch, but we need to repeat exactly what you did with the nano-thermite paper, filming and all, with each and every commissioner -- and other commission staff as well. Maybe then they'll realize that we're not fucking around.

PUT IT IN THEIR HANDS AND FILM IT. I loved it when Katy walked up to the podium and handed it to him, saying basically "here, read this (ed. you moron)." Unfortunately, ex-commissioners don't come to Boston. But if and when they do, I'll remember this and we'll try to follow in your footsteps.


Please take this as it is intended, a thank you for what you are doing with some constructive criticism.

Jeremy, very polite and intelligent but too long getting to the point. I suggest you shorten your [well crafted] segway and land heavy in the indisputable proof that WTC 7 was a CD, the free fall acceleration verified by NIST in their final report. Know all the details by heart and don't leave him [whoever] any wiggle room. You have gotten very good at public speaking and you are decidedly more effective lately.

Katy, Excellent!!! Simple, polite, nice business suit and hair do, just hand him the paper. Couldn't be better.

Bruno, good points but too long. People are put off by speeches and talking about many things gives them lots of wiggle room. Know your end point and question. Narrow the focus as much as possible. A compliment like "Thank you for your service" puts the person at ease and the audience on your side.
How do you sleep at night? is counterproductive.

Hard to hear Dan Noel but it was polite and he gave Kerrey a handout and I hope a BFT DVD.

Then the line that makes the day and tells the whole story.

Bob: "The problem is, it's a 30 year old conspiracy."
Jeremy: No, I'm talking about 9/11.
Bob: That's what I'm talking about.

Ho-lee-shit! That's a gift. The dam of silence is breaking. Persistence and politeness net results.

Have someone clean up the sound as much as possible and spread that 10 seconds far and wide. Major accomplishment. Go WACLA!!!

If you ever see him again, thank him and ask if he could expand a little on that.

Assume they are on our side [even if only a few are] and you will get more results like that. Let them give you what they can.

Thanks for the constructive critique

I will respond to your input in regards to my 'speech.' I understand your criticism, and I agree in general, but I think you are ignoring the results that we got. Rather than putting him at ease with a 'Thank you for your service' (which actually sours the mood of most Vets, because that's what the government says to them as it abandons them to homelessness), I instead attempted to open his heart by connecting with his humanness in regards to his son (who happened to be born on Sept 10, 2001), and put everything into context of how it affects the world his son is growing up in.

The structure of my speech was based on words from Kerrey's speech. I purposely used his words and concepts so as to maintain a large degree of relevance to the moment in the eyes and ears of the audience. Each aspect of the story I told - details of torture, genocide against Muslims, destruction of the Constitution certainly made everybody uncomfortable, and they would rather not hear it, but they did hear it, and they could not ignore it. Those in front of me turned around, those to the side of me turned to me, and everybody listened to what I was saying (the same goes for Jeremy, who really looks sharp with his new hair cut! and Katy who created an intense dramatic effect by walking in her sharp outfit and high heels to deliver the nano-thermite paper to Kerrey without any demands, and Kerrey just had to read it... why did he just have to read it?). We all did our best to reach out to the people around us on a personal level. We were not on a soap box spouting our politics, but rather we were in a room with our neighbors cutting right through monumental taboos and putting each person's morality-conscience on notice.

When I heard groans in the audience, I acknowledged them "You can bemoan this all you want" and looked at them, but continued with my outreach to Kerrey. I spoke from my heart. The 'How can you live with yourself?' line and 'How do you sleep at night?' line were a throwback to Sabrina Rivera who had asked Giuliani the same question a couple of years ago to extreme effect, and it also brought the moment back to where I had started which was in reference to Kerrey's son... and mine. I was not looking for any answers about the truth from Kerrey. I gave the truth, and I was asking him to take responsibility for the consequences his son has to face because of Kerrey's participation in the whitewash (treasonous) coverup of 9-11. I have to believe he took it to heart because he began to back track on the 9-11 Commission and to make excuses for why the Commission could not, and did not do it's job.

Speaking truth to power in an audience who would rather be comforted in their inoculated, televised view of the world has an intensity that is difficult to describe. I am grateful to have had another opportunity (thanks goes to Christian who gave us a heads-up to Kerrey being in town, and bought us dinner! thanks brother) to reach out to an audience some of whom are uncomfortable with the truth, and to be in a group who tag-teamed and dominated the Q&A experience in that auditorium. We turned that event into an event about the truth of 9-11. Paul, who focused on documenting the event and did not speak up in the Q&A, told us afterward that as he walked around during the reception, and listened to the people who spoke freely to each other because they did not know he was with us, heard almost all of them talking about our questions regarding 9-11.

With you in the struggle,
WeAreChangeLA -
I work for the 9-11 First Responders, the 9-11 victims, and all those who are being slaughtered and tortured because of 9-11.

Thank you

For your thoughtful reply. I can see your point even if I don't agree with it. As long as it's respectful and you are aware of the audience reaction around you, I support you.

I went to a meet and greet with Amy Goodman and did it "my way". I just happened to find out about her being in Sacramento by chance. You guys seem to know when these people are making public appearances. Please let me know when people in the government and media are going to be in Sac. and I will confront them and try to get it on video.

WACLA is an inspiration to us all.

With you in the struggle,


Wow! That was great work

I was just blown away by how you guys handled that situation. When I'm attacked like that I always have a hard time controlling my frustration and anger, but you guys were totally cool and just kept laying out the evidence. And it really paid off. My hat is off to you.

What motivates the ongoing cover-up?

With the OCT so laughably disproven and the evidence supporting a darker truth so blatant, and so many political leaders apparently "in the know" I find myself wondering how and why people like Kerrey, who's not even in office any longer, continue to hold the line. I have concluded that they must believe it would be too damaging to the very Union of the nation for the truth to come out. And perhaps it would. Could the good ol' US of A actually survive this? Certainly people in the movement have pondered what the collapse of the 9/11 house of cards would portend. Is it possible that Bob Kerrey was abhored when he learned the truth, but chose to cover it up in the interest of preserving the union? I can't think of any other reason why so many obstensibly patriotic Americans would participate in the charade.

Seems to me 911 could be

Seems to me 911 could be 9/11 of 1973.
Kissinger has gone on record to say that in 1971(30 years before 911/ 2001) he was directed by president Nixon to facilitate a coup d'etat in Chile.

The coup was executed and Allende Murdered on 911 (1973) and replaced by Pinochet's fascist regime with wholesale American imperialist economic policies imported .

The following from : Friedman, Pinochet and the "Chilean Miracle"
A personal essay in hypertext by Scott Bidstrup

"Why this is relevant today is that the Pinochet regime in Chile was a testing ground for much of the economic doctrine that is put in place today around the world, often by force, at the behest of the World Bank, the World Trade Organization, the International Monetary Fund, the Inter-American Development Bank, and soon, the Free-Trade Agreement of the Americas. These organizations have, for years, been implementing policies around the world that were first tried in Chile. And the results of these policies have long been apparent. Of greater importance to Americans, is that these policies are now being implemented in the United States. We will soon experience what Chile has now experienced for a generation. It is important for us to know what the results have been, because we are embarking on the same road ourselves."