Former CNN Reporter Greg Hunter takes on 9/11

9/11 Conspiracy Theory–Insane or Insightful?
By Greg Hunter
April 10, 2012

I keep coming back to one question in the 9/11 conspiracy story: How did two jets knock down three New York City skyscrapers? The jets only hit two buildings, and that is a fact. I have posted a video from the group “RememberBuilding7.org” on the USAWatchdog.com site. (Click here to see Building 7 implode.) It clearly shows Building 7 of the World Trade Center imploding straight down, as if it was a controlled demolition. I am not an expert, but it sure looks like that to me. I, also, ran across this video from Corbettreport.com that summarizes the entire 9/11 conspiracy in less than 5 minutes. It was done on the 9/11 ten year anniversary. I found it very well done and factually spot on, although it goes by fast, so you must watch closely. Give it a look for yourself. Do you think the 9/11 conspiracy theory is insane or insightful?—Greg Hunter.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98 (Over 1,286,000 Views)

Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com is neither Democrat nor Republican, Liberal or Conservative. Before creating and producing the site, Greg spent nearly 9 years as a network and investigative correspondent. He worked for ABC News and Good Morning America for nearly 6 years. Most recently, Greg worked for CNN for shows such as Paula Zahn Now, American Morning and various CNN business shows.

http://usawatchdog.com/bio/

Greg Hunter, a man of integity, credibility and intelligence, used to report for the mainstream corporate owned media. But then he made the mistake of reporting the truth about depleted uranium weapons and the economy. I have long admired his accurate, truthful reporting. Now I'm thrilled to see that he has openly addressed the topic of 9-11-01. Thank you for your honesty, integrity, and courage, Greg. We need the truth now more than ever.

http://usawatchdog.com/is-the-911-conspiracy-theory-insane-or-insightful/#comment-92356

Well done, Greg Hunter.

Thank you, Greg Hunter! Now if only the rest of the talking heads in the cowardly corporate media could show the same degree of spine, we might make some headway in solving this once and for all.

It is the treasonous, yellow-livered mainstream media which is essentially obstructing the course of justice by denying Americans the facts, and simultaneously maintaining the wall which allows the planners and perpetrators of the attacks to remain free, to strike again at a time of their choosing.

Except that

Except that in 'denying Americans the facts, and simultaneously maintaining the wall which allows the planners and perpetrators of the attacks to remain free, to strike again at a time of their choosing,' the mainstream media are simply fulfilling their role as the propaganda arm of the ruling elites. It isn't that they're yellow-livered; it's simply the nature of the beast. Let there be no misunderstanding of this basic point. It isn't simply that they are dependent on corporate interests; they ARE the corporate interests.

It's the so-called 'alternative' media, with all their posturing and pretense about being 'free' and 'open' and 'independent' and 'courageous' and unafraid to 'tell it like it is' who have been guilty of appalling gutlessness where 9/11 is concerned (not to mention other cases of terrorism, e.g., anthrax, the London bombings, etc., where they've done little to expose discrepancies in the official accounts).

I love it

when another person with intelligence AND conscience speaks out. The comments on the site are overwhelmingly in our favor.

Thank you Greg Hunter!

Who is next?

Over 150+ comments and counting

I can't say for sure, but I don't think Mr. Hunter gets a 150+ comments on a month's worth of stories, not from what I've seen. Mostly all are pro truth. The comments that support the OCT are quite indicative of how desperate they must be. It is amazing what they'll come up with to ease their own minds. A Mr. Orling for example provides a very detailed description of exactly how WTC 7 collapsed including the 100 ft of freefall. His, as well as other "defender", explanation still includes burning diesel fuel, building damage, and other factors which were refuted by or never appeared in the final report Honestly, I think they just make this stuff up. It's kind of funny in a way, often it is we who get accused of not facing "facts" that don't support our point of view. Here, defenders (for lack of better term) have a report to support their position, as poor as it is, yet they still make up their own with just as little evidence as the first. I suppose this exposes their own lack of confidence in the NIST report. The response to these are commendable. No tearing down, no condescending remarks, or insults. Just simple refutation with facts. Good job to all.

Next we'll have to wait and see if Mr. Hunter takes his curiosity and investigates further. We'll know how sincere he is at getting all the facts.

peace everyone.
dtg

Nailed it...

Thanks dtg!

Wow

The importance and impact of this article and the seriousness and credibility of its author can not be ignored. Bravo, Greg, for your courage in asking these difficult questions. Thank you.

A Sneaking Suspicion

I bet many journalists and reporters have a sneaking suspicion regarding 9/11. Those in the media feign outrage over the idea of 9/11 conspiracy mongering while at the same time they are afraid to look into it much believing it could be true.

A Sneaking Suspicion

They are afraid to look at what really happened on that day. Sure the truth hurts but the truth will set all of us free from this rotten Government we live under. It's just amazing that more people don't see it. Bunch of brain washed sheep in my opinion.

A Challenge to do MORE

I posted this comment on Greg's site. Do you agree? If you do, please post a comment here--- and there. If not, please explain.

http://usawatchdog.com/is-the-911-conspiracy-theory-insane-or-insightful/

Come on, Greg!

Please do something more than post articles. Your connections at CNN could be an invaluable tool for connecting the dots so many of us have assembled.

Once a few of them begin to connect the rest will follow.

Can you verify the camera position and direction of the low-flier in the CNN video of evacuation at the WH on 9/11? A two minute phone call to/from the videographer would be enough. An opportunity to review CNN video archives would be an extraordinary benefit to 9/11 research.