SCHRIEVER AIR FORCE BASE Receives Twin Tower Beam for 9/11 Memorial

KKTV
Beam From WTC Arrives At Schriever For September 11 Memorial
Posted: 5:03 PM Apr 26, 2010
Source: http://www.kktv.com/news/headlines/92136719.html?storySection=story

It was a special welcoming ceremony Monday at Schriever Air Force Base for the arrival of a beam (C-28) from the fallen World Trade Center that will be used for a local 9-11 memorial.
Airmen and civilians could be seen lining the street, holding a salute as the large piece of metal was driven on to the base. The beam, which collapsed during the events of September 11, 2001, had been saved as part of the investigation until now.

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey donated the beam to Schriever. It will become part of a
future memorial on base to commemorate the events of Sept. 11, 2001.

SCHRIEVER AIR FORCE BASE, Colo. - Airmen salute a beam from one of the collapsed towers of the World Trade Center as it arrived to the base April 26. The beam, which the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey donated to Schriever, will become part of a future memorial on base to commemorate the events of Sept. 11, 2001. (U.S. Air Force photo/David Ahlschwede)

Put The Following UP

Someone should place a placard next to the steel that reads the following:

NORAD said after 9/11:

"It was like a doughnut. There was no coverage in the middle [of the United Sates]."

However, The 9/11 Commission Report said:

"...NEADS personnel spent the next minutes searching their RADAR SCOPES for the primary radar return [of American 11]."

"Controllers at NEADS LOCATED an unknown primary radar track [Flight 77], but "it kind of faded" over Washington."

"NEADS was never able to locate United 93 on RADAR BECAUSE it was already in the ground."

"NEADS NEVER lost track of Delta 1989..."

WHO'S TELLING THE TRUTH?

Dean Jackson/Editor-in-Chief DNotice.org
Washington, DC

John Q. Public will excuse

John Q. Public will excuse all manner of secrecy, lies, and omissions involving the military -- in the name of "national security". This topic falls into that category. 9/11 Truth is a PR campaign of the highest order. Only the strongest information will get new people awakened and involved. There are smoking guns everywhere but some are hotter than others. Let's stick to the most compelling and convincing evidence. Controlled demolition is the strongest evidence currently available to us all.

Convoluted Logic

JohnnyMo says,

"John Q. Public will excuse all manner of secrecy, lies, and omissions involving the military -- in the name of "national security". This topic falls into that category."

That makes no sense!

I could very well make an equally absurd statement, "John Q. Public will excuse all manner of secrecy, lies, and omissions involving the government -- in the name of "national security". This topic falls into that category."

By the way, the WHOLE 9/11 attacks were a "national security" operation, not just the military aspect of it!

Why would you think that controlled demolition was the best evidence? Where did The 9/11 Commission Report say controlled demolition took place on 9/11? It didn't. Now did The 9/11 Commission Report say NORAD DID monitor domestic aircraft over American airspace on 9/11, thereby blowing to pieces NORAD's and Popular Mechanics magazine's lies that NORAD didn't? Yes, it did! And you think controlled demolition is the best evidence? Unbelievable!

The whole 9/11 operation falls under the rubric of "national security", not just the military portion of it. The reason The 9/11 Commission Report had to tell the truth about NORAD is because there was already a history of literature on the Internet detailing NORAD's three missions before 9/11.

Your logic is convoluted, to say the least!

When the public sees that Popular Mechanics (PM) and NORAD conspired to lie about what NORAD monitored on 9/11 (thanks to the mainstream 9/11 Commission Report) then they're going to want to know what else were they lied to about. That questioning will then lead novices to controlled demolition in the non-mainstream literature.

First you hook the novice to 9/11 Truth with the mainstream material to build up trust, then you hit them with the so-called 9/11 conspiracy literature on demolition. As a matter of fact you won't have to hit them with 9/11 Truth literature. Novices to 9/11 Truth will come to it themselves out of curiosity.

The best strategy is to tell all novices to 9/11 Truth to read the PM magazine article on the 9/11 Truth Movement. Thanks to the verifiable lies PM told about NORAD, the novice will then simply assume the whole article is lies! The PM article is THE greatest tool for spreading 9/11 Truth! Sun Tzu would just love this strategy!

Also, don't forget to give the novice to 9/11 Truth other mainstream verifiable facts such as Operation Northwoods (http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/), and the audio file of FBI Special Agent John Anticev agreeing with his undercover operative Emad Salem (http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e88_1192741655 : fast forward to 3.00 minutes) that the 1993 WTC bomb was actually made by the FBI and handed over to the terrorists, allowing the terrorists to detonate the bomb instead of arresting the terrorists in the act of planting the bomb.

These verifiable facts from mainstream sources will create in the novice's mind a Positive Psychological Mindset towards 9/11 Truth, because the initial contact information can't be argued with; it's mainstream information, not "conspiracy" literature.

Dean Jackson/Editor-in-Chief DNotice.org
Washington, DC

Don't be suprised if...

...the HI PERPS control the deployment of WTC steel monuments exclusively onto MILITARY SITES in the years to follow...

Please remember that we have exposed [and in my earlier comments have CELEBRATED] the fact that every memorial erected remembering the attacks on 9/11/2001 will provide the 9/11 Truth Movement with YET ANOTHER LOCATION and OPPORTUNITY at which we can spread THE TRUTH behind the 9/11 attacks.

...at which we can "eternally" CHALLENGE the HI PERPS' position supporting the OCT...

And opposite to the trials in NYC for KSM [which would also provide the 9/11TM with an amazing oppotunity to SPREAD OUR TRUTH to the average citizen], this shift into Military "Legal Ops" at Military Tribunals would provide an opportunity to diminish the 9/11TM...

...and as we all know, the MSM are completely bought and paid for by the HI PERPS...

...so THEY will not cover it no matter where its held ...

...and its for sure that this move is designed to "psy-op" the public into thinking that its OK to have the civil trials in a military setting...

Its really as simple as that...

IE: Get the trials about Military misconduct located at Military bases and subject to Military adjucation and Military press coverage...

Anything troubling here?

DUHHHH!!!

Wouldn't you do the same if yiu had the WORLD'S BIGGEST LIE to cover up?

And thye "authority" to do it?

Of course you would...and so are they!

Keep the grip...

9/11 Truth for World Peace and Justice

love, peace and progress...

Robin Hordon
Kingston, WA

Wow, That's One BIZARRE Photo

But then, one of the main reasons 9/11 happened was to give the military something to use to motivate their soldiers. You always see pictures of stern looking birds (Bald Eagle) and stuff like that.

WHAT INVESTIGATION?

"The beam, which collapsed during the events of September 11, 2001, had been saved as part of the investigation until now."

Do they mean the investigation that didn't look for controlled demolition?

Do they mean the one that said an "unprecedented thermal exapnsion" caused WTC7 to collapse?

Do they mean the one that said the floor trusses sagged, pushed the exterior columns out, OOOPS, change that, pulled them in, OOOPS, change that, unzipped them all along one whole floor?

Do they mean the one that could not get the floor assemblies to fail in the fire tests, but simply modeled it with a computer to fit their pre-conceived hypothesis?