Attend a Presidential Campaign Speech Q&A to Put AE911Truth Question in the Spotlight
Written by AE911Truth
What began in Iowa on Tuesday, January 3, 2012 and will continue to June 26 is an American tradition that AE911Truth needs you to participate in. Americans will be heading to their caucuses and primaries to select their preferred Presidential candidate. There are currently many Republican candidates traversing states and making local appearances in small venues. This gives you, the supporters of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a unique accessible opportunity to interact with the candidates and to make a simple statement or ask a simple question to educate and pin them down on the issue of a new investigation and have them state their stance – publicly, and ideally in front of the media. You can find the candidate’s web-sites to see where they will be meeting voters near you.
Because it is important to engage the candidate and the other people in attendance with as much finesse as possible, we suggest:
Option 1: (A statement)
This statement is fairly concise yet includes the important detail that we are not alone in our call for a real investigation. By not asking a specific question, and thereby not eliciting a response, it may very well have more impact during the awkward moment following with the audience, media, and the candidate himself.
[Senator/Governor/Representative or other appropriate title] ___________:
Many 9/11 victims family members have called for a real investigation into the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and high-rise Building 7. Even Bob Graham, Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has called for further investigation into the 9/11 attacks. Several of the 9/11 Commissioners cast doubts on their own report, complaining of a lack of cooperation by the Bush Administration and outright lies from top military officers. One Commissioner resigned in protest, refusing to be part of another government whitewash, which he later termed a “national scandal.”
Numerous 9/11 family members support the 1,600 Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth who are demanding a new investigation into the explosive destruction of the three high-rises.
We look forward to your support with this vital American issue when you become president.
OPTION 2: (A question)
[Senator/Governor/Representative or other appropriate title] _________:
I have a question about your commitment to openness and transparency of the governmental process that we Americans have come to expect.
More than 1600 independent architects and engineers are calling for a real investigation of the destruction of the World Trade Center twin towers and the lesser-known Building 7 on 9/11. They are demanding scientifically valid engineering and criminal investigations into these events. It’s inexcusable that no such investigations have yet occurred. NIST also admitted that Building 7 experienced freefall, which rules out fire as the explanation. The 1600 architects and engineers cite overwhelming evidence of explosive controlled demolition – and they are backed by 9/11 victims' family members.
When you are elected President will you do the right thing and actively support a real investigation that examines the evidence at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth at AE911Truth.org?
Because the typical response to someone questioning 9/11 is either a non-response, or a dismissal by saying “that question is an insult to the American People,” “That question doesn’t deserve an answer,” etc. we need to frame the question carefully and stick to the facts. Don't try to engage in other public back and forth about any other 9/11 issues except to get a “Yes” from the candidate. Don’t stop until you get a “Yes” or a “No.” If you get a “No” then it would be appropriate to ask:
“Does that mean that you do not support an open and transparent government for the American People where government engineers must base their reports on science and physics?”
After your public question, make whatever materials you have available for distribution to others. Bring copies of the 9/11: Blueprint for Truth DVDs or the 15-minute mini-DVD documentary on WTC 7 with Ed Asner, the street brochure, the 9/11 Investigator newspaper. Hand them out to those who heard your question and are curious – and of course the candidate too.
Print out the above and practice reading it out loud. Please try to have an associate or friend with you in order to record your statement on video. You never know when one of these candidates is going to actually voice support for a new investigation. Even their denials are important to document. We will post the results on our website. Please use our Contact Us page to send us your results and any feedback.
Thank you for taking action.
Congressional Outreach Team
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Primary/Caucus Calendar — Republican Party
|January 3, 2012||Iowa (caucus)|
|January 10, 2012||New Hampshire (primary)|
|January 21, 2012||South Carolina (primary)|
|January 31, 2012||Florida (primary)|
|February 4, 2012||Nevada (caucus)|
|February 4-11, 2012||Maine (caucus)|
|February 7, 2012||Colorado (caucus)|
|Missouri (primary) *see note below|
|February 28, 2012||Arizona (primary)|
|March 3, 2012||Washington (caucus)|
|March 6, 2012||Alaska (caucus)|
|(Super Tuesday)||Georgia (primary)|
|North Dakota (caucus)|
|March 6-10, 2012||Wyoming (caucus)|
|March 10, 2012||Kansas (caucus)|
|U.S. Virgin Islands (caucus)|
|March 13, 2012||Alabama (primary)|
|March 17, 2012||Missouri (GOP caucus) *see note below|
|March 20, 2012||Illinois (primary)|
|March 24, 2012||Louisiana (primary)|
|April 3, 2012||District of Columbia (primary)|
|April 24, 2012||Connecticut (primary)|
|New York (primary)|
|Rhode Island (primary)|
|May 8, 2012||Indiana (primary)|
|North Carolina (primary)|
|West Virginia (primary)|
|May 15, 2012||Nebraska (primary)|
|May 22, 2012||Arkansas (primary)|
|June 5, 2012||California (primary)|
|New Jersey (primary)|
|New Mexico (primary)|
|South Dakota (primary)|
|June 26, 2012||Utah (primary)|