Research/Evidence Expert Panel Reports False Accounts of US Political and Military Leaders on 9/11-Tuesday, June 5 2012

Tuesday, June 5 2012 - Research/Evidence
Expert Panel Reports False Accounts of US Political and Military Leaders on 9/11

June 5, 2012
The 9/11 Consensus Panel

Massive National War Games on September 11th Raise Further Questions

NEW YORK, June 5, 2012 — New evidence shows that the September 11th activities of former President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld were falsely reported by official sources.

The 20-member 9/11 Consensus Panel analyzed evidence from press reports, FOIA requests, and archived 9/11 Commission file documents to produce eight new studies, released today.

The international Panel also discovered that four massive aerial practice exercises traditionally held in October were in full operation on 9/11. The largest, Global Guardian, held annually by NORAD and the US Strategic and Space Commands, had originally been scheduled for October 22-31 but was moved, along with Vigilant Guardian, to early September.

Although senior officials claimed no one could have predicted using hijacked planes as weapons, the military had been practicing similar exercises on 9/11 itself -- and for years before it.

The Panel, discovering widespread reports of confusion and delays in the defense response, looked into who was overseeing the air defenses after the second Tower was hit at 9:03 AM.

Official sources claimed neither Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Joint Chiefs of Staff Acting Chairman General Richard Myers (filling in for General Hugh Shelton), nor war-room chief General Montague Winfield were available to take command until well after the Pentagon was struck about 9:37.

Yet emerging documents and memoirs show that top leaders were engaged earlier -- and later discussed a shootdown of the “let's roll” Flight 93 before debris was scattered widely around its alleged Shanksville, Pennsylvania crash site.

Most intriguing is the mystery of who was running the Pentagon's war-room during the critical early hours.

These findings follow hard on the Kuala Lumpur Tribunal's May 15th verdict that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld were guilty of torture and war crimes.

The Consensus Panel has completed 25 educational studies (using a medical consensus model) offering the "best evidence" regarding specific official claims about 9/11.

Its goal is to “provide a ready source of evidence-based research to any investigation that may be undertaken by the public, the media, academia, or any other investigative body or institution.”

The website is being translated into French, Spanish, and other languages.

Media contacts for US, Canada, Europe:

Consensus 9/11 Panel Members and Administration

Consensus 9/11 Panel Members and Administration

Panel Members

Dr. Robert Bowman, former head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering at the US Air Force Institute of Technology, and the Director of Advanced Space Programs Development (“Star Wars”) under Presidents Ford and Carter.

David S. Chandler, BS in IPS (physics/engineering), Harvey Mudd College; MS in mathematics, California Polytechnic University; high school and junior college physics and math educator; formerly on editorial board of The Physics Teacher (AAPT journal); in 2008, played a central role in forcing NIST to concede that WTC 7 experienced a significant period of free fall.

Giulietto Chiesa, Italian journalist serving 19 years as Moscow correspondent; former member of the European Parliament; Fellow of the Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies; produced Zero, a documentary film about 9/11.

Dwain Deets, former Director for Research Engineering and Aerosp ace Projects at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center; received the NASA Exceptional Service Award and inclusion in “Who’s Who in Science and Engineering.”

Tod Fletcher, M.A., C.Phil., Geography, U.C. Berkeley; former geography and environmental science instructor at Berkeley, San Francisco State and Laney College; in 2010 and 2011 was host of the weekly internet radio show “9/11 In Context.”

Lt. Col. David Gapp, U.S. Air Force retired pilot with 3000 flying hours; qualified aircraft accident investigator; former President, Aircraft Accident Board; Chief of the Air Force’s Theatre Security Cooperation programs for all of Central and South America; 31 years in the USAF.

Dr. Niels Harrit, Associate Professor of Chemistry at the Nano-Science Center, University of Copenhagen; first author of “Active Thermitic Material Observed in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe,” published in the Open Chemical Physics Journal in 2009.

Dr. Steven E. Jones, former Professor of Physics at Brigham Young University; initiator of the research for the peer-reviewed paper, “Active Thermitic Material Observed in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe,” published in the Open Chemical Physics Journal.

Commander Ralph Kolstad, is a retired US Navy fighter pilot, and for 27 years was an airline pilot for two major carriers, with 3,000 hours total flying time.

Dr. Graeme MacQueen, Associate Professor (retired) in the Department of Religious Studies at McMaster University in Canada and former Director of McMaster’s Centre for Peace Studies. His 9/11 research includes four peer-reviewed articles. He served on the Steering Committee of the International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 held in Toronto in September, 2011.

Massimo Mazzucco, award-winning filmmaker, screenwriter, and journalist. Editor of, dedicated to 9/11 resea rch. His 2006 9/11 documentary “Inganno Globale” was broa dcast on Italian TV (Berlusconi’s Canale 5), sparking a national debate. His documentary “The New American Century” appeared in film festivals worldwide. Mazzucco is currently preparing his third documentary, which will rebut the counter-claims against the 9/11 Movement.

Dennis P. McMahon, JD from Western New England Law School, LLM from NYU. A member of the New York and Massachusetts bars, he in 2009 served as attorney for 9/11 family members in Burke v McSweeney, as part of the NYCCAN petition effort to have NYC voters decide whether New York City should have its own 9/11 investigation. He was instrumental in introducing the “Building What?” campaign, later rebranded as “Remember Building 7.”

Aidan Monaghan holds a Bachelor’s degree in electronic engineering and researches Freedom of Information (FOI) records regarding the 9/11 attacks. Government 9/11 records obtained by Monaghan have been reported by the Beacon News Online of the Sun-Times News Group, KLAV AM in Las Vegas, NV, the documentary “Loose Change: An American Coup” and several books. His 9/11 research includes two peer reviewed studies.

Rowland Morgan, with a Cambridge Honors Degree and a teaching certificate, is an independent journalist and the co-author of 9/11 Revealed. In the 1990s he was a weekly columnist in London, for the Independent on Sunday and the Guardian. He also co-authored, with Ian Henshall, Flight 93 Revealed (Carol and Graf, 2006).

Frances Shure is a retired business owner, a Licensed Professional Counselor specializing in depth psychology, and an adjunct instructor at Naropa University. She has long been a peace and environmental activist, is co-founder of Colorado 9/11 Visibility, and is listed with Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth.

Lou Stolzenberg is a retired Physical Therapist (BS, University of Wisco nsin, Madison, 1974). Her 26-year career, using evidence-based patient care, combined with her faith and he r concern for social justice, drew her to 9/11 Truth activism in 2006. She is Coordinator for Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth (

Daniel Sunjata, American actor in film, television and theater; performed in a Tony award-winning Broadway play, “Tak e Me Out;” also featured in the TV series Rescue Me, where a sub-plot has included 9/11 as a false-flag operation; more recently featured in ABC’s “Grey’s Anatomy.”

Dr. Matthew Witt is Associate Professor of Public Administration at the University of La Verne, CA. He has published work, since 2008, with Lance deHaven-Smith and other scholars, showing that shadow governing entities and state crimes against democracy undermine U.S. governing legitimacy and the US founding doctrine. This work appears in Administration & Society, American Behavioral Scientist, and Public Integrity.

Dr. Jonathan B. Weisbuch (M.D.,M.P.H.), formerly Chief Health Officer, Maricopa County, AZ; Medical Director, LA County Dept. of Health Services; Director, Department of Health and Social Services, Wyoming; President of the American Association of Public Health Physicians (AAPHP); editorial consultant, American Journal of Public Health. Author of over 40 academic articles.

Administration of the 9/11 Consensus Panel

Co-founder of the 9/11 Consensus Panel Dr. David Ray Griffin: Emeritus professor of philosophy of religion and theology at Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Graduate University; has published 37 books, mostly in the philosophy of science and religion, but ten are about 9/11. The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé, was named “Pick of the Week” by Publishers Weekly in November 2008; he was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for his 9/11 work in both 2008 and 2009, and he was named one of “The 50 People Who Matter Today” by the New Statesman in 2009.

Mr. William Veale, attorney; graduated from University of Maryland L aw School. Instructor of Criminal Trial Practice for 11 years at B oalt Hall School of Law, Berkeley; former Chief Assistant Public Defender, Contra Costa County, CA, where he had a 31-year career. Has worked for several years, through court appearances and his Vealetruth blog, to expose the facts about 9/11. He is serving pro bono as the legal spokesperson for the 9/11 Consensus Panel, as well as serving as a voting Panelist. 

Elizabeth Woodworth, retired health sciences librarian and author of “’What Can I Do?’ Citizen Strategies for Nuclear Disarmament,” which was carried by UN bookstores, has been researching 9/11 evidence, editing books, and writing articles on the topic since 2006. She is co-founder and Coordinator of the 9/11 Consensus Panel.

!! Excellent CONSENSUS-POINTS !!

Truth Jihad 06-08-2012

(Note: I sent this letter to media contacts , Barrett, Zwicker, and Zarembka this morning 06-09-2012. I'm correcting some typos for this presentation.)

Mr. Fletcher, at around 65:00 you talk about examining others with careful scrutiny. These 2 statements beneath together are clearly double-talk:

The purpose of the 9/11 Consensus Panel is to provide the world with a clear statement, based on expert independent opinion, of some of the best evidence opposing the official narrative about 9/11.


The Panel uses the term in the very narrow sense of the “best evidence” available with regard to any specific claim of the 9/11 official story that the Panel challenges. It does not mean the strongest evidence against the official story in general. It is simply the best evidence against each particular claim that the Panel addresses.

There are a few reasons I can think of to use double-talk in this situation. None of them reflect positively on your effort, sir.

Mr. Barrett, it's great to love people and support them and have hopes for them, but you must see the truth of their actions as well.

And regarding this beneath:

[QUOTING 06-09-2012]
Specialty: Information Quality, Ethics, and Dynamics
Name: Elizabeth Woodworth, Writer, Librarian; Canada
Phone: 250-383-2417 (landline); 250-889-4559 (cell)

Ms. Woodworth, ethics of what? What ethics?