9/11 on LewRockwell.com

It's encouraging to see that Lew Rockwell is beginning to address 9/11 forthrightly.

State Crimes Against Democracy by Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff

New research in the journal American Behavioral Scientist (Sage publications, February 2010) addresses the concept of “State Crimes Against Democracy” (SCAD). …

Sometimes even new academic research goes largely unreported when the work contradicts prevailing understandings of recent historical events. A specific case of unreported academic research is the peer-reviewed journal article from Open Chemical Physics Journal (Volume 2, 2009), entitled “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust for the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe.” In the abstract the authors write, “We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.” Thermite is a pyrotechnic composition of a metal powder and a metal oxide which produces an aluminothermic reaction known as a thermite reaction and is used in controlled demolitions of buildings.

National Medal of Science recipient (1999) Professor Lynn Margulis from the Department of Geosciences at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst is one of many academics who supports further open investigative research in the collapse of the World Trade Center towers. Margulis recently wrote in Rock Creek Free Press, “all three buildings were destroyed by carefully planned, orchestrated and executed controlled demolition.” Richard Gage, AIA, architect and founder of the non-profit Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Inc. (AE911Truth), announced a decisive milestone February 19, 2010 at a press conference in San Francisco, CA. More than 1,000 architects and engineers worldwide now support the call for a new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 at the World Trade Center complex on September 11, 2001.

Credible scientific evidence brings into question the possibility that some aspects of the events of 9/11 involved State Crimes Against Democracy. Psychologically this is a very hard concept for Americans to even consider. However, ignoring the issue in the context of multiple proven SCADs since World War II seems far more dangerous for democracy than the consequences of future scientific inquiry and transparent, fact-based investigative reporting. Anything short of complete, open discourse based on all the evidence about these critical issues in our society relating to the possible continuation of SCADs is simply a matter of censorship.

Full article with citations is here: www.lewrockwell.com/orig11/phillips-huff1.1.1.html

Great Development

Heretofore, the psychologically based articles I've seen on the web have attempted to portray questioners of the OTC as mentally unstable. Hopefully the American Behavioral Scientist's articles on SCADs will mark the turning point for the psychological and sociological communities. And if not, we now have links to point to when the next psychological hit piece appears.

Understanding 9/11 in the broader context of SCADs is insightful and helpful. We need every tool in our arsenal to defeat enemies of truth. And understanding them better than they understand us is imperative.

I applaud the work, clear thinking and open-mindedness of the American Behavioral Scientists.

Glad You Posted This

I just now hurried here from LRC to see if someone had posted this article yet, and, if not, then I was going to post it. I'm glad to see that you did (because I was starting to a little self-conscious being almost the only one to post LRC articles here). A couple of months ago I stated here that LRC has been slowly but surely broaching the topic of 9/11 conspiracy more frequently in at least the past half year or so.

It's another gauge of how far 9/11 Truth has come!

I'm also glad to meet someone else who perceived the shift at LRC. For the past few months I had seen a few scattered references, that were at least presented objectively, but this was a major breakthrough.

I think it’s part of a larger phenomenon, as Robert Rice mentioned in the thread on the Washington Post’s treatment of Fujita: “Is it just me or … Has 9/11 Truth just bifurcated into a whole new realm of dialogue, both globally and in the USA. Seems it’s suddenly everywhere all at once, the taboo subject going mainstream.”

The bottom line is: It’s becoming safer to question 9/11. All the work is starting to bear fruit! We’re reaching the critical mass, and it’s just matter of time before it all blows sky-high. This is the time to really step up our efforts and break on through to the other side!