New 9/11 truth documentary among "most watched" on PBS this week

By Victoria N. Alexander
Sep 3, 2012

"9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" is getting public attention and casting doubt on the scientific validity of the U.S. government's investigation into the WTC tragedy. PBS is the first major network to air the program.

Just days away from the 11th anniversary of the World Trade Center tragedy and months away from the U.S. presidential election, a game-changing 9/11 documentary is ranking number three among "most watched" documentaries on PBS and number one among "most shared." Available for free online August 18th - September 4th, the documentary could have a significant effect on public opinion. Both the Republicans and Democrats, as equally staunch defenders of the official story, stand to be affected if the public's suspicion of government corruption grows deeper.

An earlier report on Digital Journal found that the claims made in the documentary can be verified by reading the government reports themselves. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the government agency charged with the investigation, did not provide any data -- no measurements or estimates -- of the mass or energy that would be required to bring down the buildings in about ten seconds. Normally a scientific report would present all the data that is used to construct a theory. The omission of data is a red flag to any one familiar with scientific procedure. It appears that the investigators may have intentionally produced reports that the scientific community would reject.

According to the experts appearing in Explosive Evidence, the scientific community did reject the reports immediately, but it has taken a very long time for this message to reach the public. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the producers of the documentary, have been trying to educate the public for a number of years. The PBS broadcast of their work represents a major step forward for them.

While most people have probably heard that a scientific investigation has been conducted and that the building collapses were explained, few have probably looked at the NIST reports themselves. Links to the NIST reports can be found in the above mentioned Digital Journal article. NIST provides no data whatsoever on the actual collapse sequence itself.

The new attention to the issue could be significant for the U.S. presidential election. Prior to the publication of the reports in 2005 and 2008, almost half the population was suspicious of the official story of 9/11, according to several opinion polls.

The 9/11 tragedy has been used to direct the policies that have led to the enormous increases in military spending and to a loss of civil liberties in the U.S. and worldwide. As the public becomes aware that the official story has not been given any scientific validation, voters may become more interested in Governor Gary Johnson (Libertarian Party) and Dr. Jill Stein (Green Party), who are currently running for U.S. President, in third and fourth places respectively, against Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. Both Johnson and Stein represent themselves as anti-war candidates and defenders of civil liberties.

Victoria N. Alexander, PhD is a philosopher of science.

Also from Digital Journal

Former State Dept official: 'No Easy Day' is 'cowardly' fiction

Read more:


I think this story deserves its own blog entry. Relevant, as continued 911 cover-up methodology.

who knows "Albury Smith"?

notorious bunk peddler is trying to set us straight in the comments over there. Other that him the commentors are almost totally in favor of truth.

Who Knows Albury Smith?

I don't but you got me curious. I did some surfing on the name and came up with the conclusion, after reading many posts by the same person, that Albury Smith is a notorious bunk peddler (Now where have I heard that term before....). I try to not take things personally but I get incensed when I see someone take things down to the "tin foil hat," name calling level. It is an insult to my intelligence. And its not like I think that the government is logging my every key-stroke and keeping them in some big server farm in Utah or anything and that they just poke around people's houses without a warrant when they are not at home, or put citizens on a kill list or something. Or that they keep secret lists with who know what on them. Or that the guy sitting beside me at the local mosque (I have some Muslim friends) is FBI or CIA, so why the "tin foil hat," insult? They should reserve that for paranoiacs, shouldn't they?


PBS has extended viewing indefinitely. Also, this is now the 3rd most watched on the NATIONAL PBS site. (Not just in Colorado).

Click on it and watch if you haven't already or watch it again NOW. Let's drive it to #1! This is mainstream!

Thanks RL

I clicked it many times

Where's the ombudsman now?

Not only in Colorado?! That's great! I guess that PBS Ombudsman is going to have to sit down and write another article--because his earlier one apparently didn't have the desired effect:

New Airings, Follow Up

Just received word that "9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out" is slated to run again on Sept. 14 at 10 pm and will repeat at least 2 more times through Sept. 16th on PBS in CO.

To be clear, the televised airings are in Colorado, but the video is now on the national PBS website, where it is 3rd "most shared" and 5th "most watched" nationally.

2nd "most shared" -- 3rd "most watched" now!

Sorry to keep butting in, but we've gotten a bump: Now "2nd most shared," up from 3rd. And "3rd most watched" up from 6th yesterday. NATIONAL PBS:

Your clarification

I appreciate the clarification. Even in it's most precise wording, it's still very good news.

Awesome uplifting and possibly game changing news!!

Spread this link for even more eyes to see:

All the documentary and social networking sites we know of. Peace.