David Horowitz Confronted by We Are Change @ CPAC2011
Newtonian_Physics Wed, 02/16/2011 - 11:45pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoz0PlpRT7U
Luke Rudkowski and Anthony Antonello confront David Horowitz on 9/11 at CPAC, Washington D.C. 2011.
They are very polite and actually get him to admit he hasn't even looked at the evidence, and doesn't even want to.
- Newtonian_Physics's blog
- Login to post comments
David Horowitz is an ignoramus
Unfortunately, this is what comes to mind when seeing someone who has the audacity to say (in reply to the comment that he has written or debated 911 issues) "I was probably only attacking Rosie O'Donnell on a blog or something" right before admitting that he hasn't looked at any evidence for domestic culpability in the crimes of Sept. 11, 2001, and further adds to the reasons for applying such a label to him when he makes the comment that he doesn't have any inclination to do so.
This guy is the epitome of what Albert Einstein was referring to when he said
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance."
Good job Anthony in getting this ignoramus to actually admit this on tape. I think a better term for people like him might be "horse's ass" and it is truly a shame that he, and anyone like him, has any influence in our press.
Horowitz Is A Toxic Ideologist
He's little more than a component in the manufactured left v. right theater that keeps the public divided along lines created by the media and political parties.
Luke discusses his confrontations
Luke Rudowski: Luke Discusses The Confrontation of a Lifetime! -1/2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uc8aPx-p8mk&feature=player_embedded
Luke Rudowski: Luke Discusses The Confrontation of a Lifetime! - 2/2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAL9w7TYA5M&feature=player_embedded
Thats Better!!!
Thats the best I've ever seen Luke, I hope he continues his approach that way from now on ;)
Heresy!
The last question to Horowitz, was "would you be interested in looking at the evidence?"
I replayed the clip several times, and (Horowitz) shakes his head with what appeared to be a negative response. Horowitz' response typifies much of what we hear from many influential folk, when confronted with certain facts about 9/11 that don't gel with their world view. Evidence, schmevidence!! ie STFU!
Here we have a classic current day equivalent to what Galileo faced when he found *EVIDENCE* via observation through his telescope that the Sun, rather than the Earth, is the center of the Solar System. His findings were deemed heresy by the Vatican authorities, who even refused to look through the telescope to see for themselves. Their minds, just like today's proponents of the official 9/11 fairytale, were already made up. Facts are considered minor, insignificant irritations, anyone who doubts the conventional "wisdom" (read ossified stupidity) is not even permitted to enter the discussion, and the media renders the subject taboo.
Alongside the Einstein quote posted earlier, the following quotation (from Adolf Hitler) seems appropriate in these (bizarre) circumstances:
"What luck for rulers than men do not think".