OKC Bombing Star Witness Reveals Staged Government Terror Attack
Joe Thu, 04/19/2012 - 9:23pm
OKC Bombing Star Witness Reveals Staged Government Terror Attack
http://www.infowars.com/okc-bombing-star-witness-reveals-staged-government-terror-attack/
Alex talks with Jane Graham and James Lane about the OK City bombing. Graham is a surveyor of that attack and Lane is the producer and director of A Noble Lie: Oklahoma City 1995, a documentary available at the Infowars Store.
- Joe's blog
- Login to post comments
Survivor, right?
'a surveyor of that attack...'
A suppose she could also be a 'surveyor' of the attack in some sense, but didn't you mean 'survivor'?
She was in the building
on the seventh floor. There were others too.
Edit
And I know I meant 'I suppose...' and not 'A suppose...' (Is the Edit function for one's comments no longer available here now?)
Edit
Edit does not work after someone replies to a comment.
Thanks
Thanks. Now I understand.
This was a very good interview.
Excellent witness testimony!
The "Patriot" Act connection
This is a most important interview; every American should see this. It is 100% clear that the reality of the OKC attack was an entirely different ball of wax than what was sold to the public.
Possibly speculative on my part here, but in 1995, Senator Joe Biden, the current Vice President, drafted the core of what was to become the (sic) USA PATRIOT Act. Then entitled the "Omnibus Anti Terrorism Bill of 1995", the parts that echo the Patriot Act are as follows.
It would:
(a). authorize the Justice Department to pick and choose crimes to investigate and prosecute based on political beliefs and associations;
(b). repeal the ancient provision (Posse Comitatus) barring the U.S. military from civilian law enforcement;
(c). expand a pre-trial detention scheme that puts the burden of proof on the accused;
(d). loosen the carefully-crafted rules governing federal wiretaps, in violation of the Fourth Amendment;
(e). establish special courts that would use secret evidence to order the deportation of persons convicted of no crimes, in violation of basic principles of due process;
(f). permit permanent detention by the Attorney General of aliens convicted of no crimes, with no judicial review;
(g). give the President unreviewable power to criminalize fund-raising for lawful activities associated with unpopular causes;
(h). renege on the Administration’s approval in the last Congress of a provision to insure that the FBI would not investigate based on First Amendment activities; and
(i). resurrect the discredited ideological visa denial provisions of the McCarran Walter Act to bar foreign speakers.
*
One might wonder why Joe Biden would make such time and effort to draft such extremist legislation, when terrorism in the United States was at the time such a rare event? From whom did he get encouragement to undertake this work? Furthermore, the chances of getting such draconian, Constitution-busting legislation through Congress, without any reason to justify it, seems peculiar at the very least.
When asked about this, Biden claimed that this pending legislation was in response to the Oklahoma City bombing. However, the bill was introduced into Congress on February 10, 1995, nearly two and a half months *prior* to the OKC bombing, which was on April 19, 2005. Biden lied.
Obviously, this bill eventually never made it to the president's desk - for whatever reason. Perhaps it raised too many red flags amongst lawmakers? Perhaps it was deemed as being too extreme and paranoid, and as such OKC was not enough of a "shock and awe" event to galvanize the public into voluntarily giving up on their rights so easily?
Don't you just love Joe Biden!!
I was talking to a few 911 Truth Activists last night. It was brought up that we (the US) will NEVER really investigate 9/11 so why push to open people's minds to the truth. I concurred saying that there is is remote possibility of some international investigation but that we should still use 9/11 as an entry point into the total deception that is taking place. And that about all we can do is to increase awareness of of our situation and thus grow the global mind attending to a solution. I stated that I had never met anyone who regretted having their blinders removed.
Money for clean government......
I was just asked by the State of Arizona to contribute five dollars on my tax return to promote "clean government," gee, I didn't know there was otherwise. Everyone needs to wake up! If the State is admitting tacitly that the government is dirty then why the hell can't people glom onto that?
Remember: "would you by a used car from this guy?" Seems we did and millions died because of it. But that's OK we had government reform, didn't we? You really don't need people to see the elephant in the room when all you have to do is point out the *#$t. That was the message I got from the State of Arizona, anyway. Ironically my five dollars will probably go to the likes of McCain
but the message is still out there: government is dirty.
News reports that day
This is a great primer for anyone who hasn't seen the news reports. 3 explosive devices found.
The Murrah Building was slated for total destruction
It is clear that the destruction of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in OKC did not work out as intended. It is statistically highly unlikely that all of those numerous media accounts of at least THREE bombs, including video clearly showing bomb disposal units, equipment and personnel being moved into the area, were all inaccurate. Also, there were never any "corrections" or rebuttals as regards the multiple bomb reports as the case progressed... the media just quietly dropped this (incendiary) part of the evidence, as if it never even existed... just like what happened in the October 2001 anthrax case (on discovery that Muslims were not responsible), or on 9/11, as regards Building 7 (and so much other stuff in the *original* raw media reportage). Once they "got" McVeigh, that was it... the story morphed into "a single ANFO truck bomb, one bomber and one accomplice".
The original likely intent with OKC was (IMHO), for all the explosive devices to have detonated simultaneously. This would have destroyed the whole building ... ie nothing left but rubble and steel, and undoubtedly killed all 550 (approximately) employees, and a number of people in the vicinity. The planners appeared to have aimed for 500+ dead. They could still blame a truck bomber, but add C4 and military grade explosives to the ANFO scenario... (McVeigh was ex army, so that would have been a plausible explanation).
Again, its speculation time, but this might have been the threshold of casualties which would have angered and incensed Congress (and the public at large) enough to have permitted Joe Biden's Omnibus Antiterrorism Bill (February 1995) to pass through Congress and be signed into law by President Clinton. (see post above).
Coincidentally - in the video with Jane, it is revealed that the father of the person - Andreas Strassmeir - who is implicated in playing a prominent role in the bombings, is a friend of the Clintons.
Just my 2.718 cents.
More evidence
of what Ralph Nader calls the two party dictatorship. The complexity of the 9/11 false flag certainly requires that the planing began in the Clinton years, or earlier.
What if all the explosives had exploded?
I am wondering what the cover story would have been had all the explosives actually exploded. If the entire building had been destroyed, how would they have explained it? Was it intended that all the explosives should have exploded, but something went wrong? Could they have gotten away with claiming the one truck bomb caused the entire building to collapse? That seems like it would be a hard sell, but given the official 9/11 lies they got away with, maybe not.
Or perhaps the plan was to implicate others in the OKC bombing, with more truck bombs all around the building to act as triggers to set off the internally placed explosives. But then the plans fell apart, and they lost track of their patsies, and they were forced to pin the partial destruction on McVeigh. I read somewhere that there were a couple mideastern-looking people they were trying to find.
DoD memo confirms bombs
Great find!
Excellent find there. This evidence was obviously barred from the McVeigh's court hearing by Justice Matsch - it would have really messed up their lone bomber scenario. The FBI obviously knew the score re. three bombs, but they covered it up as well. (And according to witnesses in the Murrah Building, there was an explosion inside the building *before* the truck bomb exploded in the street outside).
It would have been a tough call linking Timothy McVeigh with *at least two more bombs*, as the only person involved in setting, wiring and firing the explosives... and Terry Nichols was in Kansas on the morning of the attack.
!!!!!!!!
-
Source?
Can this memo be traced to any reliable, verifiable source? If not, I think we should play it safe and assume that it may be a forgery. Once the source is located and can be reliably confirmed, then represent it as evidence.
Here's where I found it.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/bombs/bombs.html
Here's where I found the DoD Atlantic Command Memo, (3rd one.) I can't say 100% that it's genuine, although the contents are in line with the early media reports. Also there's a FEMA situation report that says essentially the same thing.
It can also be found as a link at: http://www.okcbombingtruth.com
But I hear ya, Wildbear. I wonder if these documents could be obtained via FOIA independently? The affidavits have apparently been verified with the people who gave them.
Hoppy Heidelberg
OKC Bombing Grand Juror Hoppy Heidelberg Passes
http://www.infowars.com/okc-bombing-grand-juror-hoppy-heidelberg-passes/