Jon Gold's Official 9/11 Justice Start Up Kit
via Facebook:
Here is the 9/11 Report. I suggest you read it, and ask others to read it to understand the "official account."
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/index.html
After that, I suggest you ask people to watch "9/11: Press For Truth"...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3979568779414136481#
Then I suggest you ask people to watch the companion DVD "In Their Own Words: The Untold Stories Of The 9/11 Families"...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4399917864007973679#
Then I suggest you recommend the "Complete 9/11 Timeline" to get people started...
http://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=911_project
Then I suggest you recommend this series of movies I made called "What's Being Covered Up?"...
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20080326132655798
Then I suggest you recommend the report on the inadequacies of the 9/11 Commission's Report compiled by 9/11 Family Members Lorie Van Auken and Mindy Kleinberg...
http://911truth.org/downloads/Family_Steering_Cmte_review_of_Report.pdf
Then I suggest you show people this list of unanswered questions compiled by the 9/11 Family Steering Committee...
http://www.911independentcommission.org/questions.html
Then I suggest you ask people to read the different letters sent out over the years by the September Eleventh Advocates...
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20090720125107330
Here is an archive I made a few years ago called the "Who Is? Archives"...
http://visibility911.com/jongold/?p=157
Then, if all of that fails to motivate people to fight for justice, you can show them my article, "The Facts Speak For Themselves"...
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20090104025547844
Good luck!
- zombie bill hicks's blog
- Login to post comments
Thanks for posting this...
ZBH. It saddens me that things like "9/11: Press For Truth," the report compiled by Lorie Van Auken and Mindy Kleinberg, the September Eleventh Advocates' Letters, the "Complete 9/11 Timeline," some of the most valuable 9/11 information on this planet, aren't permanently on the left hand side of this site, and instead I see 12 posts having to do with Controlled Demolition. It's a perfect representation to me as to why more people don't take us seriously anymore. There isn't even mention of the fact that Elena Kagan, a participant in the 9/11 Cover-Up, was just made our latest Supreme Court Justice, or the fact that the James Zadroga 9/11 Health & Compensation Act is being voted on in the House next week. Fucking sad.
Jon
The Complete 9/11 Timeline is linked in the "9/11 Inquiry Sites" section on the left, albeit under the old name of CooperativeResearch, and Press for Truth is easily found at 911docs.net under the "9/11 Related Sites" section. As for the Advocates' Letters and Elena Kagan, while they aren't mentioned in the sidebar, there are articles on both here, The fact that the buildings were taken down with explosives hits far closer to the truth of 9/11 than either though, which is why the demolition of the buildings gets so much attention in the sidebar.
pretty sweet resources
Dont you think, Pav?
Great stuff for newbies to get on board with. It'll definitely go a long way toward helping newcomers to get a good footing on what it means to be a 9/11 truth activist without any silly dis/mis-info getting in the way.
As Jon and I have had our disagreements on the compelling hypothesis that is CD, we both agree that it's done a lot to actually make people resent whenever 9/11 truth is mentioned. But as I've said before, there is no One Right Way to be an activist; use the tools that work for you to open the minds of people willing to listen.
Id rather not see this thread get mired in what someone thinks someone else should be doing or saying, so lets just leave it at that. Take care!
It seems you misunderstood my previous comment
I didn't suggest anyone should be doing or saying anything, but rather simply explained why many of us do and say what Jon argued we shouldn't. Also, calling the demolition of the WTC buildings a "compelling hypothesis" is akin to referring to biological evolution as such, and of course people who've vested their faith in stories to the contrary resent being told they're wrong, but I contend that's a lame excuse to shy away from the truth. In fact, I contend there's no legitimate excuse for shying away from the truth, in regard to 9/11 or otherwise.
As for Jon's list, it starts out with the hundreds of pages of dis/mis-info and fluff which is the 9/11 Commission Report obstructing the way to the truth. Beyond that, while I appreciate the rest of the information he compiled in his list, I could forgive a newbie for wading through it all only to come out with the misguided notion that the official story, while the leaving many loose ends, presents an overall narrative which is generally correct. So, I'll continue recommending newcomers to 911review.com instead, as that website provides the most accessible yet thorough debunking of the official conspiracy theory that I've come across.
Good List
It's a great set of steps, Jon. I wish everyone in the movement was as responsible as you.