Good interview

I hope that he is elected. I know several people in Utah and they are all Constitutionally minded patriots.
It's refreshing to hear honesty from a politician.

I think we would be suprised how many congressional reps have similar views...

Thanks for a little more light in a dark world!

Kind regards John

Did Merrill Cook KNOW he was being recorded? It's hard to be certain from the camera angle. Or did he speak candidly only because he thought there would be no record? It's significant in either scenario, but an order of magnitude (or two) more so if he actually intended for his comments to be part of the official record as they now are. If politicians actually running for office start staking out positions on WTC7 and FAA irregularities on 9/11 as refreshingly sane (for a politician) as those expressed by Senate candidate Cook, things could get very interested indeed. And if I learn that Merrill Cook intentionally said these things on video record, then a campaign contribution will be coming his way from me very soon. In fact, I'll send him money every time he repeats these statements.

did not "collapse" but were blown up, from the top down and that observation is irrefutable in accordance with Sir Isaac Newton's Three Laws of Motion, but we can let that slide, I guess, or can we? After all, didn't the most people die when those buildings were destroyed..?

I think the official story hangs on that really, on that focal point at ground zero, namely, that the buildings collapsed as a direct and sole result of the plane strikes and fires - if that goes down under rational analysis and scientific scrutiny, down goes the whole official story. Therefore, it's noteworthy imo, that he does not want to challenge that assumption and NIST's so-called investigation of the twin tower's destruction - can't go THERE now can we..?

Hopefully future generations, the non experiencing generations, will take another look and conclude well beyond any reasonable doubt, that the twin towers were blown up and did not "collapse" at all. I'm sure they will and can't not - while the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center remain forever conspicuously absent the New York City Slyline, in perpetuity. They will know, and it can be proven with little more than a few youtube videos, a stopwatch, and come basic physics. It's self evident in fact, a mere thought experiment can prove it ie: the timed descent of a steel safe or a grand piano dropped in nothing but air from the same height.

The presence of molten metal in the pit of destruction also proves the presence of explosives.

It's a no brainer - the twin towers were destroyed not by the plane impacts and fire, but by explosives, which implies by logical extension that the planes themselves were not the originating planes hijacked and flown to and into the targets by hijackers, although that need not be proven to show that the official story is flat out false regarding the cause of the destruction of the twin towers on September 11th, 2001, a day which must not be forgotten, for the sake of all the many victims of 9/11, both on that infamous day, and in the wake of the event, which served as a catalyzing and catastrophic "Pearl Harbor event" as envisioned by Philip Zelikow of all people, prior TO 9/11.