US wouldn’t kill our own citizens, blame Iran, and start a war! Oh? FBI allowed ’93 WTC bombing

hyperlinks and videos live at source:

We know that the US “leadership” and corporate media are lying for war with Iran with their two principle reasons:

1.Anyone who spends five minutes can verify that Iran’s President Ahmadinejad never threatened to attack or destroy Israel. The content and context of his October 2005 speech is in support of Palestinian equal treatment under the law from Israel and compares the Israeli government to former repressive regimes in Iran, the USSR, and Iraq that were all replaced. I challenge anyone to summarize the paragraph in question and rationally conclude any physical threat to Israel. The implications of this fact are world-changing: the proof of Orwellian lies for war with Iran by criminal conspiracy between both political parties’ management and corporate media is beyond any doubt.
2.Iran has never diverted nuclear material from legal and peaceful use; verified by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in all their reports and testified by their agency directors. The agency seems under political pressure from the US; as votes and official language ignore the facts and purpose of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) to voice concern over what isn’t known. This is as if your supervisor threatened to fire you, saying, “We can verify that you haven’t stolen anything from our observation and accounting of all materials. However, you can’t prove that you haven’t stolen things outside our accounting and observation that we don’t know about. Prove your intentions are to not steal. If you can’t, our suspicions are verified.” This reason concerns “Additional Protocol” that Iran gave administrative agreement to without verification from their legislators, and then withdrew from when the US wouldn’t keep their part of NPT to support Iran’s nuclear energy development.

We also know that all the reasons given to go to war with Iraq were not only false, but known as false at the time they were told.

This is huge. It's legal treason against the United States.

This fact puts the lies with Iran in context that our “leadership” are psychopaths: vicious killers with only a veneer of social behavior to hide their sadistic and destructive actions. The sane response is to stop these psychopaths right now through government and military refusal for further orders pertaining to these unlawful wars, arrest those who issue this war policy, and I recommend Truth and Reconciliation to get to the bottom of what’s at the core of this Orwellian dystopia America has become.

A real risk is the start of World War 3.

Given the rules of war prohibit US and/or Israel attack from the lame lies the psychopaths are pushing, an historical card the US and other governments have played to temporarily “shock and awe” the American public into obedience for war is a false flag attack to kill Americans, blame the target for war, and then attack.

Despite the historical reality of false flag operations, the history of the known lies that have killed a million of our fellow human beings in Iraq, and the elementary school-level lies to attack Iran, some Americans are still too naïve to accept the fact that our psychopathic “leaders” of both parties (always protected by their minions in corporate media) would play “real chess” and sacrifice what they see as American pawns in order to achieve a broader psychopathic policy objective, like ruling the Middle East.

A fact to dispel this illusion is an obvious example of our government killing Americans in a false flag attack: in 1993, the New York Times reported (and here) that the FBI had stopped their informant from providing a fake explosive to terrorists who blew-up a truck bomb in the World Trade Center parking lot. Instead, an FBI supervisor took over the supply of the explosive to the terrorists. The FBI informant, Emad Salem, suspected foul play by the FBI and secretly recorded hundreds of hours of what the FBI assumed was their private conversations. The recordings confirm that the FBI provided the explosives for the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center that killed six, wounded over 1,000, but was insufficient to collapse one tower onto the other to achieve the objective of the bombing.

The CBS News coverage reporting the above facts is in the video below.

Why would an FBI “supervisor” take over this part of what Mr. Salem was told was a “sting operation” to provide the actual explosives for terrorism and then allow this FBI-managed crime to murder Americans with the potential to bring down the two World Trade Center buildings?

We know the FBI and whoever else was involved wanted the attack to occur because they managed its execution every step of the way to the explosion. We know they could have stopped the attack and didn’t. Therefore this attack is a false flag operation where the FBI is the brains and management but the blame and responsibility is solely placed on Islamic terrorists. This part seems clear.

Placing this operation into the broader strategy of political objectives; that is, proving the sacrifice of this chess piece was part of a particular plan to control the chess board is more complex. However, given the paper-thin lies that we see from the highest levels of US government for war with Iran and Iraq documented in the links of this article (among hundreds of writers), we know that the “leadership” of both political parties are dominated by chess players willing to sacrifice thousands of American soldiers in their game.

We know the 1993 WTC bombing occurred just after many of the Bush Administration “leaders” put the plan of Middle East domination into writing in 1992 with the pre-development of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). The conclusion is reasonable that the 1993 bombing was a false flag operation to move PNAC’s agenda forward for Middle East domination by creating public outrage that would overcome the blatant illegality of Middle East wars.

These psychopathic chess players might be planning one more false flag move for their final board objective: attacking and dominating Iran.

If a critical mass of leadership among the public, US military, US government, and other key areas refuse to cooperate with this ongoing game our chess masters are playing, we can end it and shift our attention to more constructive uses of our resources. My policy suggestions follow.

Please share this article with all who can benefit. If you appreciate my work, please subscribe by clicking under the article title (it’s free). Please use my archive of work to help build a brighter future.

I appreciate your attention to these facts and encourage your further study and action consistent with your own self-expression. My recommendations:

Policy response: Gandhi and Martin Luther King advocated public understanding of the facts and non-cooperation with evil. I’m among hundreds who advocate:
1.Understand the laws of war (and here). These were legislated after WW2 and are crystal-clear that only self-defense, in a narrow legal meaning, can justify war. The current US wars are not even close to being lawful and are legal treason against the US. Those involved with US military, government, and law enforcement have an oath to protect and defend the US Constitution. To fulfill their oath they must immediately refuse all orders associated with unlawful wars and military-related constant violation of treaties, and arrest those who issue unlawful orders. The Oath of Enlistment to the US Constitution supersedes the fascist insertion of Nazi propaganda to "always place the mission first" of blindly following unlawful orders.
2.Employ the obvious and simple solutions to end our economic controlled demolition and evolve to a civil economy. End poverty through global cooperation to achieve the UN Millennium Goals by developed countries investing 0.7% of their income (not that the UN is serious for their accomplishment, but the goals are what we should invest to produce). Support global security through cooperation, dignity, justice, and freedom. Create a US Department of Peace to help.
3.Communicate. Trust your unique, beautiful, and powerful self-expression to share as you feel appropriate. Understand that while many people are ready to embrace difficult facts, many are not. Anticipate that you will be attacked and prepare your virtuous response in the spirit of competition, just as you do in other fields.
4.Prosecute the war leaders for obvious violation of the letter and spirit of US war laws and constant lies to engage in further wars. Because the crimes are so broad and deep, I recommend Truth and Reconciliation (T&R) to exchange full truth and return of stolen US assets for non-prosecution. This is the most expeditious way to understand and end all unlawful and harmful acts. Those who reject T&R are subject to prosecution.

Local perspective: Part of my professional duties as a teacher of economics and government is to produce competent adult citizenry. This includes realization that our nation’s policies and money are managed at a broad community level, and these issues have tremendous local impact. Of course, we all want human beings to be individually successful and enjoy their unique, beautiful and powerful self-expressions. Concurrently, we recognize our commitment to local success is strongly dependent upon the success of the community, and that government policy and economics are drivers.

Our status in early 21st Century human history is that we suffer from a long history in government and money of human interrelationship well-described as vicious antagonism. Governments frequently use war as a foreign policy, despite its illegality and dependent upon public ignorance, with horrific consequences. Economic policy is still created within a “Robber Baron” paradigm to concentrate money to an elite few families. Two examples:

1. National taxes effect you dearly, especially the tax to pay interest on the national debt. This costs the American public over $400 billion every year. This is $4,000 per year for every $50,000 of income. Do the math to understand your household’s tax burden for a monetary policy invented by banks for banks to create our money supply as debt. Your competence in this area contributes to our collective voice to simply shift monetary policy to easily pay the national debt, enjoy full employment, collectively save us over a trillion dollars every year, and finally realize what our brightest American minds have been advocating for centuries beginning with Benjamin Franklin. This would have unprecedented local benefits, and requires collective power to accomplish.
2. Ending poverty everywhere on our planet would cost just 0.7% of our income and save a million children’s lives every month. This human accomplishment will cause unimaginable joy at our local level.

To consider:

"If we are to have peace on earth, our loyalties must become ecumenical rather than sectional. Our loyalties must transcend our race, our tribe, our class, and our nation; and this means we must develop a world perspective. No individual can live alone, no nation can live alone and as long as we try, the more we are going to have war in the world. Now the judgment of God is upon us and we must either learn to live together as brothers or we are all going to perish together as fools."
--Inscription on Dr. Martin Luther King’s statue, Moorehouse College, Atlanta

"The day that hunger is eradicated from the earth, there will be the greatest spiritual explosion the world has ever known. Humanity cannot imagine the joy that will burst into the world on the day of that great revolution." -- poet Federico García Lorca

Method To The Madness

I wrote an article on the 1993 WTC attack at last June. The article also discussed the 1995 Murrah Federal building attack in Oklahoma City, the bombings of our embassies in Africa in 1998, etc. These attacks began AFTER the "collapse" of the USSR for a reason. The perpetrators are, of course, sociopaths, but that doesn't mean that their sociopathic behavior is devoid of policy.

Below is the article I wrote (You can read or listen to Salem's secretly taped conversation with FBI Special Agent John Anticev by going to End Note 4. The big surprise in the article is the last paragraph. Look who shows up again in 1998, five years after we last heard of him in connection with the 1993 WTC bombing.):

June 3, 2009

The World Trade Center Attacks in Perspective

On October 27, 1993 the New York Times revealed that the FBI were in a much better position than previously known regarding events leading up to that year’s February 26 bombing of the World Trade Center’s north tower.1 The story broke thanks to the hundreds of hours of secret recordings made by FBI informer Emad A. Salem of conversations he had with FBI personnel.

Emad A. Salem, a former lieutenant colonel in the Egyptian army, arrived in the United States in 1988 and soon began working for the FBI as an informant.2 Initially Salem was assigned the task of infiltrating the Russian Mafia in New York City, focusing on the crime organization’s links to the KGB.3 In mid-June of 1992 Salem had penetrated the group responsible for the bombing of the World Trade Center. The group was having difficulties with securing remote bomb detonators (the need for more than one detonator was due to the terrorist’s plans to bomb other targets besides the World Trade Center), so Salem offered to build the bombs for them. Interestingly, not only was the bomb for the World Trade Center built by Salem, but built under the supervision of the FBI and the D.A., according to tape recordings Salem made secretly of conversations between him and his FBI handlers:

"Salem: Okay. Alright. I don't think it was. If that's what you think guys, fine, but I don't think that because we was start already building the bomb which is went off in the World Trade Center. It was built by supervising supervision from the Bureau and the D.A. and we was all informed about it and we know that the bomb start to be built. By who? By your confidential informant. What a wonderful, great case!

Anticev: Well."4

Anticev is FBI Special Agent John Anticev, one of Salem’s Bureau contacts before and after the WTC bombing. Anticef’s response of "Well" is confirmation that what Salem has just said in reference to the bomb being a product of the FBI is true.5

This is quite an eye raising admission; that the bomb that tore the North Tower’s basement apart was built by the FBI! Hold on. Here is where the story raises both eyebrows. The FBI had agreed to substitute harmless powder in the bomb, but then changed their minds and provided a real bomb, and then failed to follow the terrorists and catch them in the act of attempting to destroy the North Tower:

"He requested to meet me in the hotel," Mr. Salem says of the supervisor. "He requested to make me to testify and if he didn't push for that, we'll be going building the bomb with a phony powder and grabbing the people who was involved in it. But since you, we didn't do that."6

The tapes even recount that Salem had given the FBI the day and time for the delivery of the bomb:

"You were informed. Everything is ready. The day and the time. Boom. Lock them up and that's that. That's why I feel so bad."7

However there’s more that Salem claims he told the FBI about the bombing. He provided the actual location of the bombing:

"I told you so, that this is one of the targets," Mr. Salem says. "You forgot. You have your papers. Go back to it. World Trade Center, Empire State Building, Grand Central. Times Square."8

"I looked over my notes," one of the agents, John Anticev, says. "I didn't see anything about a target." To this, Detective Napoli, says: "I was there also. I don't remember you saying target."9

Now the FBI never contradicted Salem in the tapes saying he didn’t provide them with the day and time for the delivery of the bomb to the terrorists, just the targets. Even if Salem was confused about providing the targets to the FBI, the fact remains that the FBI did not follow the terrorists to the World Trade Center's north tower on February 26th when they knew that the terrorists were in the possession of a real bomb. A bomb the FBI gave the terrorists! Why?

The Reagan and Bush I administrations wanted Congress to pass anti-terror legislation with unconstitutional provisions that included the "resurrection of guilt by association, association as grounds for exclusion or deportation, the ban on supporting lawful activities of groups labeled terrorist, the use of secret evidence, and the empowerment of the Secretary of State to designate groups as terrorist organizations, without judicial or congressional review."10 The legislation languished in Congress, with both Democrat and Republican members of the House Judiciary Committee questioning the need for such drastic legislation.11 Not even the 1993 WTC bombing was a good enough reason to convince Congress to pass the ‘anti-terror’ legislation (only six were killed). However the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995 changed the political atmosphere on this issue (168 were killed). The next year the anti-terror legislation became law.

In the Murrah Federal Building bombing incident it is known that there were two other bombs located in the building that were larger than the initial bomb that exploded. This news was suppressed by the national media, but managed to leak out through the local media in Oklahoma City.12 The unexploded bombs are not to be confused with the TOW antitank missile that was revealed seven years after the incident to have been found during the Murrah Federal Building rescue operations.13 Since the two bombs found were said by the authorities to be larger than the first that exploded, then one of those bombs could not have been a TOW missile, since a TOW missile would not come anywhere close to destroying one-third of the Murrah Federal Building. Furthermore, the Oklahoma City media reported authorities saying two bombs larger than the first were found, not one bomb with less destructive power than the bomb that went off. The FBI also refused the testimonies of 22 eyewitnesses that contradicted the official narrative of the Oklahoma City bombing.14

What we have then beginning in the early 1990s is a pattern of FBI malfeasance in both the 1993 WTC bombing and the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. The question is how far does this malfeasance go? Could the bombings actually have been FBI operations carried out by proxy groups? What would be the motive for such actions? The ramming through of unconstitutional ‘anti-terror’ legislation by Congress is in itself not an answer. If elements within the FBI were being used to set off bombs in the 1990s to compel Congress into passing anti-terror legislation, the same question still stands: Why?

The answer lies in what happened in 1991. Remember that year? 1991 should bring immediately to mind a pivotal event from that year: the supposed collapse of the USSR. Why do I say supposed? Because the USSR did not collapse in December 1991, it fractured itself for strategic deception purposes only. The USSR is still around, though no one talks about it.15 That is why ‘former’ communists continue to be ‘elected’ as the chief executives of the ‘former’ Soviet republics, including ex-KGB officer Vladimir Putin. This alternative view of Russia’s true identity accounts for the recent "Cold War" rhetoric between the United States and Russia, and belies the real motive behind the United States’ intention to deploy elements of the US strategic missile defense system in Poland.16

The 1993 WTC bombing, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, the bombings of the American embassies in Africa in 1998, the 2000 USS Cole bombing in Yemen and finally the 9/11 attacks were all false-flag operations setting the stage for the encirclement of the USSR and their ally the Peoples Republic of China. Because certain elements inside and outside of the government wish to maintain a strong, offensive-capable military presence in the world to counter the still present USSR, a series of self-inflicted violent actions were committed right after the ‘collapse’ of the USSR in 1991 to:

1. allow the government greater latitude in its surveillance and incarceration powers at home; and

2. create a new false enemy abroad (Al Queada) as a cover for the war that still exists between the West and the USSR.

While a strong military offensive capability is necessary to protect the Republic, murdering innocent civilians to implement a foreign policy objective is treason, as is sending abroad a large percentage of our military personnel to far off isolated areas where they can be easily surrounded and destroyed by our enemies when our enemies are ready to pounce. No wonder then that the so-called neo-cons that infested the Bush II administration were called the "crazies in the basement" before they took power in 2001. Will the new administration in Washington, D. C. bring a change to America’s foreign policy, and bring our military forces home to protect the Republic? As long as the real reason for the so-called War on Terror is shrouded in a veil of official silence, the foreign policy of Bush II will continue unabated, leaving America insecure at home.

I now direct the reader’s attention back to FBI Special Agent John Anticev. Due to his smashing performance five years earlier in the 1993 WTC bombing incident, Anticev was assigned to investigate the 1998 American embassy bombings in Africa!17




3.Washington Post, 8/26/1993


or listen to the recording between Emad Salem and FBI SA John Anticev (fast forward to 3:00 minutes):

5.As a matter of fact, Salem got SA Anticef to affirm on tape that Salem never falsified information:

or listen to the recording between Emad Salem and FBI SA John Anticev (fast forward to 7:10 minutes):




9. Ibid.






15. Golitsyn, Anatoliy. New Lies for Old. Dodd, Mead. 1984

Read the book:

and by the same author:

The Perestroika Deception: Memoranda to the Central Intelligence Agency. Edward Harle Limited; 2nd edition. 1998

16. to-Poland.html

Dean Jackson/Editor-in-Chief
Washington, DC
Addendum --

For those of you not familiar with KGB defector Major Anatoliy Golitsyn, I strongly suggest you become so. Interestingly, one will not see this defector on the lecture tour, nor will the media cover him and his impeccable predictions.


Great article. I put a link for it in my article.

We hold these truths to be self-evident...



a comment to your article made by Hmmm says:

'"The first reference is a highly selective abridgement of the actual NY Times piece, most notably missing this graf:

The transcripts do not make clear the extent to which Federal authorities knew that there was a plan to bomb the World Trade Center, merely that they knew that a bombing of some sort was being discussed. But Mr. Salem's evident anguish at not being able to thwart the trade center blast is a recurrent theme in the transcripts. In one of the first numbered tapes, Mr. Salem is quoted as telling agent Floyd: "Since the bomb went off I feel terrible. I feel bad. I feel here is people who don't listen."

That sounds more like he's complaining the Feebs wouldn't listen to him, not that they knew and deliberately allowed it to happen.

Anyone who has experienced the arrogance and bull-headedness of the FBI should find that credible."'

I replied to Hmmm with the following comment:

"the FBI knew that the terrorists were in the position of an operational bomb, and didn't follow them to the WTC and arrest them before they planted the bomb. That's what the FBI does; it's their job!

The fact that the New York Times didn't make this obvious point clear to its readership is further evidence of how the media then and now covers for the Federal government when elements within the Federal government commit crimes."

Why do you think Hmmm didn't figure this out for himself/herself? I think I know why!

Dean Jackson/Editor-in-Chief
Washington, DC
Addendum --


If you liked my article on the WTC bombings, then take a look at my current article on NORAD posted at Wait till you see what I found last month in The 9/11 Commission Report.


Thank you for your work in so many areas. Hmmm is obvious PSYOPS/Operation Mockingbird or whatever they call themselves today. Feel free to mix it up with him on the comments. I'm going after him in a moment with part of your article.

Yes, I'd love to write on 9/11 but it's the only topic my wife forbids. She's intuitive and correct 90%+ of the time (actually the last time she was really wrong was feeling the Red Sox weren't ready to win the World Series), and feels that topic would put our family in danger. So I wrote an academic piece putting the best evidence together from both sides and stopped-short of the analysis to add two and two together for the readers. It's here if you haven't seen it; my intent is use for public high school lessons, but I haven't gotten any feedback that it's ever been used :(

Who are 9/11 Truthers? What is the 9/11 Truth Movement?

We hold these truths to be self-evident...

Stay Neutral


then remain neutral, if your wife is adamant about it (and you're a high school teacher to boot, so more the imperative to stay neutral).

However, there’s nothing preventing you from pointing out (in a neutral fashion, of course) what The 9/11 Commission Report admits about NORAD radar personnel actually looking for or watching Flights 11, 77, 93 and Delta 1989 on their radar. The quotes could be incorporated into a section on "NORAD and 9/11". Here are two more quotes (one from the Air Force and one from NORAD itself) that categorically deny that NORAD watched American skies at all, including domestic AND foreign aircraft:

In 2004 the Air Force said, "Before 2001, 1st Air Force was charged with keeping an eye on the nation’s borders, usually looking for threats in the form of Russian aircraft skirting too close for comfort to the mainland. In those few hours, the command’s mission went from looking outward to looking inward."

In 2008 NORAD said, "Since the tragic events of 9/11, NORAD’s role which previously was outward-looking now includes monitoring airspace within North America."

Contradicting the above quotes from the Air Force and NORAD is the following 1994 passage from a Government Accountability Office report:

"NORAD defines air sovereignty as providing surveillance and control of the territorial airspace, which includes:

1. intercepting and destroying uncontrollable air objects;

2. tracking hijacked aircraft;

3. assisting aircraft in distress;

4. escorting Communist civil aircraft; and

5. intercepting suspect aircraft, including counterdrug operations and peacetime military intercepts."

Download the GAO report on NORAD, Continental Air Defense: A Dedicated Force Is No Longer Needed, at

Dean Jackson/Editor-in-Chief
Washington, DC