Thomas Kean: "aftershocks" from planes caused collapse of WTC Building 7

WeAreChange confronts Thomas Kean For The 3rd Time

Thomas Kean: “aftershocks” from planes caused collapse of WTC Building 7

On September 13th, 2011, Thomas Kean, Chair of the 9/11 Commission and Former Governor of N.J., gave a lecture for the The Drew Forum, a series of public lectures at Drew University located in Madison, New jersey. We Are Change was tipped off to the event by and attended. After the lecture, a question and answer session was opened up to the audience. When We Are Change asked Thomas Kean to address the collapse of WTC Building 7, which was not hit by a plane, and was not mentioned once in the 9/11 Commission Report, his answer was simply shocking.

Kean claims the Bureau of Standards Final Report on the collapse WTC Building 7 found that “aftershocks”
from the planes hitting the twin towers caused the foundation of Building 7 to weaken and collapse. First, it is important to note that the National Bureau of Standards changed its name back in 1988 to the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or NIST. Second, no where in NIST’s Final Report does it say that aftershocks from the impact of the planes into the Twin Towers caused or even had a factor in the collapse of Building 7. In fact, NIST claims Building 7 was brought down by fire.

However, NIST’s Final Report has come under harsh criticism from highly reputable sources. A recent documentary released by Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, which you can watch for free right now (, details meticulously the flaws and illogical conclusions brought forward by NIST.

How is it that the Chair of the most important criminal investigation of our lives doesn’t even know the official government story behind the collapse of Building 7? Furthermore, why does he make up a theory that is more illogical and more preposterous than the official version released by NIST, essentially baking a layer cake of lies? I think it’s time for a REAL 9/11 investigation.

WeAreChange confronts Thomas Kean For The 3rd Time


Who is Thomas Kean?

Donald Rumsfeld was also questioned about WTC 7, the building that came down without any plane hitting it. His answer was also shocking. From the Mancow Muller Show courtesy of Corbett Report.

Almost comedic...

All I can say is WTF? Kean's credibility, alongside the entire 9/11 Commission, is already toast. How is it that someone who was entrusted with co-chairing the investigation (?/!!) into the worst crime on American soil in modern history can spew forth such utterly asinine statements like that?

Even if he was trying *deliberately* to discredit himself and the "Commission", he couldn't have done any worse that this! Or perhaps he was caught off-guard and totally screwed-up? Whichever way... this is still unbelievable, almost to the point of comedy.


Kean's performance here shows these fascists have absolutely no respect for anyone so they don't need to tell the truth or even say anything logical or fact based. They enjoy lying. They also don't care if they endanger their families with their dopey plans - they're pure and simply ruthless crooks.

lying con man just making shit up


9/11 Truth for the win!

Great job Luke.

A New Answer Up the Flagpole

The perpetraitors of 9/11 know that time isn't on their side. The weight of the evidence is growing and so are the number of people paying attention. Kean used a relatively quiet occasion to try out a new explanation of the collapse of Building 7 to see if it would fly. The audaciousness of this effort suggests that he is well aware of who actually destroyed the WTC and their potential peril. It also suggests that the organized effort behind 9/11 is alive and well.

Best and Brightest?

He can't even get the script right. One thing I have noticed is that ideologues are usually a generation or two out of sync on their info. An example of this is like when people call OWS protesters "hippies" which fell by the wayside when unions got evolved.

Kean's 9/11 Commision was a Kangaroo court

Kangaroo court: a mock court in which the principles of law and justice are disregarded or perverted.

I suppose that makes Kean and Hamilton co-Captains Kangaroo.

When all this finally unravels these two individuals in particular must be held accountable for their dereliction of duties.

Establishment is Using Surrealism Strategy

"Alice laughed: "There's no use trying," she said; "one can't believe impossible things."

"I daresay you haven't had much practice," said the Queen. "When I was younger, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."

from Alice in Wonderland

Since the irrefutable facts of 9/11 demolish both Mr. Kean's absurd explanations, as well as those of NIST (both equally absurd), it seems the establishment now sees fit to just throw out one absurd theory after another. The subliminal message is this: THEY DO NOT WANT TO, AND DO NOT FEEL THEY HAVE TO, ENGAGE IN A SERIOUS FACTUAL DISCUSSION, and would rather engage in surreal arguments to discourage the 9/11 truth movement. The message is this: we don't care if you have all the facts on your side, we choose to ignore reality, because we have the power to do so, and can get away with it.

"Poor Alice, when she was just small...." The Jefferson Airplane

Nervous Joking...

You know how nervous people, that just aren't clever, make jokes and then say: "no?" Like: "this Kean guy isn't very Keen, no," or "I'm not too Kean on this guy, no." Well when building 7 fell it was like that in my head. I was like: "Maybe the retaining wall was compromised and all the water from the Hudson just washed out the foundation, no." "Maybe all the pounding from adjacent buildings took a toll on it, no." Then: "wait, this doesn't make any sense, no." Then the weird thing was that all incredulity just vanished.

Hold on a minute

Is it possible Kean is telling the truth?

Could he be revealing that there were devices planted in WTC7 (and others) that were timed to do damage as the planes struck WTC1 and 2?

Many people describe separate events. Maintenance and construction workers in WTC1 described events well away from the planes, so why not WTC7?

Barry Jennings described an event in the WTC7 6th floor stairwell that many believe is not associated with a building collapse.

A WTC7 building engineer, Mike Catalano, describes being in a sound proof room near the top of WTC7 when the plane hit the North tower. He said he "Felt the building shake and move a little. Thought it was a bomb" (page 1)

Unfortunately, Kean's subordinates who typed up Catalano's statements failed to include the parts about the bomb and building shaking. (page 2)

Maybe this oversight was due to one of the Bureau of Standards (NIST's) engineers sitting in on the interview. (William Grosshandler)

See the "soundproof room" and "big bomb" referenced in this second set of notes: (page 2)

(Note: Ed Campbell is not the guy being interviewed, yet another error by Kean's crack team of investigators) [Or is this subliminal whistle blowing??]

Perhaps Kean is starting to slip up and can't remember the official story any longer. We can hope.

Keep up the good work.

Kean Friendly With Neo-Con Figures

Recently saw a Russia Today segment about the Bohemian Grove, in which a photo from the 1999 event (just 2 years before 9/11) was presented showing Dick Cheney, Colin Powell and Thomas Kean (and possibly Rumsfeld if memory serves) sitting together sharing a joke. The perps and a gate-keeper just before the big event. Nothing to see here.

Hamilton has his own baggage. And then there is Zelikow.

Memory serves you right.

Good memory.

Rumy was there. And so were others, but you got the most important ones.

I was in that RT segment...Other pictures from that day (not included in the RT piece) included a pic of Kissinger and Thomas Kean, Newt Gingrich and Kissinger's son, David all hanging out together. The year on the photos was 1999.

In that case

This all conforms to my basic idea of Kean's background. But in view of that, I find it puzzling that he and Hamiton would go 'off message' with their 'set up to fail' remarks. One would think that, being isiders, they would know not to go off message by saying things like that. One would expect that they would maintain a facade of being satisfied that all questions that needed answering were answered.

Of course I'm not suggesting that they were insiders regarding the plot itself, and no doubt there are things about 9/11 that they are not privy to and are genuinely curious about. But I'm still surprised that they wouldn't have known to keep such concerns to themselves, the better to serve their friends.

He's also part of another group of insiders.

The Pilgrims Society, founded in 1902, is a British-American society established, in the words of American diplomat Joseph Choate, 'to promote good-will, good-fellowship, and everlasting peace between the United States and Great Britain'. Over the years it has boasted an elite membership of politicians, diplomats, businessmen, and writers have included Henry Kissinger, Casper Weinberger, Douglas Fairbanks Jr., Henry Luce, Alexander Haig, Paul Volcker, Tom Kean and Walter Cronkite to mention a very few. It is notable for holding dinners to welcome into office each successive U.S. Ambassador to the United Kingdom. The patron of the society is Queen Elizabeth II.

Keep in mind

that the port authority of NY/NJ has a Giant hand in 911.

This local gov agency initiated the plan to claim 20 acres in downtown NY for the towers & use taxes or tax-breaks to pay for some of it..

David Rockefeller is said to have worked with them on this.. (& The towers land was actually taken from local people thru Eminent Domain)

Scam from the get-go.

The port authority is controlled by the Gov. of NY & NJ.. Hello Tommy Kean.

It amazes me that this angle in the compex story of 911 is never fully explained.


These guys are born liars.

Its been 10 years. And they are confident of getting away with what they have done. I wonder what it will take to tip the scales and get them to realize that they will not.

The precedent is the Kennedy assassinations. They got away with that for decades. Guess in their play-book 911 is the same.
It is confidence in killing and lying and building an empire and amassing personal wealth. They are confident in their lies because no one has come close to being held accountable and being justly punished. They are confident because they are getting rich skimming off the military industrial complex's extravagances thanks to 911.

As long as they have nothing to fear - they will keep lying, keep killing.

Next Target - Iran. Apparently Iran now is responsible in participating in 911.

With the NDAA, soon enough they will be declaring war on the American people- labelled as domestic terrorists.

As long as there is a tidy profit to be made from the "New Security Industries" thanks to 911, this will go on.

I wonder what it will take to stop them. It has been 10 years.