Bravo Niels !

...and thank you !

Video has been removed

by user. So what is going on here?

One thing that has kept me puzzled for a long time now:

How is it, that large quantities of paper sheets survived between all of the material (officefurniture etc.) that was turned to dust/powder?

It don't make sense to me right now, and I haven't seen any scientist look into this. Very high temperatures (created by thermitic reactions for instance) can apparently vaporize concrete, officie furniture and even human bodies, how is it that something relatively fragile like ordinary paper could survive such high temperatures?

ok now

thur 4th nov 02:35 uk time

how paper survives


Are you suggesting that because paper survived the attack on the towers that there is doubt about the use of explosives? Explosives produce a vast amount of gas very quickly. This is designed to have a destructive effect on anything solid but paper provides no resistance - it just blows away. The explosion center may be very hot but the expanding hot gas pushes cold air in front of it. The cold air pushes the paper away. In doing so it gets away from the region where high temperatures are created and where hot objects which could ignite it may remain.

I wonder

Might supporters of the OCT be able to cite such an explanation for why the alleged hijacker's passport was able to survive the rubble, with only slight damage? Or would such an explanation not be valid at all in that instance? And if not, why not? I like to be able to anticipate the objections of OCT defenders as much as possible. I'd be interested to know if you have any thoughts on this--thanks.

not very strong evidence

I am afraid the survival of the passport is not conclusive evidence. On the ground after the planes hit the buildings, and before they were demolished, there were many small objects like shoes, and pens. You can only use a probability argument. You can say it is much more likely that this type of object would be blown back out of the building than a passport, deep in a pocket, the pocket deep in the aircraft, and the aircraft deep inside the building.

You are right

that alone proves nothing.

But: Why don't we know the name of the guy who found it? The name of the policeman, who that passport was given? That should have been a "great" story for the media? All dead? Any line of evidence? Or planted evidence?
And why is that, that only arabic cards and passports were reportedly found? (the only other case I know of is the banking card of Waleed Iskandar)
No interest in other? Please keep in mind with "Framing" u use other guys ID's and with false and planted evidence you have all the "evidence" you need for blaing the right direction. And: Most of the alleged hijackers passports were copied or reported stolen before 9/11. Hints?

His name - Yuk H. Chin

"Suqami’s passport survived the attack: a passerby picked it up from the World Trade Center and
handed to a New York Police Department detective shortly before the towers
collapsed." 109

Checking this footnote we see the name of the Detective, and the "passerby's" description....

109 "The passport was recovered by NYPD Detective Yuk H. Chin from a male passerby in a business suit,
about 30 years old. The passerby left before being identified, while debris was falling from WTC 2. The
tower collapsed shortly thereafter. The detective then gave the passport to the FBI on 9/11. See FBI report,
interview of Detective Chin, Sept. 12, 2001."


It strains credulity, but I guess we will have to be careful dismissing this awesome jackpot passport find out of hand. Did they find any passports of other plane passengers? I don't doubt the passengers were on board, but why just Suqami? And before the Twin Towers collapsed? It smells. The guy who found the passport, wouldn't he want to tell his story? Maybe we'll learn more about this at some point. I'm in limbo about this.

Anyways, thanks for the relevant info, as always, Jim.


There are many NEW videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/ae911truth

AE911TRUTH You Tube Channel

Looking forward to the full DVD: 9/11: Explosive Evidence

– Experts Speak Out

Professor Niels Harrit is asking the NIST to research the presence of thermitic materials in the dust from the destruction of the three towers.

The NIST used to be a highly respected institution, but ever since they hung up enormous American flags covering all their windows, and delivered pseudo-science to the tune of researchers like Shyam Sunder and John Gross (see http://sunderandgrossostricharchive.blogspot.com ) they have LOST ALL CREDIBILITY to be involved in any type of major criminal investigation of forensic evidence, especially if the main suspect is the US government itself. Are we also going to ask the Pentagon to please investigate itself on irregularities in the official version of what happened at the Pentagon in the wing of the building just recently “renovated” and reinforced by a secretive UK company? AMEC also managed to take on another urgent job to renovate the electrical system in WTC 7 shortly before it performed its quite suspicious pulverization act (see : http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/lofiversion/index.php?t631.html ) and then proceeded to help clean up the mess, with full security clearances, on the crime scenes in both New-York and Washington.

In a criminal investigation, it is not common practice to let the main suspect investigate itself.

In what he called “Difficult questions for slow learners”, M. Elias Davidsson puts it this way:

“Given that...
(a) Three thousand people were suddently murdered in the capital of country X
(b) The government of that country fails to identify the perpetrators
(c) The government of the country cannot properly explain how the murder was committed
(d) The government of the country does not want to investigate the murder
(e) The government of the country orders the destruction of criminal evidence
(f) The government of the country bribes the families of the victims to ask no questions
(g) The government of the country intimidates, harasses and gags witnesses

Who should be designated as the primary suspect for the murder?
(a) The government of country X ?
(b) Ali Baba and his 19 minions?
(c) The Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra?

If you solved this arduous question, you have successfully mastered the first class. You can obtain from me the graduation certificate for the first class and you are welcome to enter the second class. In that class we will deal with the question how to organize a peaceful, radical, democratic revolution.”

Eric’s comment continued: Thanks to the painstaking scientific work of people like those behind www.AE911Truth.org , we are now, 9 years after the crime, still a bit slow learners, but the penny seems to be beginning to drop, (not much thanks to, but more like despite our long professional or academic expertise), that the main suspect is the US government itself, and it is not reasonable/credible to allow the government to investigate itself. We need an urgent regime change, to put the people back in power, and cease the “State of Emergency” based on “outside terrorists” that Rumsfeld & Cheney installed at 11 AM on Sept. 11th 2001 in the COG-elite’s carefully planned “coup d’Etat” on the American Democracy.

Some broader cultural efforts to increase the general awareness about the criminality that has been going on will be needed to achieve the “peaceful, radical, democratic revolution” that Elias Davidsson is calling for.

50 years after the 60ies, it is time for a quantum jump of awareness in our society!

Thank-you all for your brave and precious contribution to make this happen !

Eric http://patriotsquestion911.com/medical.html#Beeth


Eric, Elias, and Niels!

We are blessed to have people

like Niels on our side, doing such great work.

We are damned to have the media be so full of worthless journalists who decide that this story is to be kept from not just Americans, but from the world.

If only there were investigators with the great talents of people like Niels to find out just how the mainstream media, and even the antiwar/progressive media, has come to this censorship of one of the biggest stories in human history.

Any takers?

Seems like we need more

Seems like we need more scientists to denounce the OCT.

This information is from concerned scientists regarding the thwarting of science, by way of political agendas, superseding reality. Maybe we ought to get the numbers growing to gain more credibility in this field, as Richard Gage has done with the architects and engineers. Let's start contacting offices of these thousands of scientists who have denounced Bush's (and now Obama's) disregard for real science. Here is a start.

If our scientists get endorsed by these guys, we'd probably start gaining more momentum, yet. We are in a race against the demise of this society.

National Headquarters
Two Brattle Sq.
Cambridge, MA 02138-3780
Phone: (617) 547-5552
Fax: (617) 864-9405

Washington, DC, Office
1825 K St. NW, Ste. 800
Washington, DC 20006-1232
Phone: (202) 223-6133
Fax: (202) 223-6162

West Coast Office
2397 Shattuck Ave., Ste. 203
Berkeley, CA 94704-1567
Phone: (510) 843-1872
Fax: (510) 843-3785

Midwest Office
One N. LaSalle St., Ste. 1904
Chicago, IL 60602-4064
Phone: (312) 578-1750
Fax: (312) 578-1751

Does this organization have a name?

Do they have a website?

Please provide a bit more information so that anyone who is interested in contacting them knows who they are contacting.


This was the web

This was the web site...



UCS stands for the Union of Concerned Scientists. That organization has a very good anti-war history.

From their 'About Us' statement:

"The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.

"What began as a collaboration between students and faculty members at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1969 is now an alliance of more than 250,000 citizens and scientists. UCS members are people from all walks of life: parents and businesspeople, biologists and physicists, teachers and students. Our achievements over the decades show that thoughtful action based on the best available science can help safeguard our future and the future of our planet. "

Thank you

Thank you

Great job on the video!

Great job on the video!

Nanofibres defuse explosives

'This work establishes nanothermite as an accepted and completely regular origin of explosive and pyrotechnic material,' says Niels Harrit at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark, who has experience working with nanothermites. 'It brings nanothermite into the mainstream of science,' he adds.