Here we are conflicting with a very, very intelligent person, who has been brave and honest, it seems, all these years about foreign policy and schemes of the elites.
So, are we right, or is he? It could be a good question, especially if the 9/11 truth movement was made up of people with strong agendas or anger or generally go from one conspiracy theory to another.

But those I have met, and many in leadership in 9/11, are very modest, careful, astute, logical types of people, many of whom have never been activists before.
They are, many of them, accomplished professionals and people who have great respect from others, a lot of them having been in careers and occupations related to the information of 9/11.

We could name the hundreds and hundreds of people who have studied the official story of 9/11 and are convinced it is a lie.

But better yet, go to the science. It is irrefutable. This is particularly true in studying the collapses at the WTC. There simply is no argument.

And so, we must, MUST, conclude that Noam is either ignorant, or lying. And ignorant just doesn't fit, particularly since he has spent his life being skeptical of government stories.
Much more likely is that he is lying.
And he is lying for what reason?
He is lying, possibly, to coverup the lies because he is protecting somebody, or some persons.
I doubt he is getting paid off, or threatened. At his age? I don't think so.

How horribly disappointing some people can be.............people who have stood out as different and so much more reliable. And to think now we see him lying.

It is devastating to me.