Source of terror threat is in UK Government, says a police Principal Intelligence Analyst

Tony Farrell had been employed for twelve years as ‘Principle Intelligence Analyst’ for South Yorkshire Police, 13th largest of the 44 police forces in the UK. His job involved producing a yearly ‘Strategic Threat Assessment Matrix’ to determine how the police force had to prioritise its activities. Assessed ‘threats’ ranged from ASBOs (anti-social behaviour orders) to the terrorist threat presented by local mosques. Having a statistics degree, it was his job to translate the different ‘strategic threats’ into a ‘matrix’ of relative numerical weighted probabilities.

In 2010, one week before the 5th anniversary of 7/7, Tony (who had never previously doubted government versions of events) stumbled across ‘9/11 Truth’ material on the web. Like so many millions before him, he was shocked to the core by this experience. He quickly realised that there was a great mass of evidence relating to 9/11 kept hidden by the mainstream media. As a Christian, Tony consulted his church minister, who suggested that he consider, whether the same might be true for the London 7/7 bombings?

Something he had not suspected ‘in his wildest dreams’ then started to unfold. After reading much of the available but publicly-unreported witness statements and other evidence relating to 7/7, Tony found that he could only conclude that the official 7/7 narrative was ‘a monstrous lie.’ Instead of the official ‘suicide bombers’ narrative, which he and all of his colleagues had believed without question, he realised that the weight of evidence strongly points far more towards 7/7 being an event stage-managed by British intelligence than anything else.

The unthinkable but inescapable question thus intruded: Does there exist an ‘internal tyranny’ worse than any external foe?

All the assumptions he had held about the ‘strategic threat’ from terrorism were shattered and lay in ruins, and he found himself now doubting the size of any threat allegedly coming from Al-Qaeda and home-grown extremists. Within the police service, he felt horribly alone not knowing who to talk to about this matter – a situation made acute because he would have to present his annual threat assessment to the ‘Intelligence Strategic Management Board’ on July 8th - mere days away.

From his Christian perspective 9/11 and 7/7 could only now be perceived as expressions of a Satanic dimension concerning the ascent of what everybody was calling a ‘New World Order’. He saw these deceitful events as false-flag operations perpetrated in order to justify illegal and wicked wars. This was a deep personal crisis – one that would terminate his career.

On July 6th he ‘stuck his head above the parapet’ by alerting his boss – that he was developing a very different conceptual model of the strategic threat.

The terse document he handed over, suggested that the untruth of the 9/11 story implied ‘a huge potential for a total breakdown in trust between the government and the masses’ and it warned of ‘a tipping-point’ that would surely arrive as it slowly dawned upon citizens that their own government had conspired against them and had lied to them and had murdered innocents in the process.

Likewise he warned that, if indeed 7/7 had been ‘deliberately engineered’ to justify British PM Tony Blair standing shoulder to shoulder with Bush in the illegal was in Iraq, ‘There will be total outrage within the masses and a complete breakdown of trust between the Government and the people of the UK.’

More at:

Check the sources

This article is largely based on an interview Farrell gave to a major source of tv-fakery/space beams disinfo. Also, Nick Kollerstrom, who runs and the author of the above article, is a notorious holocaust denier.

Always beware of the "Guilt by Association" trick.

Agreed, Gareth, it is essential to check the sources. But having said that, we cannot deny that there are powerful methods used by those who wish to maintain "official versions" of controversial events, to trash the credibility of those who express skepticism of such "official versions".

One of these methods is "guilt by association"... and one of the common unmentionable "associations" they tend to use, on account of the its bogusness and crassness, is Holocaust denial.

Farrell is obviously a credible person with an unblemished track record in law enforcement... and as such, could be extremely damaging to the powers that be in the UK, should his story get wide exposure. What a great way of trashing his credibility, by organizing an interview with someone who has a track record of Holocaust denial?

Other "guilt by association with the non-credible" which rank high on the "wacko scale" are: "Denial of the Apollo Moon mission", claims of a "New World Order", association with research into "Illuminati"/Masonic /secret societies, UFOs, "lizard aliens" (!) and "chem trails". It matters not whether there is any truth or reality to these issues... as far as the mainstream is concerned, they have all been cast into the trash-bin of "wild conspiracy looney tunes land".

A number of prominent 9/11 researchers (alongside other high visibility controversies) have been linked to various of these emotional, wacko "hot button" issues, all of which have negative of non-credible associations in the mainstream, and these associations help in keeping the perps of 9/11 (and 7/7/ etc etc) away from the justice they deserve, and the prison cells in which they should be permanently locked.

Anyone remember Eric Hufshmidt? Although he did some good initial research on the demise of the Twin Towers, it appears that he might have been railroaded into 9/11 research (without his knowledge) in order to discredit the budding Truth Movement... Hufschmidt already had had an association with both Holocaust denial and Apollo mission skepticism.

By associating Farrell with Kollerstrom, the baby disappears down the plug-hole, along with the murky bathwater.

Very "Nicely" done.

My first comment

was a irresponsible in as much as i was actually trying to alert a moderator because this was on the front page. I've since contacted the moderators and it's been sorted out.

IMO Farrell is a nice guy but his knowledge of 9/11 + 7/7 is pretty limited. He also clearly lacks judgement otherwise he wouldn't have chosen a disinfo outlet to tell his story.