[Huffington Post removed article Jesse Ventura] Title: For Some, the Search for What Really Happened on 9/11 Isn't Over

This line is not on the site, but still in their Page Source:
>>>meta name="description" content="Two weeks ago, more than one thousand architects and engineers signed a petition demanding that Congress begin a new investigation into the destruction of the World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11." <<<

Source: The Huffington Post
Authors: Jesse Ventura and Dick Russell
Posted: March 9, 2010 11:00 AM
Url: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jesse-ventura/for-some-the-search-for-w_b_491504.html

The Editors comment tells it all...

EDITOR'S NOTE: The Huffington Post's editorial policy, laid out in our blogger guidelines, prohibits the promotion and promulgation of conspiracy theories -- including those about 9/11. As such, we have removed this post.

Here's the full original article that got banned.

For Some, the Search for What Really Happened on 9/11 Isn't Over
Jesse Ventura – Tue Mar 9, 11:00 am ET

Read Jesse Ventura's other articles on HuffingtonPost.com

You didn't see anything about it in the mainstream media, but two weeks ago at a conference in San Francisco, more than one thousand architects and engineers signed a petition demanding that Congress begin a new investigation into the destruction of the World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11.

That's right, these people put their reputations in potential jeopardy because they don't buy the government's version of events. They want to know how 200,000 tons of steel disintegrated and fell to the ground in 11 seconds. They question whether the hijacked planes were responsible -- or whether it could have been a controlled demolition from inside that brought down the Twin Towers and Building 7.

Richard Gage, a member of the American Institute of Architects and the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, put it like this: "The official Federal Emergency Management [Agency] and National Institute of Standards and Technology reports provide insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers' destruction." He's especially disturbed by Building 7, whose 447 stories came down in "pure free-fall acceleration" that afternoon -- even though it was never hit by an aircraft.

This is a subject I take up in my new book, American Conspiracies, published this week by Skyhorse. An excerpt follows:

Some people have argued that the twin towers went down, within a half hour of one another, because of the way they were constructed. Well, those 425,000 cubic yards of concrete and 200,000 tons of steel were designed to hold up against a Boeing 707, the largest plane built at the time the towers were completed in 1973. Analysis had shown that a 707 traveling at 600 miles an hour (and those had four engines) would not cause major damage. The twin-engine Boeing 757s that hit on 9/11 were going 440 and 550 miles an hour.

Still, we are told that a molten, highly intense fuel mixture from the planes brought down these two steel-framed skyscrapers. Keep in mind that no other such skyscraper in history had ever been known to collapse completely due to fire damage. So could it actually have been the result of a controlled demolition from inside the buildings? I don't claim expertise about this, but I did work four years as part of the Navy's underwater demolition teams, where we were trained to blow things to hell and high water. And my staff talked at some length with a prominent physicist, Steven E. Jones, who says that a "gravity driven collapse" without demolition charges defies the laws of physics. These buildings fell, at nearly the rate of free-fall, straight down into their own footprint, in approximately ten seconds. An object dropped from the roof of the 110-story-tall towers would reach the ground in about 9.2 seconds. Then there's the fact that steel beams that weighed as much as 200,000 pounds got tossed laterally as far as 500 feet.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) started its investigation on August 21, 2002. When their 10,000-page-long report came out three years later, the spokesman said there was no evidence to suggest a controlled demolition. But Steven E. Jones also says that molten metal found underground weeks later is proof that jet fuel couldn't have been all that was responsible. I visited the site about three weeks after 9/11, with Governor Pataki and my wife Terry. It didn't mean anything to me at the time, but they had to suspend digging that day because they were running into heat pockets of huge temperatures. These fires kept burning for more than three months, the longest-burning structure blaze ever. And this was all due to jet fuel? We're talking molten metal more than 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit.

Probably the most conclusive evidence about a controlled demolition is a research paper (two years, nine authors) published in the peer-reviewed Open Chemical Physics Journal, in April 2009. In studying dust samples from the site, these scientists found chips of nano-thermite, which is a high-tech incendiary/explosive. Here's what the paper's lead author, Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen's chemistry department, had to say about the explosive that he's convinced brought down the Twin Towers and the nearby Building 7:

"Thermite itself dates back to 1893. It is a mixture of aluminum and rust-powder, which react to create intense heat. The reaction produces iron, heated to 2500 degrees Centigrade. This can be used to do welding. It can also be used to melt other iron. So in nano-thermite, this powder from 1893 is reduced to tiny particles, perfectly mixed. When these react, the intense heat develops much more quickly. Nano-thermite can be mixed with additives to give off intense heat, or serve as a very effective explosive. It contains more energy than dynamite, and can be used as rocket fuel."

Richard Gage is one of hundreds of credentialed architects and structural engineers who have put their careers on the line to point out the detailed anomalies and many implications of controlled demolition in the building collapses. As he puts it bluntly: "Once you get to the science, it's indisputable."

Purchase American Conspiracies on Amazon.com.

Read More: 9/11, 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists, Conspiracy Theories, Jesse Ventura, Richard Gage, World Trade Center

Thank you.

Gotta love the internet, censorship can only work so much.

These gatekeeping organizations are being well documented and they will be publicly disgraced in the end when the truth prevails.

EDIT: Man, these gatekeepers make my blood boil. Whoever was responsible for removing an article WRITTEN BY JESSE VENTURA HIMSELF deserves to be in jail for treason right next to Cheney.

Gotta love the internet, censorship can only work so much.

Like "radio free Europe" during the cold war, we now have the paradox of "internet free Americas" during the PNAC war.

Their are a lot of mistakes in the Govenors article?

Thanks for the info...and we should contact the Goveror about his errors...but I'm sure his staff will fix such!

Regards John

9/11 24/7 UNTIL JUSTICE!!

Thanks ;-) I was spending my

Thanks ;-)
I was spending my time to send it as an article....

I really like the way everybody is actively anticipating. Saw it before w/ previous articles. This is great co-operation. I guess things are starting to work on mainstream level. First in loudly rejecting, later in real reporting.

Also on Prison Planet

Huffington Post Sends Ventura Article to Memory Hole

It's fun to see how this article is becoming a source of inquisitiveness

Censored article Huffington Post found elswhere...

Sorry to 911Blogger's editor, but still good news.

Censored articles, especially when written by welknown figures, are - of course - a souce for curiosity. I just found the complete article and sent it again to 911Blogger.

This is the new source (before the editor will publish it here):

When editors from HP consider this stuff dangerous, I fully agree...

Ariana Concerned About Her Image

The Huffington Post is very hostile to questioning the events of 9/11. It's pretty clear now Arianna is more concerned about her image than anything else. She has shown her true colors.


Ariana hates 9/11 truthers. She wrote that.

Therefore she hates me. I emailed her a few times to tell her this.

Now I realize Huffington Post is a joke.

When is the last time we saw an issue that did not have titillating material?

huffy puffy

this arianna huffington is a joke ... does HuffPo considers itself progressive!? liberal!? open-minded!? informed!? relevant!?


HuffPo and Arianna should consider themselves owned.

This article is going viral....

This article is going viral. Tomorrow it will appear on many popular blogs. If Huffington Post didn't want this to be read, they made a big mistake.

Schlotsky Knows...

As predicted yesterday, the popular blogs have started to pick this up.

Showed up this morning on LRC:

Thousands of people will know about that story today from that single blog post. And that's just the first popular blog that picked it up.

And Another...

Huffington Post on 9/11.

Funny that the Huffington Post let Melissa Rossi write quite good stuff on 9/11 about a year ago.

Obama: Reopen the 9/11 Investigation -- Part 1

I would appear that there is no part 2 and ...

I would appear that there is no part 2 and that Melissa Rossi was no longer being posted as of 9 days later.

Looks like more evidence of The Huffington Post as fake progressive controlled media.

It would be interesting to hear what she has to say about why she is censoring 9/11 truth.

They also removed part 1

They also removed part 1 from her archive.

Arianna Huffington is either ...

Arianna Huffington is either a shill, a coward or not good a figuring stuff out. (perhaps a mixture of all)

Ironically she wrote a book titled "On Becoming Fearless"

Maybe Fearless is a goal for her.


She is a shill...

Watch her get smacked down by Glenn Greenwald while trying to shill...

Very revealing exchange

Whoa! She's even worse than I thought! You're right--Greenwald did a terrific job rebutting her. Thanks for posting.

Gatekeeper Exraordinaire...

Huffington is a former republican and she had just returned from Israel yapping the usual talking points.

Too bad that 911blogger does not allow a full dialogue about Israel's role in whatever they want a role in to play.

HuffPo is just another, if not the purest, example of alternative? media being nothing more than the corporate media dressed in different clothes. HuffPo is an OPENLY ADMITTED gatekeeper to the truth.

Each of the blogs mentioned here may be moving towards their own extinctions because the truth about whatever needs exposure, will contunue to be uncovered and exposed somewhere...including the truths about HuffPo and 911blogger being gatekeepers.

9/11 TRUTH for World PEACE and JUSTICE

Robin Hordon
Kingston, WA

Robin -

In the sense that moderating is a form of "gatekeeping", yes, we moderators are gatekeepers. Would you prefer anarchy and chaos on this site?

Moderating is not easy, we have to balance our vision for the site with everyone's desire for unlimited free speech and there is no escaping conflict when these meet.

That said, if anyone wants to post factual blogs showing the various connections between Israel, Israelis or Israeli companies to the events of 9/11, other false flags or other relevant events, that is always welcome. Blanket statements about Zionists and Zionism play into the hands of those who wish to frame 9/11 truth in a negative light and this will not be permitted on the site.

It is clear that individuals and organizations from several countries were involved in the 9/11 operation and that many of these are clearly not Israeli or Zionist, so it is rather unwise to exclude them from investigation and exposure, imo. We have to expose all the sociopaths who are destroying humanity or they will simply slip away to prey on us another day under a different guise.

We are approaching the tipping point and once we get enough of the American people convinced that the 9/11 operation was perpetrated by criminals other than "al Qaeda", they will not rest until the true perps are outed and dealt with and no PR firm or lobby will be able to shield them.

Let's not shoot ourselves in the foot as we approach the finish line, we still have at least one last, steep hill to climb.

Be well and keep up the great C.I. work!

An army of fools

The recent article at HuffPo on Iranian President Ahmedinejad's comments on 911 was addressed by many people. Comment after comment going on for many pages were filled with the same vitriolic and ignorant sentiments. It seems it IS ok to promote conspiracy theories on the Huffington Post, provided that they are the official government conspiracy theories.

It was depressing to realise just how many ignorant people read and comment at the Huffington Post, and I was unable to read all of them due to encroaching nausea. If the 911 perps were looking for people to fulfil the role of 'blog warriors for the OCT' then they need only obtain a list of regular commenters at the HuffPo. Of course none of these commenters espouses anything other than the OCT since if they did they would presumably be banned.

HuffPo is the proud home of 911 Official Conspiracy Theory supporter and Jersey Girl Kristin Breitweiser, but of course none of the other Jersey Girls can get a look in at the site, since they ask uncomfortable questions.

Huffington Hoax

There are only two types of people (or media outlets) who still say they believe the official story of 911. 1) those that haven't done even minimal research on the matters and 2) those who are part of the cover-up!

Huffington who?

Huffington who? Who? I don't read rags especially those that obviously have no credibility such as Huffpo.