Get Richard Gage on Countdown with Keith Olbermann!

Send tweets to Keith Olbermann:

@KeithOlbermann -- Richard Gage from Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth : in New York around 9/11. PLEASE interview him!!!

Also, Thumbs Up this Current TV request:

Maybe he will do it now that he's on a smaller network and more in charge.

Spread the word so we get as many people tweeting him and voting for the CTV request.

Then cross your fingers and/or pray.

Believing that 9-11 was put together by a guy hiding in a cave

Believing that 9-11 was put together by a guy hiding in a cave in Afghanistan and a handful of guys armed with box cutters is like believing that JFK was killed by a "magic bullet" is simple ( we make it complicated...)


One is a scientifically isolated and clearly identifiable problem and the other is an argument of personal incredulity. So there is a difference, and there should be. Evidence for deliberate building destruction other than caused by airplanes does not mean hijackers do not exist. Bin Laden didn't "hide in a cave" before 9/11 (he may have visited cave complexes) I've never thought this meme did 9/11 Truth any good in PR efforts.

PS: I hope Gage does go on Olbermann.


the fact that planes were flown into buildings does not prove that said planes were manually flown into said buildings by alleged "hijackers" (absent additional credible evidence, of course).

This is why we need new, transparent and complete investigations, yes?

Additionally, some very well educated people do spend time in caves, archeologists come immediately to mind.

Finally, I see no need to continually push these basic logic lessons here, as I do not think there is a significant demographic on this site that suffers from this particular logic impairment. You are on the verge of becoming pedantic in regard to this particular non-issue (on this site).

I also hope that Mr. Olbermann has the courage to have Richard Gage and/or Kevin Ryan on his show.

Only 13 +1's So Far on the Current TV Request.

As Pat Curley of the Screw Loose Change blog has pointed out, Olbermann has flirted with LIHOP.

Olbermann has stated that it is the Bush administration's "criminal neglect that allowed the attacks to occur."

And he was the only major U.S. media source to cover the Cheney Iran false flag story.

Olbermann has stated that the idea that the Twin Towers were blown up "may be a lot stronger stuff than most Americans can contemplate," but that was back in 2006. In late 2010, when FOX News host Judge Andrew Napolitano made comments supportive of the demolition hypothesis, Frances Martel of the Mediaite blog noted that Olbermann didn't "take any particular issue" with Napolitano's comments. So maybe with some goading he will flirt with 9/11 truth a bit more!

Please be aware

That Olbermann lost several friends on 9/11. If any of this ever comes to pass, Richard should bring a family member like Bob McIlvaine. Follow the same format as was done with Fox News. Simply insist that the NIST reports were inadequate, even fraudulent and explain why. Explain how such brazen departures from the scientific method go against Obama's hypocritical proclamation in 2008:

The truth is that, promoting science isn't just about providing resources, it's about protecting free and open inquiry. It's about ensuring that facts and evidence are never twisted or obscured by politics or ideology. It's about listening to what our scientists have to say, even when it's inconvenient, especially when it's inconvenient. Because the highest purpose of science is the search for knowledge, truth and a greater understanding of the world around us. That will be my goal as President of the United States, and I could not have a better team to guide me in this work.

— President elect Barack Obama

Source (time: 1:45.)

Push for a follow up

Thinking in that regard people might try forwarding the Tony Szamboti/ Bob McIlvaine interview w/ Geraldo to Olberman. Push for a follow up.


The very low number of comments here and comments and counts at the
linked-to site are the reason why the so-called 9/11 Truth Movement (sans Justice)
is what and where it is today. (I bet there weren't hardly any tweets, either)
(not to mention the stagnate and failing "signature" counts at AE911Truth)

There isn't a chance in Hell of anything happening about anything.

Not anytime soon, and probably not ever.

Oh well, the sooner "the movement" switches from T&J to "Ever Vigilant, Never Again"
mode the better. I guess we're already actually there and, like a chicken with its head cut off,
we haven't realized (or accepted) it yet.

Viva la Rev-o-lut-i-on! *cough* *cough* *hack* sputter*
(no, it will NOT be televised)
Can we go home now?


I've wondered about the low number of comments here in recent months. A good example is this blog post:

Even the protesting around the anniversary is covered not by 911Blogger, but by The New York Times:

(We Finns are famous for blunt in-your-face-directness)