Support 911Blogger


BUILDING EXPERTS WANT WORLD TRADE CENTER LAWSUIT TO CONSIDER CONTROLLED DEMOLITION EVIDENCE

November 1, 2012

BUILDING EXPERTS WANT WORLD TRADE CENTER LAWSUIT TO CONSIDER CONTROLLED DEMOLITION EVIDENCE

New York, NY - “Evidence of the explosive controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7 should be considered in court”, according to Richard Gage, AIA, founder of the group Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth). Gage’s comment was in response to a Reuters news story on October 18 “Judge questions WTC blame of United Airlines in September 11 case”. World Trade Center Properties (WTCP) blames the airlines for negligent behavior resulting in fires that caused the complete destruction of three World Trade Center skyscrapers on September 11, 2001. At issue is the extent of liability held by the airlines for lapses in security at Boston’s Logan Airport and the Portland, Maine, Jetport that day. The trial will determine the amount of compensation owed World Trade Center Properties for the destruction of the buildings themselves and the subsequent loss of income to WTCP.
“The building did not come down as a result of the fires.. Fire cannot pulverize concrete into dust and small pieces in mid-air.

Fire cannot melt steel, yet the steel was melted. Fire has never brought down steel-framed buildings,” says Gage, a 24 year architect, in response to Hellerstein’s announcement. “The forensic evidence shows that security lapses at the airports,” says Gage, “did not cause the collapse of those buildings.”

From the onset, the premise of the litigation has been that the airline defendants were negligent in their administration of security measures, allowing the 9/11 hijackers to board American Airlines Flight 11 and United Flight 175, take over the planes, and fly them into the Twin Towers. According to the lawsuit, the resulting inferno caused the destruction of the Towers. WTC Building 7, a football field’s distance away, sustained minor damage and a few relatively small meandering fires, presumably as a result of the collapse of the nearby North Tower. A study, conducted by the Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), blamed the complete collapse of WTC7, at 5:20 PM that same day, on those fires.

A 15 minute video starring Ed Asner thoroughly explains the evidence about the deliberate controlled demolition of World Trade Center Building 7. The title is “Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw
The group maintains that the airline defendants have been unfairly and incorrectly blamed for the complete destruction of the Twin Towers: “There is extensive physical, forensic and testimonial evidence that the buildings were brought down by explosive controlled demolition. By not introducing this evidence, the parties and the court have, apparently, blindly accepted a false account of what really happened. This has resulted in judgments of at least $4 billion from the airline defendants to date, and will result in many more such unnecessary and unjust losses if the airline defendants are unable to present all the available evidence in their defense.”
AE911Truth’s recently released documentary film, “9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out” which has been shown for several weeks on Denver’s PBS Station CPT12, features architects, engineers, and physicists explaining the characteristics and evidence of controlled demolition seen in the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7. The documentary was the “most watched” and “most shared” program on the PBS television network during the week following September 11, 2012 and remains very highly ranked.
Gage and more than 1,700 architects and engineers who have looked at the evidence recognize the characteristics of controlled demolition in the complete destruction of the three WTC buildings. These include: sudden onset of collapse, rapid downward acceleration, mid-air pulverization of concrete floor slabs, symmetrical structural failure, and near total dismemberment of the steel frame structure of all three buildings. Additional indication of controlled demolition is found in the complete lack of precedent for a steel framed high-rise to have ever collapsed due to fire prior to 9/11.
Says Gage: “Scientists have found evidence of the energetic material nanothermite, a highly engineered incendiary, or explosive, throughout the dust that completely blanketed lower Manhattan that day. Government agencies including USGS and the EPA, as well as an independent engineering firm reported the ubiquitous presence of miniscule iron spheres but have not provided any possible explanation for their formation. These can only be the residue of a thermitic reaction which are used by the military to cut through steel like a hot knife through butter. Still, this evidence of controlled demolition has not been introduced into the litigation. It is publicly available and should be entered into the case for the defense.”
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is a non-profit organization of of architects, engineers and affiliates dedicated to exposing the falsehoods and to revealing truths about the destruction of the three World Trade Center high-rises on September 11, 2001. Their mission is to research, compile, and disseminate scientific evidence relative to the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, calling for a truly open and independent investigation and supporting others in the pursuit of justice. For further information on Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, visit AE911Truth.org or call 510-292-4710.
###

Thanks Richard Gage

It's ridiculous for that most basic question of how the towers were brought down to be omitted from this lawsuit. I doubt they'll include it, but thanks for continuing to push the truth into the open as much as possible.

Experts should offer to be Expert Witnesses

Seems to me AE4911T should offer to be expert witnesses in the case, It's easy to show NIST's explanation is un-Scientific and cannot be used as evidence in any Lawsuit. Have AE4911T contacted the airlines legal departments?
For expenses and a donation? the airlines might save themselves a little under $4 Billion.