in her cogent remarks regarding science as a way of knowing, and how NIST has not been "playing by the rules of science" in its analysis of the fall of the WTC buildings.

She speaks favorably of the research on the red+gray chips found in the WTC dust and how this is science -- which unfortunately is ignored by NIST.

Well done, Prof. Margulis, and thank you for speaking out.

I'm well versed with 9/11 truth and here we have these amazing people coming forth to be interviewed. I understand that these clips are in a "raw footage" format but the way the one sided statements are being cut together, I am left feeling uncomfortable.

If I were on youtube searching for 9/11 truth, (and not knowing any better) I would likely dismiss these amazing interviews because without the interviewer's questions being posed, it feels as though the interviewee is being prompted by a script. All sense of a candid discussion is tossed into what looks like one talking point after another.

Devotees might vote this comment deep into the ground but I am only conveying my immediate reaction with each edit I perceive (to shorten the time?) and the strong desire I feel in wanting to hear the question posed (by the interviewer) before I hear the answer.

I am suspecting that other people (in the blogosphere) might feel the same way. I'm willing to put these thoughts out there because I would hate these interviews to be discredited by the debunkers for the reasons I mention above.

It might be a best to not publish these interviews publicly until they are edited to a complete, candid exchange between the interviewer and interviewee. It would lend to the credibility of the piece. In this case I think it would be worth the wait.

If we are ever to get a new independent investigation into 9/11, it will be because of the courage of all these
intellectual professionals who have spoken out. I recently read two articles , "Energetic materials a potential cause of 9/11 first responder illnesses" written by Kevin Ryan, and "FDNY Rescue Workers Show Lasting Lung Damage From 9/11 World Trade Center Dust" by Montefiore Medical Center. From my understanding of these articles there may be evidence of thermite or nano-thermite in the lung tissue of the many of the tens of thousands suffering one form or the other of respiratory illness. I would like to see some medical researchers step forward and speak out about this. Almost 1,000 9/11 responders have died to date and if
these red/gray unignited aluminothermic explosives dust particles can be positively identified in the lung tissues of any of the other 60,000 who are presently suffering respiratory illnesses maybe the American people will open their minds to why the need for a new investigation is so important.