Why the NIST report on the WTC towers is false

Here's a new video in which The NIST World Trade Center report for the Twin Towers is examined and shown to be false and unscientific.

Uploaded by DK1Ryan on Aug 14, 2011


Bob Coen, who made the film "Anthrax War," has also launched a new site that is in preparation for his new film.


The Anthrax War was very good, so this is great news if he does take on the dust in a similar way. They got some media attention with that film too.

And thanks to Kevin Ryan for another video!

The PsyOp

The PsyOp has been so effective in part because nano-engineered incendiaries provided the heat that was assumed by most to have been generated by jet fuel.
The "jet fuel" argument explains everything [regarding the collapses] adequately to those unversed in chemistry and physics. Those responsible for NIST's final report know this. All of the obfuscators know this.

~obviously the steel burned hot enough, it was doused in JET FUEL!~

"Jet Fuel" was repeated many thousands of times in the weeks following 9/11.

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."

If the lie is charged with enough emotion, believers will attack when you dare to question it. Their "sanity" depends on them being "right."

"Their "sanity" depends on

"Their "sanity" depends on them being "right."

The "ego" insists it cannot be conned.

"Fuel" was cause of Building 7's Collapse

"Fuel" was the cause of Building 7's Collapse, too. At least that's what 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey had to say about it in this under-circulated 2009 video (scroll to 3:50 for the beginning of Kerrey's 9/11 statements).

As reported here, 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said in Oct 2009 that he still believed that WTC7 came down because "that building was full of fuel". So exactly what fuel would that be Commissioner Kerrey? Not jet fuel ... as much havoc as it unleased in the twin towers, not even NIST ever claimed that fuel from the jets was involved with the collapse of Building 7. So are are you referring to the long-ago abandoned (by NIST) diesel fuel tank theory? Sorry Senator Kerrey, but the 7-year-in-the-making NIST final report concluded that "The heat from the uncontrolled fires caused steel floor beams and girders to thermally expand, leading to a chain of events that caused a key structural column to fail. The failure of this structural column then initiated a fire-induced progressive collapse of the entire building."

For God's sake, is it asking too much that one of the actual 9/11 Commissioners would be at least well-informed enough to realize that this 2008 report ruled out the fuel tank theory? {sarc on} I mean, yes, it did take 7 years to publish the final report, but it did settle the matter, right? {sarc off}

Kerry's statements, on video, leave holes big enough to drive trucks through, yet he has never been asked to explain his odd remarks. This culture of denial in which we find ourselves is letting the crime of the century or more slip unmolested into fake history. Another 10 years and the "experiencing generation" will fall into an oblivion of chatter and endless debate. Unless ... unless.

Later in the video series, Kerrey talks openly about 9/11 being part of a larger "30-year conspiracy" as if it's known in certain circles, yet once again this former 9/11 Commissoner has never once been pressed about what in the world he was referring to.

NIST had to back off of diesel fuel being involved

in the collapse of WTC 7 because most of it was recovered from the tanks sitting in what could be called mini-basements below the building.

The analyses for the twin towers also showed that the jet fuel would have been burned off within minutes and would have only really been involved in igniting the initial fires. Spraying about half of the 10,000 gallons on board each plane over multiple floors of the Twin Towers only leaves a thin film of fuel. The majority of the fuel was in the wings which were spread over five or six floors and at 500 mph whatever didn't go up in the fireball outside would have been dispersed widely in an aersolized way, so there would not have been a large volume capable of going down an elevator shaft either.

Thanks again Kevin,

for yet another article that shows how blatantly criminal NISTs mgt is and how pathetically impotent their engrs and techs are ... and this one is far from your and others best work lol.

Like the WTC structures ability to withstand the govt described loads (only) they supposedly saw on 9/11, this video also redundantly describes facts and arguments which prove that CDs of some tech were necessary to accomplish what we witnessed.

I hope you don't feel the need to further prove yourself on this ... only a complete fool would fail to see the necessity to properly investigate the WTC collapses as CDs. Those idiots will never be swayed by facts of physics and logic.

Best Wishes

Adding another group

Adding another group to the fools and blatant shills are a majority of the employees and families and friends of those who work for these companies directly and those who businesses are greatly benefitted by them.


"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair

I'm sure we all know a few that this pertains to directly ... perhaps some that before their employment with these companies may have even understood something???