Channel 9 Australia Does Hit Piece on 9/11 "Truthers"

Hello all,

Channel 9 in Sydney Australia (Australia Wide Broadcast) has done a piece for it's "Late Line" program regarding the Pentagon Shooter and the Treason in America Conference which aired on the 9th of March. It is a mixed bag and ultimately a inquisitive hit piece. On the whole it was better than nothing in my opinion.

Here's the video posted at You Tube;

Regards John

Nine News regurgitates ABC News propaganda

Exposed! Selective editing for dishonest purposes ... mainstream media promulgates government propaganda ...

Why do these talking heads babel such nonsense?

A few points to make regarding what these talking heads are saying. "Theories arose that he was a 9/11 Truther". Well, its more like, he had an Internet posting history attesting to is belief that 9/11 was an inside job. "9/11 Truthers flatly deny the shooter is one of them". We do? The man was crazy, not stupid. He believed 9/11 was an inside job - as to millions of people who don't try to storm the Pentagon with pistols. He had posted about 9/11, and wanted the truth to be out. He was, therefor, a 9/11 Truther. That doesn't mean what he did at the Pentagon was part of his 9/11 Truth effort. Nor does it mean that it was in any way appropriate. The man was mentally ill. His death was a tragic consequence of his disease.

Then we have Bury from ABC: "Its gospel, Loose Change". Congratulation Dylan, Korey and Jason! You have been given messiah status by ABC Night Line. No. Loose Change has been a fantastic tool for spreading the word, but everybody, even the creators recognize it as having flaws. Then Bury describes Bedell as a violent extremist. No, Bedell was a mentally ill man who died a tragic death.

"Their film peddles some largely discredited arguments. Claiming that jet fuel was not hot enough to melt the steel structures." Well, that's a pretty credible argument given the fact that it's true. "That the floors pancaked down in controlled explosions." The pancaked theory is the official myth. "Claiming that the hijacker of American Airlines flight 77 lacked sufficient training to fly the plane." Well, I claim that Hani Hanjur was not a hijacker of AA77, and he lacked the basic skills to control a Cessna 172.