Hillary Clinton: Some Pakistani officials know where Bin Laden is


Some Pak officials know where Osama Bin Laden is: Hillary Clinton
Monday, May 10, 2010 13:48

After some tough talk on Pakistan, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says some people in its government are aware of the whereabouts of elusive Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and Afghan Taliban chief Mullah Omar.

The Obama Administration meanwhile for the first time accused Taliban of being behind the botched Times Square bombing plot.

"Some Pakistani officials were more informed about Al-Qaeda and Taliban than they let on", Clinton told CBS in an interview.

"I'm not saying that they're at the highest levels but I believe that somewhere in this government are people who know where Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda is, where Mullah Omar and the leadership of the Afghan Taliban is and we expect more cooperation to help us bring to justice, capture or kill,
those who attacked us on 9/11," she said.

Clinton had over the week-end warned Pakistan that it will face "very severe consequences" if any terror plot like the failed Times Square bombing was traced to that country.

"We've made it very clear that if, heaven-forbid, an attack like this that we can trace back to Pakistan were to have been successful, there would be very severe
consequences," she had said.

Asked if US was not getting sufficient cooperation from Islamabad in anti-terror drive, the US' top diplomat acknowledged there was a "sea change" in cooperation by Pakistani authorities, but added "we want more".

When asked why Obama Administration was not piling up pressure on Islamabad to give up Osama bin Laden and his deputy Ayman al Zawahiri, Clinton replied "I have to stand up for the efforts the Pakistani government is taking. They have done a very significant move toward going after the terrorists within their own country".

Her comments came even as other senior US officials including Attorney General Eric Holder said they have obtained new evidence that Pakistani Taliban was behind the attempt to trigger a car bomb blast in the heart of New York.

"We know they facilitated the bomb plot and they probably also financed it", the Attorney General told ABC News.

Faisal Shahzad, a 30-year-old naturalised American citizen of Pakistani origin was arrested last Monday for rigging a SUV vehicle to explode in the Times Square.

As the new revelations raised fresh questions about US relationship with Pakistan, Washington has responded by stepping up pressure on Pakistan to crack down on radical Islamic militants safe havens in tribal belt bordering Afghanistan.

New York Times said US military commander in Afghanistan Gen Stanley A McChrystal met Pakistani military chief Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani in Islamabad yesterday and pressed for a new military offensive in North Waziristan, the main base of the Pakistan Taliban.

Let's demonize Muslims some more....

What is the point of posting this Government sponsored propaganda that demonizes Muslims and continues to blame the attacks on 9/11/2001 on Usama Bin Laden and evil Muslims?

Does anyone here believe that 'Al Qaeda' and "Islamic Extremism" was responsible for the attacks on 9/11/2001?

I see this sort of stuff on 911blogger.com all the time and no one really confronts it. It's almost as if people here might actually believe the myth that Bin laden and Evil Muslims brought down those towers. Now that would be scary.

Get mad at Hillary not 911blogger

This story is defiinitely 9/11 related and it is relevant here because it reveals the governent's Increasingly desperate propoganda tactics. I do not think we would be hearing so much from high ranking US officials and MSM about OBL "sightings" if they didn't think the myth needed some fresh embalming fluid. They are concerned, as well they should be, that they can do nothing to stop the growth of this movement. OBL is still Boogyman #1 so when you see them trotting him out onto the field, it means the game is on the line.


The fact that Hillary Clinton made this announcement means it is indeed a 9/11 related story, and 911blogger is a site for covering 9/11 related news.

Very few if any people here believe the official myth that "evil Muslims" were responsible. Those who do are by far in the minority.

Virtually everybody here accepts the CD of the towers and I don't think anyone buys into the idea that al Qaeda planted the explosives.

We in the movement are, among other things, watchers out for propaganda from the official side, and when we see this propaganda being put out, we highlight it and expose it.

Chriskin is absolutely right; the fact that Hilary is doing this means that the perps feel the official myth needs some lubrication and reinforcement.

That, my friends, means we are winning.


when can we stop "winning" and declare victory?
when will this be common knowledge? When will everyone know about building ?

Bread & butter

Hilary (and indeed most of the Democratic Party and Congress) know where their bread is buttered, and who is paying the piper and caliing the tune... "The investment by statement by 75% of the Senate and vast quantities of Congress-cretins yields an arrangement for endless war, war dividends, and the wholesale massacre of Muslims, sleeping pregnant women, their babies, and their teens, along with the assassinations by fiat that are multiplying on the Zee Big New Chessboard of the world. Someone should count how many people in high military, political and power positions have dual citizenships or whose political and economic futures are tightly woven with conflicts of interest. It has become necessary to be a crook and to insure the undying (or in the case of the military, dying) fealty to Israeli/Zionist interests.The American/Israeli braid or brand has become a global “snuff film” production company."

We have now "developed" evidence

Every word that comes out of Hillary's mouth is a considered lie. To perpetuate the "monstrous myth" they have created, perhaps they will kill one of their Bin Laden look-a-likes and tell us all that they got him. Even the boogie man must be approaching his use-by date.

This has got inside job written all over it in big red letters, brought to you through the ISI and the fake terror dept of the CIA. It seems likely they are constantly on the lookout for willing fools they can frame or turn into patsies.

When Holder came out with this, his actual words were, “We’ve now developed evidence that shows that the Pakistani Taliban was behind the attack.” http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/05/holder-pakistani-taliban... How do you "develop" evidence? You don't develop evidence, you FIND evidence. The only circumstance in which you would develop evidence is when you're framing someone. By his choice of words, Holder has admitted this to be a false flag job.

the myth needed

"fresh embalming fluid" nice, very nice. To my knowledge, the number of people who frequent this site that believe the 19 muslims w/boxcutters, directed from a cave crap is exactly zero.

To be fair to jpass

While I think he overreacted to the posting of this entry, and while I think "virtually" all the regular users of this site don't believe the "carried out entirely by Arab hijackers" myth, there have been a few instances, over the past year, where certain individuals have tried to vigorously defend various aspects of the official story. Not the entire official story, but various aspects thereof. And many of these various aspects are the aspects which most centrally revolve around the alleged Muslim hijackers.

In particular, there was a concerted effort to disprove DRG's research into the alleged phone calls from the airplanes, particularly Barbara Olson's call from Flight 77 which allegedly hit the Pentagon. It's an impressive blog entry lengthwise, and to those skimmers judging the book by the cover, Griffin might appear to have been successfully rebutted. To that I say: Don't forget that Vincent Bugliosi wrote a 1,600 page book "proving" Oswald was a lone nut with no government assistance! Oh, and in 10,000 pages, NIST MUST have covered the collapses as thoroughly as possible right? But like the NIST report, the aforementioned blog entry by jimd3100 about the phone calls didn't hold up under scrutiny, as seen in DRG's rebuttal.

Now, if a person is going to defend the claim that the phone calls were "genuine," that implies that the passenger was indeed calling from a plane that was actually hijacked by brown-skinned men wielding boxcutters - and indeed, Olson's call is the only one which mentions boxcutters, and was incidentally the phone call that was the most heavily defended as being "genuine."

Furthermore, some of the same people who defend the phone calls (particularly Olson's) as being authentic calls from hijacked planes (despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary) also defend the claim that the said plane, AA77, impacted the Pentagon from the official South of Citgo flight path (despite definitive evidence to the contrary, i.e. numerous on-location interviews with witnesses who say things such as "Bet my life on it" that the plane approached from the North of Citgo).

In short, they are defending the claim that Hani Hanjour and the other hijackers hijacked the plane, and Barbara Olson actually called Ted and told him about the said hijackers, and shortly afterwords, the plane approached the Pentagon low and level from South of the Citgo, knocked down the light poles (one of which allegedly speared Lloyde England's cab without leaving a scratch on the hood) and then crashed into the building causing the directional damage and the hole in the C ring.

So there are a small number of people who, while on the one hand certainly claim to want to know the whole truth and agreeing that "we don't know" what happened and therefore demand an investigation, on the other hand seem quite adamant on defending some of the central aspects of the official story with regard to hijackers hijacking planes and crashing them into buildings.

But I agree that on the whole, the extreme majority of people on here are more skeptical of EACH aspect of the official story.

ESPECIALLY in light of what we now know about things like Operation Northwoods, which went as far as to suggest "fake passengers" with "carefully prepared aliases."

It's not logical to say, "Oh, I accept Controlled Demolition, but the other material aspects of the official story are true." That's not how it works with me. As we know 9/11 to be one big psyop military deception, I assume each aspect of the official story to be false until proven true, not the other way round.

Props to Joe below for posting Fabled Enemies.

ETA: Also, why is this entry on the front page while the one about the former Controlled Demo Inc employee is only in the blogs? Maybe it's anomalies like this that contribute to jpass' suspicion.


"Oh, I accept Controlled Demolition, but the other material aspects of the official story are true."

Hey Adam thanks for setting me straight.

The position above is not logical, you're right. I think what irks me is that the controlled demolition has been proven. With that we have people like Sibel Edmonds and Colleen Rowley who seem to support the Al Qaeda myth by not addressing this fact. It's the mix-mash of "Al Qaeda is real and did it" with "we know it was a controlled demolition" that concerns me because, like you said, it's not logical.

Best evidence

This cheeses me off too. Controlled demolition is our best evidence by a mile, that the official story is bogus. Yet we constantly have to defend this valuable evidence from those who seem to prefer circumstantial stuff or things that are arguable, defensible, require tedious and lengthy explanations or which offer some sort of plausible deniability to the culpable. This is not to downgrade the importance of other evidence, but to single out CD as definitely the best.

And then there are those who seem to live in a world where this evidence can simply be ignored. Many, many people will condemn Bush/Cheney, but mention controlled demolition and they just can't face it. I guess denial is a complex phenomenon, with people open to various levels of information depending upon their emotional investment in different aspects of the myth.

Having said all that, it doesn't do us any good to express frustration or impatience with such people. However, our approach on this may have been too soft. We may have allowed some of these people to gain a profile in the movement which is unwarranted. The controlled demolition evidence is too important to allow those who would deny it a "free pass". I see no harm in probing to endeavour to understand the reasons for such denials. After all, it could mean something is being hidden which really ought to be out in the open.


for those who haven't seen it.

hillarys dream

She had a dream. Osama came to her and said "I did 911 and indeed at this propitious for your needs moment i am in Pakistan" which firmed Hillarys resolve on the matter. Later in the same dream Osama said that he and he alone had guided the bomb makers hand to times square and that he required predator drone bombings on the innocent children of Pakistan to bring about freedom and love to the peoples....oops............that was another dream........
Hillary asked Osama why he was telling her all this, but by then the ghost had parted. Gone into the festering video workshops of propaganda land to have his nose lengthened, leaving the rest of the global initiative to be made up with Eric who was also in the dream, just recently returned from banana land where he had defended the Indian peoples against the giant chiciquita banana monster, fighting for the poor drudged farmers rights

The real Bin Laden please stand up if you are not already dead !

Herblay France

bonjour ,
it is about time we confront people Hillary Clinton directly via WeAreChange or other YouTube diffusers to ask her which Bin Laden is in Pakistan.

Since 2001 we have seen so many different Bin Ladens confessing their cime of 911 and it is all so confusing. The real Bin Laden is more than likely dead in December 2001. Has she readDavid Ray Griffins book ?
Does she know how stupid she looks in saying such a thing to a growing world of people realising that 911 was an inside job.

Of course perhaps tomorrow Hilary will say he escaped to Iran and that America has to attack Iran to prevent Bin Laden getting his hand on Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's nuclear bomb. Such lies worked to lie American soldiers to death in Iraq. The Americans have not learnt their History on that subject so why shouldn't such lies work to wage war against Iran.

As I have said before, with Bin Laden dead and buried, no one can disapprouve that he is in Pakistan ou Iran. Certainly not Bin Laden.

When is the world going to wake up and change our laws so that the ciminels gouverning us are bought to justice and prevented in the future arriving at such posts ?




It would be necessary to ask to Hillary Clinton why the «National Security Agency (NSA)», the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) are unable, after almost nine years of research of the alleged murderer of approximately 3,000 people in the U.S., to locate the place where is Osama bin Laden (a man of which the face is known of entire planet) if he is still alive.

Meainwhile...back at the Ranch

in Wyoming, Richard Cheney abides.. why not go after him, if only for War Crimes..? Eh Hillary?


"I'm not saying that they're at the highest levels but I believe that somewhere in this government are people who know where Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda is, where Mullah Omar and the leadership of the Afghan Taliban is and we expect more cooperation to help us bring to justice, capture or kill,
those who attacked us on 9/11," she said.