Support 911Blogger


Colorado Public Television to Broadcast Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup

Source: http://colorado911visibility.org/2010/11/27/colorado-public-television-to-broadcast-loose-change-911-an-american-coup/

Press Release
Saturday, November 27, 2010
Colorado Public Television

Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup
Saturday, December 4 at 7:00 pm on Channel 12.1

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION:
With the departure of the Bush Administration and the arrival of an “era of transparency,” opportunities are arising for the disclosure of new information that may shed more light on the events that took place before and after 9/11/2001. This film takes viewers on a turbulent journey through several pivotal moments in history before delving into the most significant catastrophe in recent memory, 9/11. Loaded with powerful, new footage and in-depth interviews with the likes of Steven Earl Jones, an American physicist who has discovered undetonated explosive material in multiple samples of dust from the World Trade Center collapses, this documentary presents a wide array of evidence. The American people continue to live in the aftermath of 9/11 and deal with its ongoing repercussions. Is this just another machination of power on the timeline of history? If so, the real question is what happens next? Or better yet, what can we do to prevent another 9/11? LOOSE CHANGE 9/11 serves as a fundamental call to action which is fueled by hope that those affected by 9/11 will soon receive the answers that they have sought after for nearly a decade.

WHY CPT12 IS AIRING THIS FILM:
Last year, in response to numerous viewer requests, Colorado Public Television (CPT12) aired two independent films, 911 PRESS FOR TRUTH and 911 BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH. It was the United States’ broadcast television debut for each of these controversial films, both of which question the official reports of what happened surrounding the attacks on September 11, 2001.

Presented as part of CPT12's fundraising efforts, the station interrupted each film's broadcast to feature in-studio guests who discussed the films and the station's mission of providing access to diverse and opposing viewpoints. The in-studio guests included Kyle Hence, Bob McIlvane, Ray Nowosielski and Richard Gage, AIA.

While both programs helped raise funds for Channel 12, their broadcasts were not without controversy. Our evening of 9/11 programming generated many comments from the press as well as a huge groundswell of feedback from CPT12 viewers and members.

Many viewers thanked the station for airing content that has been neglected by mainstream media – whether they agreed with the official story explaining the events of 9/11, the alternative theories presented in the films, or were undecided. In fact, we heard from people all over the country.

Some of the feedback included complaints about the program breaks and our in-studio guests – that the station was only presenting a one-sided view that supported the alternative theories of the “Truth Movement” or “Truthers.” While these two films did argue alternate theories, Colorado Public Television has also aired PBS programs focused on the official story of 9/11. These include NOVA's "Why the Towers Fell" and "Building on Ground Zero" as well as AMERICAN EXPERIENCE's "The Center of the World."

Taking all feedback, criticisms and requests into account, Colorado Public Television is now airing LOOSE CHANGE 9/11: AN AMERICAN COUP.

Throughout the broadcast, the station will interrupt the program to discuss the film's perspectives and to raise funds for Colorado Public Television. These program breaks will include multiple viewpoints – both for and against the film's content. Guests will include Kevin Ryan, a 911 Whistleblower, plus a representative for the official story of 9/11. Additionally, we will air a range of comments from people in the community, comments from filmmakers Dylan Avery and Korey Rowe, and others.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?
CPT12 provides a platform for discussion and encourages you to do your own research if you are interested in this subject matter. You can also share your comments and opinions, or read what others have to say at the bottom of this page.

9/11 Resources Supporting Alternative Theories:

9/11 Resources Supporting the Official Story:

Most excellent !! CPT 12 Rocks !!!

I'll have to see if some of my smaller local public television stations are willing to follow their Colorado counterpart.

I like the format they're using too.

Thanks for posting this great news!

Cheers.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

Wow!

Amazing!

Bravo Colorado

Just get people thinking then they will come to their own conclusions.
This film will do that.

Here is part 1 of 10

an informed electorate

Didn't we see a post recently that the Colorado Democratic Platform now officially calls for a new investigation? Is this correlation or causation? I think causation. The general public in that Colorado area over the last year has also seen 911 PRESS FOR TRUTH and 911 BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH.

ahab, exactly what I was about to say,

as the people get exposed they demand more answers. This is a text book example.

Would the Dem Platform have had that Truth plank if the Public TV station never ran the movies????

My unscientific , but nonetheless 100% accurate reply is: no, nay, never.

So, moral of the story...........flood your local PTV statoins with polite requests and lots of free DVDs!!!

The situation is analagous to NYC's

"BuildingWhat?" campaign and HUGELY influential TV ad.

Some well placed media exposure can really blow this thing up....in a good way.

Although the jury is still out on the whole Rivera/JudgeNAp/Fox enigma (as to motivation, long term strategy etc) I think we are all mostly in agreement none of it would have taken place if not for "THE AD"

We may well look back in 3-4 years and point to "THE AD" as the turning point.

BC and AD

BC is clearly the Age of the Before Commercial years- eg 9/11 happened in 9BC
AD is clearly the Age of the ADvert years- eg the 10th anniversary of 9/11 will be in 2AD

AD is a more enlightened Age, clearly thanks to www.buildingwhat.org

we will assimilate you

One by one, we must assimilate high value personalities into our collective understanding of 911 truth. The public in general relies on these personalities to filter for them the issues that demand their attention. There is trust and unspoken loyalty and credibility established between these personalities and the consumers of their opinions. We fail to engage the public in these issues if we fail to convince their authorities. We must adapt to this challenge with a concerted effort to focus our attention where it is most effective and convincing.

Regarding the use of online petitions such as at ae911truth.org which I support and am a signatory of, I view this method of increasing our ranks of supporters as a passive effort and the ever so tediously rising numbers of signatories lack the impact that the disinterested public psyche requires to assign the 911 issue enough credence to give it serious consideration. Now please don't misunderstand what I mean by passive because I'm not saying that proactive work hasn't been a part of this process. Thank you Richard Gage for all you do, sir. What I mean is that the slowyly growing numbers of signatories does not impact believers of the OCT as much as it has more personal meaning for the signatory himself.

But in contrast to a "passive" online petition, and on the other side of the spectrum, standing up in public meetings and shouting our mantras at media personalities likely yields not only neutral benefits but negative benefits.

I propose a new strategy.

I believe we need to form delegates from each professional body of supporters for a new investigation who will act in a coordinated blitz attack strategy at specific political and media targets. For example, the 911 delegates (maybe from Pilots, Architects, Intelligence Prof. Scholars, etc, etc), acting in concert and backed by the general supporters, should choose a target on whom to concentrate our education efforts. We can start with Geraldo the first month and then try Keith Olberman.

We need to FORCE this issue on the agenda, one personality at a time, cracking the mental barriers and delusions and letting the viewers ultimately (but not initially) witness the conversions themselves by the undeniably massive overwhelming volume of evidence lying at their feet. I don't believe these delegates should make their approach public initially. I believe there needs to be a whole new level of sober tact applied to our approach and that these high value media and political targets should not be engaged in their natural elements in which they are most likely to be defensive, adversarial, resistant, or bound by sound bite time constraints.

Force AMY GOODMAN to look at this issue like never before
Force NOAM CHOMSKY to look at this issue and see that the scientific articles do indeed exist
Force KEITH OLBERMAN and JON STEWART and BILL MAHER to engage with us on a level that allows them to think critically rather than to formulate habitual responses to our efforts that come from the awareness that their home audience is watching them on camera!! We must stop engaging these people in their elements and think they aren't going to be defensive!

6 years ago when i was baying for UBL's blood and glorifying in

war*, Amy Goodman was giving the 9/11 truth movement the oxygen of publicity

http://www.democracynow.org/2004/5/26/the_new_pearl_harbor_a_debate

i have no beef with her

I tend to respect and end up more or less agreeing 95+% with snowcrash's opinion though i take everything with a grain or 2 of salt and think things through myself these days, so -

snowcrash, any beef with AG ?

* i shipped USAF equipment to the middle east via Bahrain around that time and felt like that was like two fingers up to the (I thought unpatriotic) protesters (linked with muslim agitators) who had hampered my journey into work at Heathrow during the mass demos in london uk

Amy

You can

operation educate

I've thrown my hands in the air dumbfounded at failing to successfully engage with friends and family members on Facebook about this issue. Collective apathy? Collective sense of powerlessness? Indifference? Credibility of the messenger?

I don't think we can engage the greater public interest without somehow showing that these things matter to the average person on a day to day scale.

Is it because people feel reasonably secure that they can fill up their tank with gas or shop at Walmart or chat on Facebook openly about personal issues that everything in America seems to be just fine?

How do we make people who normally want nothing to do with political issues realize first of all
1)that there is a grand underlying problem with our society (local, national, global),
2)that the system will not correct itself,
3)that these problems really do affect their daily lives AND
4) somehow empower them to know we can do something about it?

...

There is a comment at another thread that relates to your question here.

I think maybe the biggest problem is our lack of positive alternatives to suggest. We need to develop lots of those, IMO -- and as you say, they need to be easily available, and do-able on a daily scale.

M.K. Gandhi back then had people spinning, for example -- not that that idea in particular has anything to do with what we face here; I am only saying we need workable alternatives that actually address the situation.

Nice!

Civilized and simple.

Happening now...

The next false-flags, wikileaks and Korea. Get ready, it isn't over yet.

AE911Truth Funds the PBS Ads!

Get set for the 5-minute mini doc on WTC 7 to be aired on PBS now that the chip in has been reached.

This happened fast.

Excellent

news

They added some interviews

on their homepage, but I found no other news about how it was going and the comments it received. Anyone?

Update

Last night's event at Colorado Public Television Channel 12 (formerly KBDI) was awesome. I was part of the phone bank taking pledges and I can tell you that we were pretty busy taking pledges and got many positive comments from the callers. I personally did not take any complaint calls this time and overall from what I could see there was less criticism, perhaps because there was representation from the other side. However, I did not talk to Shari about any of that nor how they did with regards to the stations fund raising goals. I can say that from past experiences, when the phones have been that busy the station did very well so thanks to any of those who called in to support this historic broadcast.

Channel 12 had Leland Rucker in the studio to represent the official story. After starting with some of the heads of NIST and working their way down, Mr. Rucker was brought into the studio to represent the official story because the station literally could not find anyone else. They were even willing to do Skype interviews. Mr. Rucker works at Free Speech TV, http://www.freespeech.org/ . Because we were so busy on the phones, I did not get to hear much of what Mr. Rucker had to say during the program but from what I did hear, and what others have told me who heard, his arguments were less than impressive. Also, through a taped interview for the official story Chris Mohr made an appearance. http://kbdiondemand.org/client_files/Preview/LC10.mp4
I thought his arguments were full of rhetoric and lacking on substance.

Kevin Ryan was present in the studio for our side and did an awesome job. Thanks again Kevin!

We hope to have video from the station soon so that we can cut out the breaks and post on youtube so everyone can see for themselves how the event unfolded.

You can read the comments from others, and leave some of your own at http://www.cpt12.org/community/viewer_buzz.cfm?s=343&ta=1

Thanks for the update Michael

Sounds like it was fantastic.

Thanks to everyone involved.

YES! The Comments are great.
http://www.cpt12.org/community/viewer_buzz.cfm?s=343&ta=1

Must be 9 to 1or so in favour of truth

even before it was linked here.

I hope

you'll consider posting on other sites that do not mandate video splitting as well. Even better would be downloadable source material, posted on archive.org, as I did here:

http://www.archive.org/details/DefenseDepartmentWitnessSuggestsCoverUpIn...

Ironically, MSM media players and interactive video sites such as Youtube often get in the way of the interaction between us (the consumers) and you (the producers), either through technical obstructions or through censorship.

Hi Michael...great to see you here and with such good news!

I know at present Michael and the Visibility 9-11 Podcast/Site are in need of funds. Please consider giving a small contribution...

http://www.visibility911.com/donate.php

Kind regards John