AlienScientist and Aidan Monaghan debunk 9/11 POD theory and Judy Wood Published on Jan 8, 2013

AlienScientist and Aidan Monaghan debunk 9/11 POD theory and Judy Wood

Published on Jan 8, 2013

9/11 Researcher Aidan Monaghan helps me to debunk the POD/Missile/drone swap theory, and discusses other 9/11 misinfo and disinfo, some of which is covered in his new book "Declassifying 9/11" (an excellent compilation of Government Documents regarding 9/11 obtained from FOIA inquiries and revealing the holes in the official theory). We also discuss other disinformation that has been persistent within the 9/11 Truth Movement such as "No Plane" / "Hologram" theories and the DEW Demolition Theory of Judy Wood.

Declassifying 9/11:

Porter Goss Pentagon Explosion video:

This newer version was uploaded to correct some mistaken attributions to Pilots for 9/11 Truth as the original source of the POD misinfo. P4T have never endorsed the POD theory, and this mistaken attribution was the result of a film by Dave von Kleist which falsely labelled Glen Stanish as a "Founder of Pilots for 9/11 Truth". Also Glen MacDonald was never a member of Pilots for 9/11 Truth.
I was not aware of the original source of this information, and could not find that information through my own research prior to the original release of this video. Only after Rob Balsamo of Pilots for 9/11 Truth brought this to my attention, was I made aware of these facts. I apologize for the confusion and mistakes as well as any unintended blame I may have directed at the P4T organization.
It is now my belief that this original film promoting the POD theory by Dave von Kleist was a disinformation propaganda piece, and I unfortunately swallowed that poison pill... I am hoping that in 2013 we can purge more of these "poison pills" from our system, including the Judy Wood disinfo, and lead the 9/11 truth movement closer to Truth and Justice for the 9/11 victims and their families.


that the Remote Control theory has not been debunked


Yes. I've encountered people who make the unwarranted assumption that to argue against plane-swaps necessarily means accepting the official version re who was in control of the planes. Not so.

ALienScientist has my respect

ALienScientist has my respect and admiration for making this.