Posner Plagiarizes Again By Tim Elfrink
Gerald Posner, shill for the criminal state (Case Closed, Why America Slept), has had other unethical behavior exposed; apparently, he's a serial plagiarist. Also see the articles linked from the source page, under "Related Content."- loose nuke
www.miaminewtimes.com/2010-05-20/news/posner-plagiarizes-again/
Disgraced Miami Beach author Gerald Posner is desperate. He apparently whitewashed an account of his serial plagiarism on his Wikipedia page, then threatened Miami New Times with a lawsuit for writing about it. And now he's retained an 83-year-old lawyer infamous for publicizing the "grassy knoll" theory of John F. Kennedy's assassination, a conspiracy Posner refuted in his most famous book.
To review: Posner, who has penned 11 books including a Pulitzer finalist, resigned as investigative writer for the Daily Beast website this past February. He acknowledged lifting copy. The Miami Beach author and former Wall Street attorney also admitted stealing scores of passages for his most recent book, Miami Babylon.
Now a new review of Posner's work shows much more. A 48-year-old Wisconsin doctoral student named Greg Gelembiuk has discovered Posner lifted 35 passages in two books: his 2003 take on the 9-11 attacks, Why America Slept, and Secrets of the Kingdom, a 2005 tome about Saudi Arabia.
Miami New Times provided Poynter Institute senior scholar Roy Peter Clark with three lengthy passages Posner apparently lifted in the 9-11 book. "This constitutes plagiarism by any definition I can think of," he says. "The capturing of someone else's material that is this extensive cannot, in my opinion, have been done accidentally."
The evidence (posted in full on miaminewtimes.com) contradicts Posner's rationale for his crimes in Miami Babylon. This past March 16, he told New Times he'd used a new system of "trailing endnotes" in Babylon, which he claimed had led to attribution problems. He said he hadn't used that system in past books.
Posner's lawyer, Mark Lane, is best known for writing Rush to Judgment, the mother of all JFK-conspiracy books. He declined to answer specific questions about the plagiarism, but cited unnamed "vulgar and threatening attacks" by the paper on Posner. He claimed the newspaper "interfered" with Posner's relationship with his publishers, Random House, by providing them with the latest evidence.
For its part, Random House responded to this paper's inquiry — which simply listed the apparent plagiarism — thusly: "A charge of plagiarism directed against any of our books is taken seriously... and we will closely examine the material alleging this in these two works."
The potential consequences? Unclear. Many news writers — including those employed by this paper — are warned at hire that any plagiarism is a firing offense. But life is different in the nonfiction book world.
Doris Kearns Goodwin, the best-selling historian, was famously caught plagiarizing in her 1987 book The Fitzgeralds and The Kennedys. In 2002, after a story appeared in the Weekly Standard, she admitted lifting wholesale from Lynne McTaggart's biography of Kathleen Kennedy. Her publisher, Simon & Schuster, even paid McTaggart a settlement to keep quiet. Eventually copies were recalled. Quotes and sources were added.
That same year, the Weekly Standard nailed fellow historian Stephen Ambrose for plagiarism in his best seller, The Wild Blue. Ambrose had cited sources, but failed to use quote marks around some borrowed prose. Simon & Schuster later issued a formal apology.
Here's how the 2003 edition of the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers — the standard source for academic rules — puts it: "Presenting an author's exact wording without marking it as a quotation is plagiarism, even if you cite the source."
Gelembiuk's review of Posner's work, reviewed by Miami New Times, found the author committed several brands of plagiarism. Among the findings:
In Why America Slept, he lifted three passages totaling 927 words without crediting the book The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics of Terror, written in 1998 by David Hoffman.
Eleven other sources were apparently pilfered without citation.
Twelve sources are properly cited in the end notes, but the author copied exact wording — in passages as long as 134 words — without quote marks or any other clear demarcation.
Representatives of Simon & Schuster, which published Miami Babylon last year, have not responded to multiple emails and phone calls, so it's a mystery whether they plan to address the acknowledged problems in that book. Their reticence might have something to do with sales — Babylon has moved only 5,000 copies, according to numbers provided by the Nielson Company.
That's a stark contrast to Why America Slept, which so far has sold 63,000 copies, and Secrets of the Kingdom, with 19,000 books purchased. Substantial money is involved. Assuming, with some rough math, that each sold about half hard-cover and half paperback at average prices, Why America Slept would have garnered about $1.3 million and Secrets just under a half million bucks.
"Unfortunately, in book publishing, the decision on whether to address plagiarism often comes down to the question of... how much a solution will cost," says Lee Wilkins, a professor at the University of Missouri School of Journalism who studies media ethics.
So how credible is the evidence? Gelembiuk, a doctoral student in zoology at the University of Wisconsin, is a proven quantity. He became interested in Posner's case after Slate's Jack Shafer first publicized plagiarism problems this past February 5. Posner resigned five days later, apologized, and blamed the "warp speed of the Internet" for corrupting his reporting.
Gelembiuk, who uses plagiarism software in classes he teaches, wasn't satisfied with the apology. So he ran Miami Babylon through Viper, free online software that scours the Internet to look for copied phrases. It turned up 16 new instances of stolen prose. New Times and author Frank Owen — whose book, Clubland, Posner had heavily plagiarized — found more problems.
Posner's claim about "degrees of plagiarism" struck Gelembiuk as insincere. One key reason: after the New Times' story was published, the grad student caught Posner apparently trying to edit the section about his crimes on his own Wikipedia page.
On April 11, "miamiskull" — the same name Posner uses on his personal YouTube page — deleted a paragraph about evidence that he'd altered or misattributed quotes in Babylon. (Evidence is posted atmiaminewtimes.com.)
Gelembiuk alerted Wikipedia and the revisions were undone. But a week later, "miamiskull" again scrubbed the page. Neither Posner nor Lane responded to New Times' questions about the Wikipedia edit.
So Gelembiuk bought ebook copies of Why America Slept and Secrets of the Kingdom and ran them through Viper, which turned up the 19 suspect passages in the 9-11 book and 16 in the Saudi Arabia book.
Most egregious seem to be Posner's theft from Hoffman's book about Timothy McVeigh's bombing. Check out these excerpts:
Hoffman: All resolved to use whatever force was necessary to oust all foreign forces stationed on Islamic holy land. One Arab observer with direct knowledge of the conference said the participants' resolution was "a virtual declaration of relentless war" on the U.S.-led West.
Why America Slept, page 111: All resolved to use whatever force was necessary to oust all foreign forces stationed on Islamic holy land. One Arab observer with direct knowledge of the conference said the participants' resolution was "a virtual declaration of relentless war" on the U.S.-led West.
Many other passages are simple paragraphs taken from news stories that Posner borrows without citing the source in end notes. For example:
The Progressive, August 1995: In the statue's shadow stood three turbaned, bearded men smiling and waving, as one held a bomb and the others burned an American flag. The cartoonist modified Emma Lazarus's famous poem to read: "Give us your tired, your poor, your huddled masses, your terrorists, your slime, your evil cowards, your religious fanatics..."
Why America Slept, page 92: In the statue's shadow stood three turbaned, bearded men smiling and waving as one held a bomb and the others burned an American flag. The cartoonist had modified Emma Lazarus's poem to read: "Give us your tired, your poor, your huddled masses, your terrorists, your slime, your evil cowards, your religious fanatics..."
Or consider the following:
New York Times, October 21 2001: And while the nation was having a good laugh at the expense of Florida's hanging chads and butterfly ballots, Mohamed Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi were there, in Florida, learning to drive commercial jetliners.
Why America Slept, page 149: And while the country enjoyed a good laugh at the expense of Florida's butterfly ballots and hanging chads, Mohamed Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi remained in Florida learning to fly jetliners.
In his May 12 letter to New Times, Lane doesn't dispute the findings. The elderly lawyer and author — whose colorful history also includes representing Jim Jones' People's Temple and then barely surviving the community's massacre in Guyana — declined to talk about whether Posner had plagiarized. "I'm not your witness in this case. The question is improper," he scoffed.
- loose nuke's blog
- Login to post comments
Secret Service Murderers
Miami New Times says,
"Disgraced Miami Beach author Gerald Posner is desperate. He apparently whitewashed an account of his serial plagiarism on his Wikipedia page, then threatened Miami New Times with a lawsuit for writing about it. And now he's retained an 83-year-old lawyer infamous for publicizing the "grassy knoll" theory of John F. Kennedy's assassination, a conspiracy Posner refuted in his most famous book."1
Response:
"Posner refuted [Mark Lane] in his most famous book."2
When was that? From the photographic evidence alone, Mark Lane is correct. The Secret Service agents in the chase car following JFK's limousine are staring right at JFK as the president struggles with his neck after being shot (click the picture to enlarge):
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/images/Altgens.jpg
Notice the three agents wearing glasses (two seated up front and one on a foot platform) looking directly at JFK as the president struggles. The other three agents standing on the foot platforms are playing dumb by looking around them, forgetting that their attention is supposed to be on the President. Only when Jackie Kennedy climbs out onto the back of the limousine to retrieve a piece of JFK's head does the Secret Service agent assigned to her (SSA Clint Hill) leap off the Secret Service chase car to get Jackie back into the limousine.
------------------------------------------
1. http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2010-05-20/news/posner-plagiarizes-again/
2. Ibid
------------------------------------------
Dean Jackson/Editor-in-Chief DNotice.org
Washington, DC
In the Altgens photo
there appear other anomalies:
The gaze of two of the agents appears to be at the entrance to the Book Depository Building and the person of either LHO or co-worker Billy Lovelady and not six floors up at the supposed origin of the shot just fired. The agents looking toward Kennedy could have been looking toward the "grassy knoll," possible source of the shot, which apparently hit Kennedy in the front of the neck.
The other agents appear disoriented and slow to react, perhaps from the night before when they were plied with drink at a Fort Worth after-hours club by several newspaper reporters, including Bob Schieffer (as noted in WC Report and Schieffer's autobiography).
The back of the Kennedy car has no Secret Service personnel aboard, as would usually be the case:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY02Qkuc_f8
Feds in Shades
andhowe,
the SSA in glasses are definitely looking at JFK (the SSA in glasses on the foot platform is looking downwards at JFK. The SSA seated in the front passenger seat is looking straight ahead at JFK, not the Grassy Knoll area. The SSA behind the wheel is staring just a tad askew to his right, not far enough askew to be looking at the Grassy Knoll.).
The SSA standing on the foot platform behind the SSA on the foot platform wearing shades is, however, looking over towards the Grassy Knoll.
If the SSA on the foot platforms were that plastered, they would never have been able to remain on the narrow foot platforms, and when the SSA sped off to Parkland Hospital, I don't recall hearing about SSA falling off the foot platforms!
Note that SSA Clint Hill jumps off his foot platform, runs up to JFK's limousine and jumps onto the back of the President's limousine to assist Jackie back into her seat. As he assists Jackie, the limousine speeds up, but SSA Hill is as nimble as one would expect a Secret Service agent to be and doesn't show any signs of being plastered. Fast forward to 4:10 minutes in the YouTube video below to witness SSA Clint Hill's acrobatic performance:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8M9GAUUSss
Also, don't forget that the Altgen photo (http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/images/Altgens.jpg) was taken AFTER the SECOND SHOT had been fired according to the official narrative, so even if the SSA were plastered they still should be off the foot platforms, running for JFK's limousine.
Note that LBJ's SSA are reacting to the shots heard. One of LBJ's agents has the door already open in the chase car behind the Vice President's limousine.
The SSA agents playing dumb by looking around them are in violation of Standard Operating Procedure; they're supposed to be running towards the President's car (as is the other SSA agent on the foot platform wearing the shades).
As far as Bob Schieffer goes, he should be receiving his Operation Mockingbird retirement benefits by now! Remember, Dallas is where Dan Rather sold his soul to get where he got to at CBS. By the Monday after the assassination he had seen the Zapruder film, and on national television that Monday he forgot to tell the American public how JFK's head was pushed back and to the left when the fatal gun shot hit him.
Dean Jackson/Editor-in-Chief DNotice.org
Washington, DC
Good points,
but I recall from the Zapruder film that, due to the position of cars at the time of the shot, the "grassy knoll" would have been visible from the SS car generally as behind and above JFK's car. The important thing is that none of the agents looked up at the officially supposed origin of the gunfire. Looking right at Kennedy immediately afterward would have been natural and easy due to the relative positions. The Altgens photo shows JFK hands going to his throat, a sign he had just been hit by the first shot. The JFK agents would have been hungover but not necessarily drunk at that time. LBJ's guards not so, thus a factor in the difference in their reactions. The important thing about the drinking is that it was against SS regulations but done ahead of what everybody at the time knew was a dangerous undertaking by the president -- and promoted by employees of a newspaper known to be very close to LBJ. And there were no repercussions -- that sound familiar?
The Altgen Photo is Conclusive
andhowe,
The fact that three of the four SSA on the foot platforms are ALREADY reacting by looking around them, or towards the Grassy Knoll in the case of one SSA, is proof of a stand down. Each one of them knows that his first reaction is to run towards the President's limousine. They remain on the foot platforms even after JFK is shot in the head! And those three SSA were JFK's assigned agents! SSA Clint Hill, who was Jackies' assigned body guard, was the only one who jumped off his foot platform and made it to JFK's limousine. And let's not forget the SSA in the passenger seat of JFK's limousine who might as well have been asleep.
Dean Jackson/Editor-in-Chief DNotice.org
Washington, DC
Mark Lane- reliable?
In addition to the red flag of Mark Lane acting as Posner's attorney, see these links concerning Lane's JFK research:
http://www.truthmove.org/forum/topic/1799?replies=7#post-9755
Mark Lane was INSCOM
loose nuke,
interesting. Ever since coming to terms with what really happened on 9/11 in late 2002, I always suspected Jonestown as being an intelligence community operation.
Bob Woodward was Naval Intelligence, and in the real world he would never have been allowed to stay on the Watergate story due to his inexperience.
Dean Jackson/Editor-in-Chief DNotice.org
Washington, DC
JFK
The most important point on the JFK issue is that Mark Lane wrote an excellent book on the JFK assassination and Posner wrote a miserable book. In no sense did Posner refute Lane's claims, and especially he did not overcome the Grassy Knoll evidence, which remains solid to this day.
Is the Grassy Knoll a diversion?
Did Mark Lane ever investigate the assassination from the perspective of ELF Leader, the Dealy Lama?
Most puzzling?
The most puzzling aspect about this story is how
is Mark Lane (genuine JFK assination truther) defending
this peace of Shit.......
peace,pw