Support 911Blogger


Reaching more people by broadening our discussion points

In October of this year, I gave two talks in Missouri discussing 9/11, challenging the official narrative. Certainly I talked about the fall of the Towers and WTC7, but there is more to it than that. May I emphasize areas that are evidence-based and that I find also important in our discussions of 9/11:

1. How the government lied about factual dangers of the WTC dust, how thousands of people were in fact hurt by the WTC dust (see below);
2. The whistleblower testimony of Sec'y of Transportation Norman Mineta (50 miles out, 30 miles out, etc., reported to Dick Cheney);
3. The lack of air defenses that day, including at the Pentagon (2 and 3 are generally all I say about the Pentagon);
4. The whistleblower testimony of Sec'y of Treasury Paul O'Neill (he noted -from day one it was about getting us into Iraq; his opposing pre-emptive war, and how he was canned by Dick Cheney);
5. The whistleblower testimonies of Kevin Ryan, April Gallop, Susan Lindauer and Sibel Edmonds;
6. The attempts to discredit/marginalize whistleblowers (including myself) that also speaks of conspiracy to cover-up facts regarding 9/11;
7. Historical use of false-flag events by Germany, USA, and others to further political agendas; the Big Lie principle and why many people hesitate to question "official narratives";
8. The strange coincidence that emergency gear and hundreds of personnel were assembled in Manhattan on 9/10/01 (the day BEFORE the tragedy);
9. The destruction of evidence, that over 99.5% of the steel from the Towers and WTC7 was shipped to Asia for melting, contrary to the protests of scientists and engineers;
10. The remarkable growth and efforts of AE911Truth.org -- with over 1,700 architects and engineers and over 16,000 supporters now calling for an investigation. When questions arise about Judy Wood's book on DEW, I often refer to the FAQ at AE911Truth on this subject: http://www.ae911truth.org/news-section/41-articles/505-ae911truth-faq-6-whats-your-assessment-of-the-directed-energy-weapo... .
11. Public polls show that large numbers of the public question the "official 9/11 story." We are making progress despite the opposition.

As an example, the following is from one of my PPT slides for point # 1:

“At the White House's direction, the Environmental Protection Agency gave New Yorkers misleading assurances that there was no health risk from the debris-laden air after the World Trade Center collapse, according to an internal inquiry.... The White House "convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones" by having the National Security Council control EPA communications after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, according to a report issued late Thursday by EPA Inspector General Nikki Tinsley." http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/136350_epa23.html

The EPA Inspector General Nikki Tinsley then lost her job like so many other whistle-blowers. A compelling talk could be given focusing on whistle-blowers and what the government/corporation complex has done to squelch them.

Clearly, there is more to understanding 9/11 than just the fall of the Towers and WTC7 and evidence for thermitic materials (as important as these are). We may reach more people by broadening our discussion points.

Other indicators

There are other factual indicators:
- Unexplained rise in US money supply (the M1 measure) in August 2001 (as reported by another whistleblower*)
- Some Hijacker passports supposedly surviving the crashes (while black boxes did not).
- Put options on airlines and other companies affected by 9/11 (millions to one against it being by chance)
- Anthrax attacks immediately after 9/11 traced back to US Military Labs

==========================================================
* William Bergman - In August 2001 the Federal Reserve Board of Governors issued a non-routine supervisory letter warning Fed banks to be vigilant in monitoring suspicious activity reports. At the same time, the United States' economy was experiencing its largest June-August spike in M1 money supply since 1947, with more than $5 billion being added to the currency in circulation over that period. Piecing this information together at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago two years later, economist Bill Bergman wondered if the sudden infusion of currency might have been an indicator of foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks, as those with assets in danger of being frozen in the wake of such an attack would naturally want to liquidate their holdings before an investigation could occur. When Bergman wrote to the Board of Governors to ask for clarification as to why they had issued their supervisory letter, he was told that he had committed "an egregious breach of protocol in calling the Board staff and asking the question."

Excellent, Ynda.

I had not heard previously of William Bergman's question. Funny that the Board of Governors of the Fed would tell him that he had committed "an egregious breach of protocol" in "asking the question"! Very telling further evidence. Thanks for that.

Regarding the Put Options -- yes, a very important factual point that I've pointed to many times also.
Thanks again.

One of a small group...

Many thanks, Professor Jones! :-)

I'm sure the statistics of 9/11 would prove the official story to be completely false. The probabilities of the coincidences within the official when added together would demonstrate the complete impossibility of 19 suicide-hijackers-flying-through-the-world's-most heavily-defended-airspace etc official story. Of course, probabilities are not added but multiplied together. So Put-Options (1 in a 10,000, say) plus three unique tower collapses (1 in 10,000, say) plus four aircraft avoiding fighter detection (1 in a 10,000, say) equals 1 in 1,000,000,000,000 of the official story being true. And they are not the only coincidences...

Thanks Prof Jones

Speaking for myself, it was the physics of the 3 tower 'collapses' and the corroborating evidence that turned it for me.

I wholeheartedly agree that different types of evidence can be more meaningful to others to take a closer look at 9/11.

Agreed.

It was the fall of WTC7 that first got my eyes opened. Then I learned of Norman Mineta's whistleblower testimony and the lack of air defenses that fateful day. It is not hard to connect the dots, when someone patiently introduces you to the facts!

"Whistleblowers"

is indeed a powerful and beneficial term that many people will resonate to. I'd like to see a best-selling book or documentary titled, "9/11 Whistleblowers."

Indeed!

Indeed, James Corbett has published some background info on the subject here: http://www.corbettreport.com/articles/20100305_911_whistleblowers.htm

Oh, and yes, Thanks Professor Jones for the article! :-)

More on the List

This is a great summary, Professor Jones. If we had a functioning press, the names of the above mentioned whistleblowers would be household names. Just see what the press has done recently to Manning - until complaints, the Times wouldn't even send a reporter to the pre-trial motions. The dysfunctional press is also the reason, the public refuses to deny the illogical, idiotic government version of 9/11.

Here's another list with a few 9/11 whistleblowers and some other interesting ones. A video of forgotten 9/11 whistleblower is here - Kenneth Johanneman.

http://listverse.com/2011/08/18/top-10-witnesses-who-died-suddenly/

Very informative lists of whistleblowers -

Some names I don't think I'd heard of before, like Kenneth Johannemann, and others I was reminded of -- like Barry Jennings and my friend William Rodriguez. Very important eye-witness testimony by these three, damning to the "official story" of "no large explosions".

James Corbett is doing excellent work with his Corbett Report, IMO.

Thanks, and wishing you all a Merry Christmas!
Steve

THANK YOU JAMES CORBETT & STEVEN JONES

James Corbett is doing excellent work with his Corbett Report, IMO.

http://911blogger.com/search/node/corbett

HYPOTHESIS - Full Movie HD

Thank you Professor Jones

To risk everything for the truth shows what a great man you are. Let's us hope that more people open there eyes and see the truth as well. I really believe that America needs and deserves it.
Thank you for all you have done.

Good list, Steven

One day people might find it informative to investigate those who worked so hard to prevent the truth from coming out. For example, the dubious Jonathan Kay or the remarkably non-scientific "Popular Mechanics" and non-skeptical "Skeptic" characters.

Until then, another strong, evidence-based line of inquiry is the insider/informed trading.

Happy Christmas to a true Christian!

Thanks, Kevin -

Hope you're having a wonderful Christmas; and my warmest greetings to your wife and family.
And a happy New Year!

Ah, the coming year -- I wonder what it will bring...

In the houses of shadow

Daniel Hopsickers seminal work on ATTA in Florida has to be part of any presentation of OCT anomalies. His ground work in Venice FL, reporting Huffman locally known as covert base, and Amanda Keller as ATTA's lover, has to be in any overview.

The coming year? Rudi DEKKERS trial in Houston with the shadow of HUFFMAN and jeb BUSH on his shoulder should be fun.
I wonder how he will be 'guided through the process'.
Or if there will even be one. Maybe a Barry Seal moment?
Either way, after HSBC and Wachovia and LIBOR, dealing big, getting caught means nothing.

To the real skeptics., the 911 truth advocates.

All the best for the coming year.