Did the Bush Crime Family Benefit Most From the Failed 9/11 Attacks?

link: http://upswing.newsvine.com/_news/2010/10/18/5309900-did-the-bush-crime-family-benefit-most-from-the-failed-911-attacks

Did the Bush Crime Family Benefit Most From the Failed 9/11 Attacks?
News Type: Event — Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:24 AM EDT.By upswing
In my opinion, the 9/11 attacks failed: If they had succeeded, then the White House and Congress would also have been destroyed, and the country would have been under martial law and under the sole control of Bush/Cheney.

But that's for a different article.

Just as interesting to me are the components of 9/11 that succeeded: specifically, the complete destruction of three buildings.

There are theories abounding as to what happened on 9/11, the most "tin-foil-hat-like" of which is the ridiculous official Boxcutter Conspiracy Theory offered to explain the events of 9/11 -- you know, 15, 19 or whatever number of Arabs in a cave outsmarting and debilitating the entire US military and intelligence structure.

The truth of the matter looks like it might be coming out, albeit slowly and painfully.

What is more solid than theories, however, is hard evidence regarding who benefited most from the events of 9/11.

Now, obviously, just because someone benefits from something, that doesn't mean they instigated that thing. Again, this article is not about theories.

However, it is still interesting to note that the Bush crime family, which has a multi-generational and intimate relationship with the nation's intelligence and banking industries, and their close friends, came out so much more ahead as a result of the events of 9/11 than the rest of us did.

Here is a top-of-my-head list of the ways in which the Bush crime family and their friends benefited directly from the events of 9/11:

1. Saddam Hussein was removed as an obstacle to the oil industry, which the Bush crime family is heavily invested in, getting control of Iraq's "suddenly uprated" oil supplies.

2. The demolition of WTC7, which was executed under cover of the attacks, meant that records supporting the SEC's case against Enron, which Bush's longstanding friendship with Enron CEO Ken Lay left him susceptible to was, in an instant, vaporized.

3. CIA records, which could easily have included the G.H. W. Bush's longstanding covert CIA activities were, simlarly, vaporized in an instant.

4. Bush was able to begin what is now known to be an illegal war against Iraq, in which he not only got access to Iraq's oilfields, but that Cheney's KBR and Halliburton scammed billions of dollars by allegedly "rebuilding" it.

5. The illegal invasion of Iraq also allowed Cheney's companies to make billions of dollars by "supporting" the US and allied militaries. (Some of that "support," of course, included poisoning and electrocuting US warriors.)

6. Bush got to implement the PATRIOT Act, which gave him an extraordinary amount of personal control by fiat over the country's society, commerce and economy.

7. Bush's War on Terror scared people into re-electing him for a second term.

Who else made out as well as this from those attacks?

Maybe you can think of other ways the Bush crime family benefited from the attacks, as well as other people who benefited from the attacks, too?

a good place to begin..

I appreciate this post.. following the money and who-benefits-trail is critical to know where to begin in a real investigation. Kevin Ryan wrote: "Understanding and destroying terrorism might simply be a matter of understanding and destroying organizations that continue to profit from 9/11." The article where I got this quote is very important as a resource for this thread: Carlyle, Kissinger, SAIC and Halliburton: A 9/11 Convergence

I also want to point out on the work of Christopher Story, who followed the money trail of the Bush crime family. One of his books on this subject is The New Underworld Order. He was also the editor of World Reports, until he died under suspicious circumstances. Flyby News published an intelligence report on this 02 August 2010.

And yet, I believe the most damning evidence on the reality of the Bush Crime Family comes from Russ Baker's book, "FAMILY OF SECRETS: The Bush Dynasty, the Powerful Forces That Put It in the White House, and What Their Influence Means for America" and perhaps even more significant is the information and power of the film by JFK researcher, John Hankey, Dark Legacy: George Bush and the Murder of John Kennedy. I highly recommend publicly screening this film around the anniversary of JFK's murder-coup d'etat, and bring up the discussions on how that connection relates to the coup d'etat of the 9/11 crime and continued deceptions for the NWO.

There's much more

8: The Florida-Recount was postponed in August 2001 till after 9/11, afterwards nobody had shown interest in the result, Gore won, both under- and overvotes.
This was hidden under false head lines in the middle of the newspapers.

9: ENRON makes the case for Dresser/Halliburton, as W.R. Grace and Waste Management were under SEC inspection also, it's likely the Bush/Cheney companies are somewhat involved in these scemes, too. Hints exists...

10: Dresser, Halliburton. That brings in Asbestos. Both Cheney and Bush gained a lot in not letting the public know how much asbestos was in the WTC and by creating a new law: http://www.nycosh.org/workplace_hazards/Asbestos/asbestos_index.html

More anyone?

Many of the people who benefited from the 911 crime

are still behind the scenes. We can only see the ones on this side of the public curtain. The criteria for measuring the benefit is also relevant. Is it just the amount of money made, lack of evidence to procecute other crimes, or concentration of power and control over the masses to mention some of the variables.