10th Anniversary 9/11 Truth Hit Piece Roundup

So much space devoted to mindless, dismissive ridicule and hand-waving, so little time devoted to any kind of investigative journalism. If you're a glutton for punishment or just want a handy compilation of the corporate media's extreme bias and neglect of duty, this one's for you. More than thirty 10th anniversary hit pieces in one place...


With little regard for those family members who question the official account of the 9/11 attacks, mainstream media news outlets have published over 30 inaccurate, derogatory, and stereotyping hit pieces in the 2 weeks leading up to the tenth anniversary of the attacks. Among the articles there are many common themes, sources, logical fallacies and insults. The mainstream media has offered an unprecedented level of apparent bias against reasonable people invested in justice for the victims of 9/11.

When the TRUTH sinks in...

the blinders come off and people realize just how "Orwellian" everything has become.

I talked to a lot of people over the last few days who know, many as a result of my efforts, and no one regrets having found out.

Despite the ridicule WE persists, our numbers are growing, WE are everywhere, and WE are not going away.

Thanks, very valuable

Know your enemy.


Thanks for the excellent roundup. What is perhaps most striking is that almost every headline uses some variation of the term "conspiracy theory". 911 has indeed become a "sacred myth", with heretics labeled "conspiracy theorists".

I don't have the stomach to read through them all. Did ANY of the articles shed ANY new light on the events? Or is it just the usual pop psychology, ad hominem attacks and straw man fallacies dressed up as journalism?

Perhaps the mods can front page this so we can get some more feedback.

this one about the Dallas group...

From JFK To Sept. 11, Conspiracy Theories Thrive
by The Associated Press

linked to "911truth.org"

and was reposted at over 100.000 locations.

I don't have the stomach to look at the others but I assume many of them are what we have become accustomed to which is superficially a "hit piece" but instead a cloaked attempt to spread the TRUTH.

...and that Associated Press article led to more local Press

A reporter for the Dallas Observer read the above Associated Press article ( http://interceder.net/topic/Ted-Walter ) in a New Zealand publication. It led to this local Dallas article (which was not a hit piece).

This local Dallas area University of Texas at Arlington student newspaper actually subtly promoted AE911Truth with this article (which probably embarrasses their large School of Architecture) http://www.theshorthorn.com/index.php/entertainment/todo/27721-two-groups-for-911-explore-the-destruction-and-collapse-of-...

And I think that we have another reporter waiting for the right time to do some positive "online videos".
We are staying in touch.

One more for your list

Ted Rall chimes in with some typical nonsense.


Paul Craig Roberts appears in the comments section and makes short work of Rall's claims. Roberts also has his own article published on the website, right next to Ted's.

Does 9/11 Truth Have A Chance?


From the Roberts article

'Without an independent media, which the US no longer has, people are taught that only “conspiracy kooks” challenge the government’s story. Even on the Internet, this is a main theme on Antiwar.com and on CounterPunch.org, two sites that protest America’s wars but accept the 9/11 propaganda that justifies the wars.'

How to be to the point, PCR! That statement right there is golden all by itself in my book.

The doggy-bag.

Awesome Cosmos,

It's a dirty job, but some had to do it. Thanks for putting this together

All credit goes to Julian

He put this piece together.

It really was a dirty job, I personally wouldn't be able to stomach it.

Yes, thanks Julian


Julian - Thanks

Julian - Thanks