Al Jazeera links to 9/11 Truth web site

TvNewsLIES just posted an article from Al Jazeera's coverage of the 9/11 comments by Iranian President Ahmadinehad. The important segment of this article acknowledges that there is a real and vibrant group in the US and worldwide that challenges the official story of the attacks.

In the article, a section with the title 'Alternative Perspectives." includes the following:

"The most popular website on so-called alternative views on the September 11, 2001, attacks seems to be The site acts as a clearing house for an array of various views and refuses to articulate an exact position on who it believes launched the attacks and why. Rather, it poses a series of questions, while offering readers the "Top 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official Story".

A "documentary" called Loose Change questioning the official 9/11 narrative, has been popular among activist groups and other more traditional doubters.

"That 19 hijackers are going to completely bypass security and crash four commercial airliners in a span of two hours, with no interruption from the military forces, in the most guarded airspace in the United
States and the world? That to me is a conspiracy theory," Korey Rowe, the film's director, told Time magazine.

Mainstream media in the West, and even the US government itself, have felt a need to respond to these theories. The US state department's Bureau of International Information Programs has a website devoted to debunking the "top September 11 conspiracy theories".

In a piece titled "Why the 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Won't Go Away", Time argues that what many would call conspiracy theories are "not a fringe phenomenon".

'Planned demolition'

Some of the more unconventional claims include that the twin towers did not collapse from the impact of two Boeing 767s and the petrol stored in their tanks. Rather, the buildings collapsed in a planned, controlled demolition - perhaps through explosions in the basement.

Another popular theory is that a missile fired by elements from within the US government hit the Pentagon, rather than an aircraft. Some of the "alternative" or "conspiratorial" views come from people
who seem like serious scholars."

Full article here:

Why is the Ahmadinehad story missing from

Does anyone know why the Ahmadinehad story is missing from

probably because

It only happened a number of hours ago....

Any other theories?

it happened more than 24 hours ago.... This story is everywhere.

in reply to;

"The most popular website on so-called alternative views on the September 11, 2001, attacks seems to be "

I would have thought this website/'9/11 Blogger' would have been the most popular, it is my daily check of what goes on, is good but not a comprehensive or up to date as 911blogger.

in reply to:

I imagine some people are looking at 9/11 Truth on the internet for the first time today and may visit - especially if they put "9/11 Truth" into google or read Al Jazeera. -

Naomi, You ask important questions.
Janice and a few people have maintained the website for years. However, it consumes a lot of time and resources. It is tough to manage life, and also such an undertaking.
Funds and support have been slim.

Janice recently sent out this notice:
Three notes of interest -
1) The Calendar is available for you to use in posting your 9/11 anniversary events. After that it will be shut down, as it is very rarely used.
2) Our store is about closed, finally! I reinventoried the last of what we have and cut everything down to 1/2 price or less. If there's anything you want (lots of stickers left and deception dollars), please order now.
3) Our phone number will be shut down shortly. Henceforth, please use email to get in touch with me....

This article from 2006 is a good read...

A rapid growth occurred in 2005-2006 for the 9/11 Truth Movement. Many things were hitting the scene (e.g. Loose Change, C-Span's 9/11 American Scholars Symposium, etc.)

Part of the C-Span Symposium -
William Rodriguez at the Symposium

This is really very encouraging

And what the article mentions as the core of the 9/11 movement is reasonable.
Not perfect, but not bad.
They did not treat the movement as a crazy whacko group.

It will be interesting to see how the alternative media handles the Ahmadinejad speech. Alternet, CommonDreams, MotherJones, Counterpunch,, Nationmag, Truthout, etc...........
They are ALL under strict orders to censor all they can about 9/11 truth.
But how in the world do you ignore a major speech like this at the UN, and the walking out by the US representatives.
I'd imagine they will report it, and hope they can all move on.

we should contact them

congradulate them and provide more links to more info and evidence, include this site of course

anyone know how to do that?

It may make them shudder!