Will Obama “Absorb” A False-Flag Terror Attack To Save His Presidency?


Glenn Zarmanov

President Obama recently made an ominous claim that America can “absorb” a terror attack, even on a large scale like 9/11, suggesting to many that an upcoming 9/11 Part 2 is in the works by the shadow government that controls the United States. During an interview with journalist Bob Woodward, the president said, “We can absorb a terrorist attack. We’ll do everything we can to prevent it, but even a 9/11, even the biggest attack ever . . . we absorbed it and we are stronger.”


Clearly this is a thinly veiled threat of a future government-sponsored event. Moreover, the wounds of 9/11 remain open as the American public reinvestigates for itself and discovers what truly took place that day. WeAreChangeNewJersey's recent movie screening of its new film 2001: The Year We Made Contact is an example of how people everywhere are setting the story straight. 9/11 was a coup d'état by the military-industrial complex, financed by the Federal Reserve (which itself, in turn is directed by even larger global institutions) who used this tragedy to hijack what was left of the American central command structure.

"To save America, we need another 9/11"
Philadelphia Inquirer | August 09, 2007
By Stu Bykofsky

To add insult to injury, these deranged social planners often throw their criminal acts in our faces in print, radio, tv, and movies ahead of schedule in order to plant subconscious psychological seeds that will get us to stand down and accept what is to take place. The BP Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico is a perfect example of this "predictive programming". Just days after the news story surfaced as an issue of significance, bloggers in the alternative media immediately found a strange coincidence. A movie that came out just a few months before apparently predicted the event AND the date on which it occurred.

This should not be surprising if you have seen the films 9/11/2001: A Space Odyssey and 2001: The Year We Made Contact, as they both cover various examples of how the world was desensitized to the 9/11 event before it took place. To fully understand what the next attack will look like, one need first examine our credibility over here at WeAreChangeNewJersey. I am 2/2 predicting major terror attacks that occurred from 2009-2010.
Just like Obama's quote at the start of this article, I noticed that the media was putting out talking points that were so suspicious that I immediately decided to document predictions for upcoming staged terror attacks, and unfortunately both of them came true about 7-8 days after I made each one. Also, to my dismay I turned out to be correct in saying that they were both government-sponsored conspiracies, not perpetrated merely by lone nuts. Before examining the evidence for the likelihood of another government-sponsored attack and its possible targets, please take the time to look over these past predictions.

Glenn Zarmanov Predicts Moscow Train Bombing:

Glenn Zarmanov Predicts Times Square Car Bombing:

Indeed, it was only two months ago that former Clinton advisor Robert Shapiro wrote in the Financial Times that the only thing that could save Obama’s tenuous grip on power was a terror attack on the scale of Oklahoma City or 9/11.“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” said Shapiro, adding, “He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”


Shapiro was clearly communicating the necessity for a terror attack to be launched in order to give Obama the opportunity to unite the country around his agenda in the name of fighting terrorists, just as President Bush did in the aftermath of 9/11 when his approval ratings shot up from around 50% to well above 80%.


So what do I think is going to happen this time? Well, I've made my prediction pretty clear: The global government gang will stage a large-scale physical attack on targets that include the Willis (formerly Sears) Tower, Eiffel Tower, or pretty much any iconic building, but particularly those with government offices or near them. While this is going on as a sleight of hand, the real attack will come in the form of a cyber-strike, potentially being used to shut down free speech and usher in the controlled Internet2 system, which is already being doled out in a massive PR campaign by Verizon and Google.

This seems like an obvious psychological test run for something big:

Eiffel Tower Bomb Threat was False Alarm
PARIS, Sept. 14, 2010

Here they are hyping terror attacks MONTHS ago:

Critics: Obama admin hyping terrorist nuclear risk
Wednesday, April 14, 2010

...and finally here they are hyping terror attacks TWO YEARS AGO:

November 15, 2008
Barack Obama is warned to beware of a ‘huge threat’ from al-Qaeda
Security officials fear a ‘spectacular’ during the transition period

"James Lewis, a security expert with the Centre of Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said that...'there may be political downsides' in attacking America too early...If they are gong to do something, they may wait until after the inauguration. '"

Obama warned: Expect a nuclear or biological terrorist attack by 2013
By Caroline Graham
2nd December 2008

This isn't fearmongering. If we warn enough people we can stop or minimize the attack, whoever is behind it. The government always uses psychological terrorism by hyping the attacks whether it executes them or not. Keep your eyes and ears open, and most importantly, don't say you weren't warned.