My Constitutionally-mandated Opposition to President Obama’s Treasonous Afghanistan Policy- aired on CSPAN on 12/2/09

CSPAN's Washington Journal @ ~19 min.
December 2, 2009- The Morning after President Obama's Afghanistan Escalation Speech

Tape of Obama’s speech: “This vast and diverse citizenry will not always agree on every issue, nor should we. But I also know that we as a country cannot sustain our leadership, nor navigate the momentous challenges of our time, if we allow ourselves to be split asunder by the same rancor and cynicism, and partisanship that has in recent times poisoned our national discourse.

It’s easy to forget that when this war began, we were united, bound together by the fresh memory of a horrific attack, and by the determination to defend our homeland and the values we hold dear. I refuse to accept the notion that we cannot summon that unity again…”

CSPAN host Robb Harleston: Some of the split that the President was talking to is referred to in this morning’s Wall Street Journal with this headline: “Critics From Across the Spectrum Rip Plan: Some of Obama’s most loyal backers denounce escalation despite quick draw-down designs, signaling political troubles ahead.”

Next up, Columbus Georgia- James, supports the President.

James: Yes sir.

CSPAN host: Go ahead James.

James: Sir, I’m an NCO in the Army right now.

CSPAN host: Yes?

James: And it bothers me that the American people are not following our President, because we’re trained to follow our leaders, no matter right, wrong or indifferent.

CSPAN host: There’s an article, James, in this morning’s New York Times talking about the strain of military service meets the resolve to go on. And in it, they quote a Colonel Viet Luong, who’s the commander of the 3rd Brigade, one of the Army’s most deployed divisions. He says, “It’s tough to go on another deployment, but for us, it’s another mission and we embrace the opportunity to be able to accomplish our mission and do the jobs that we came in the army to do.” Your thoughts.

James: Yes sir, I totally agree. And that’s the thing. Being an NCO, I’m a leader myself. And I must, no matter what, I gotta make sure my troops are ready.

And it bothers me that the American people don’t follow. And no matter if they dislike or like what he does, because, you know, me, as a leader, I have to take my troops into combat and do what I’m told. And that’s just what I do.

CSPAN host: Have you been deployed to either Iraq or Afghanistan, James?

James: I’ve been there twice sir.

CSPAN host: To Afghanistan?

James: To Iraq sir.

CSPAN host: Ok. Any- Do you know if there are any plans in the pipeline for you to be part of that 30 thousand’s that’s going to Afghanistan.

James: I’m not sure right now sir.

CSPAN host: Ok, thanks for your call. Let’s move on to Los Angeles- Jeremy opposes the President’s proposal.

Jeremy: I prop— I oppose the President’s proposal because I support and defend the Constitution. And I would remind the previous service member who called that the first duty, oath— that was part of the oath that he took- was to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, and then, secondly, to follow all orders, if they are lawful. And the reason that I think that opposing the President is to defend the Constitution is because I am looking at historical fact and scientific fact very clearly about where terrorism comes from. And it looks clear that Obama is following his predecessor George W. Bush in committing what, under Article III Section 3 of the Constitution, is defined as treason, giving aid and comfort to the enemies who attacked us on 9/11.

And I would just point out the clear and convincing proof of multiple evidence strains of these buildings being brought down in controlled demolitions with living human beings in them—from the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, over a thousand of them, multi—numerous civil and structural engineers, and then, finally, this paper, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in the Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center…” Anyone can go find it. I, personally, have indicated its presence to the Attorney General, to the Vice President, to Senators and Representatives on both Judiciary and Intelligence Committees, and to my own Congressperson. None of them have disputed the science. None of them will actually respond in any coherent manner. So it is time for the American people and the American soldiers to do their duty and to speak the truth.


It's remarkable that the elite are so confident in the ignorance of the American people they allow their pathetic puppet to tout the tired "Smoke 'em Out" mentality. The gall is unending.


We are getting so many messages from WACLA members in praise of Jeremy for his call in to CSPAN’s Washington Journal as he brilliantly lays out a powerful and effective message to all Americans and our military troops regarding the Constitution and 9-11 Truth. Jeremy follows a caller named James who has served in Iraq, and who calls on the American people to support the surge in Afghanistan regardless of how they feel about it because he feels it's just the right thing to do. Jeremy then addresses James and calls on him to support his oath to defend the Constitution. Jeremy goes on to tout and the nanothermite paper. This was a brilliant coup de tat of an attempted propaganda ploy on a popular live television show.

With you in the struggle,
WeAreChangeLA -
I work for the 9-11 First Responders, the 9-11 victims, and all those who are being slaughtered and tortured because of 9-11.


WACLA does excellent work.

I love seeing all these great public interactions!! Thanks guys

"It is you who are the torch-bearers with respect to that truth.... ...Steel your spines. Inspire your children. Then when the moment is right, rise again...." W PEPPER

Superb example of...

how to step up to the plate with a clear and calmly formatted statement, that is anchored in evidence and point of fact. Wow. For me, it is a valuable lesson in how to "bring it and sling it". Content, tone, delivery - four stars.

I noticed that the anchorman did no small amount of stuttering while processing Jeremy's statement and attempting to move on to the next matter at hand. The effects of interjecting that type of message into that type of forum are, I believe, a very important component of our mission. Thank you Jeremy.



"Few victories can rival the initial one of parting company with the spectators and stepping into the arena" - Stewart Howe

constitution and a citizen's actions

great post. among all the media and government perversions of doublespeak.. i wanted to add about a campaign by one of the signers of's petition, by forensic engineer, Don Meserlian:

excerpt from Citizens Campaign For 9-11 Truth:

"Based on the first amendment to the U.S. Constitution, "The right to petition" contains an implied "obligation to respond" otherwise the "right to petition" is a meaningless right. The "Oath of Office" that every official takes states that they will "uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution". Violation of the "Oath of Office" by public officials is an act of treason per United States code 18USC Par. 2382, misprision of treason.

The Wikipedia definition of "Oath of Office" states: "Under the laws of a state it may be considered treason or a high crime to betray a sworn oath of office." This is the basis for the need of officials to respond to a petition by either signing the petition or providing a valid written reason for not signing. Betraying the Oath of Office is perjury; a felony.

WTC 7 collapsed into its own footprint on 9/11/01 even though it was not struck by a plane as was WTC 1 & 2. NIST has attributed the cause of the three collapses to fire although no skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire in 100 years. Donald Meserlian P.E. has submitted Pogo Proclamation 200803 to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST} proving that a controlled demolition caused the collapse of WTC 7 and petitioned NIST, based on the first amendment to the U.S. Constitution, to respond to the petition. NIST has refused to abide by the Constitution and specify the true cause of the collapse of WTC 7. NIST's final WTC 7 report disregards the evidence of controlled demolition presented by the many scientists and engineers who responded to their draft report."

More on the hard evidence of the government's own records are posted here:


This campaign should be considered at this time, since the vote for answers campaign in NYC was axed by another misuse of money and perversion to democracy by Bloomberg and NYC puppet city council.

i feel connected to this post, too, since boiling over with frustrations.. i channeled this poem and hope it gets distributed to challenge the naked emperor and those he represents.. certainly not the people of the world.. but an elite group following up on the Bush false flag operation agenda..

abomination obama nation


What gets me

is how many people that phoned in still believe the "Official Story". I guess even if the NWO boys confessed to 9/11 people would still believe the "Official Story" It is so sad. It's like we are living in Orwell's 1984.

This won't be another Viet Nam.

Don't you love this little game of ring-around-the-rosie? I thought it was IRAQ that wouldn't be another Viet Nam. LOL!! They are recycling Bush's same tired misdirection. They are using these two wars as alternating points of focus in order to extend the American public's "OK, we're fed up" threshold. As soon as people begin to really crow about Afghanistan, they'll let it take a back seat to Iraq again. Then our "travesty tolerance level" will be reset a bit lower, because after all, we haven't heard about Iraq for so long. Oh, and I wonder just what is going on in Iraq while they are waving Afghanistan in our faces? Don't let them play you like this. They want your head bouncing back and forth between Iraq and Afghanistan like you are following a tennis match. Imagine what kind of shell game they will be able to play once Pakistan and Iran get into full swing. Consider the "9/11 Wars" as one agenda, one regional occupation. After all, that is how "THEY" look at it. The goal is to assimilate and bring to heel an entire region and entire culture. The goal is to control ALL of the resources of that region (oil, opium, people, etc.) and direct those energies toward the furtherance of world government.

They are using the big bull-horn of the media to try to control HOW YOU THINK about the issues. Don't be played like the sheeple. The fight here is Truth and rule of Law, vs. utter and total corruption. The front is united.
"Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without." - Buddha
"What you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." - Gandhi
"The Sun never shined on a cause of greater worth." - Thomas Paine