In the snopes article, it says on the 3rd bullet point'
"A man who was spotted in the woods near Sandy Hook Elementary on the day of the shootings and was detained by police was, according the the Newtown Bee, "an off-duty tactical squad police officer from another town"

Ok, so.... why was he running through the woods from police?

.

The comments right now are all of the "I know you are but what am I variety," what passes for insight and reasoned debate in the US.

"The classic conspiracy theorist sees the hidden hand in everything. Nothing is as it seems," he added. "There's something bigger that's going on. They don't know where it is, but they are willing to tantalize people and throw out any number of suggestions, which are oftentimes contradictory."
- B. Radford Media Mythmakers

The classic main stream follower blindly follows and believes everything that enters their senses, especially and primarily from individual or corporation with power and wealth. These entities are looked up to, this after all is mostly how American and world by and large define success, and thus correlate it with correctness, rightness and truth. Nothing is as it doesn't appear. There's never anything bigger or smaller or sinister or different from what they've been told going on. They know exactly how it is, because that's what they've been told by the people that control them sign their paycheck and feed them, so how could it be any different, and they will even sign up to defend it and be killed for it, regardless of any amount of seemingly glaring obvious problems anomalies or inconsistencies, which are often times quite congruent and collaborative.

Actually it is as it seems, a movie set, a drill, a farce. What it doesn't seem is a mass shooting. My limited knowledge tells me mass shootings especially in 600+ student school have chaos and bodies and damage and seriously grieving people and variety of collaborating witness testimony and on and on. We have no conclusive proof of the official narrative. No physical evidence. No hard evidence. Only talk, inconsistent unsupported intimidating non-forhcoming talk at that. We all know saying talk is cheap. Of course the Post will say what they say, they are corporate owned controlled msm, who would expect otherwise. Obviously this is all a story of David and Goliath. individual investigators seeing problems making claims and trillion dollar backed msm going to every extreme to cover themselves.

Tie that together with the concept that some most or many people will fight to death to hold onto their world construct view, no matter how absurd a situation

So here they've called in two investigators, Snopes.com and Media Mythmakers =)
Some of their points they try to offer ...

Rifle issue - The Post supports its view by quoting Lt Vance. Somehow, we're supposed to believe as fact whatever Lt Vance says, which makes no sense, let us see proof, not just words, anyone can say anything
Gene Rosen - The Post supports its view by telling us he is retired psychologist, but where is proof, now it's only words, not supported, not documented. Can they prove he was never involved with acting. Show us proof. They also say he said there were 4 children, but watch the video, he says 6 children
Memorial sites set up before shooting - Do they have proof Google makes mistake or error with dates. Just to say they make error, doesn't prove anything
Victims not expressing proper levels of grief - They say certain videos have been cherry picked, but show us any video or photo where parents or students or anyone from supposed crime scene is crying. Rather there are plenty of video showing people smiling, laughing and acting without remorse. And there is video where there is conscious shift in character from indifferent or smiling to trying to appear distraught or saddened. Not even the president cries, rather makes effort to wipe away tear but no water. What are the vast quantities of evidence that we're ignoring or rejecting?
Emilie Parker or her sister photo - Maybe this claim is error i don't know enough about it

There's still many unexplained anomalies...
Asking questions is first step to solving crime or testing hypothesis or making experiment. First you formulate questions, then look for answer. What type of gun(s), where were the bullet wounds, how many girls and how many boys, who was killed, what type of bullets, did any guns jam, what was motive, did he say anything about why, what was prior experience with guns, has shooter been to shooting range, where did shooter purchase ammunition, how many rounds were fired, where are all the students, where are video from new security system, why are emergency vehicles sitting still, why are cars blocking entrance and exit area, why is black car parked by itself by entrance, did emt have necessary support, were they able to save anyone that was near death, who were the 2 adults who were injured from inside the school, who and why was person on ground with handcuffs, who and why was person running through woods, why was the principle supposedly killed but then giving description to editor of local paper, where is video of shooting, why is coroner behaving strange, or unable to answer many questions, why are little girls making satanic signs, and older man in another photo, how does media know how many are dead shortly after shooting, why was women sent sms by cbs? why are people behaving strangely, what does his brother say about him, who was he last seen with or talking to either in person or online, what types of drugs or other chemicals were found in his body, how did he get them, what prescriptions did he have, did he have a family doctor, any notes or letters in his apartment, what are common thread(s) if any between mass shootings in different cities, why are gov agency drills planned and going on simultaneously, and on and on....

These are called questions. When making investigation, one asks questions. Then through process of obtaining data, a hypothesis or conclusion is formed. This is healthy investigative process. It is diseased to not ask questions. Not seeking leads to not finding leads to no raise in consciousness and no advancement for either individual or collective society
It seems that the "tantalizing could be" is all anyone has thus far offered, and the official narrative offered seems much more tantalizing than the reality

The agenda of someone who seeks truth is truth. The agenda of someone or some entity who obfuscates misleads threatens labels or marginalizes is something else.

"Political conspiracy theorists are completely wrong [in their conclusions], but they're not crazy," he told HuffPost. "The leading conspiracy theorists ... are right on many of their initial factual claims. Depending on what the theory is, they might even be correct in all of their claims. Where they are wrong is connecting the dots that aren't there."
- D.J. Grothe James Randi Educational Foundation

People who blindly follow the every whim of their psymaster or paymaster often have no clue what's happening either to them or around them, either through compartmentalization containment or blind faith, and they aren't crazy, rather it's the person or entity who is enslaving them who is 'crazy', without sense of connectedness to and consciousness with humanity, Nature and the Divine Spirit. The leading blind followers may be able to survive and teach regarding many things, such as daily living and keeping up with the Jones's, however, the fundamental error or problem arises when they need to make transition into next world, because they fail to overcome fear to sit still long enough to begin to connect the dots that are there, while they are here.

The mentality of this article highlights the serious predicament facing us all

When will other professors, scholars, scientists and/or real investigators speak up with Mr Tracy?

He is a level-headed, conscientious and respectable fellow American trying his best to speak truth to power, to raise questions about many unanswered questions, and perhaps most important to raise awareness for the sleeping masses. I think he should be at top of the list for man of the year or nobel peace prize, along with many dedicated researchers for 9/11 truth.

Of course there are many citizen journalists, true alternative media and individuals also raising questions, yet Mr Tracy is mostly alone under this spotlight of being smeared and bullied by the likes of Anderson Cooper, and other worthless msm, who will go to any length, except making real analysis, to try to keep their image alive.

This isn't fair for Mr Tracy, we need others to stand next to him and support him and help him share this burden since he is trying to help us all, we also must give help back. Surely people like Dr Steven Jones must know how Mr Tracy feels, and many others, so let's support him, stand next to him

Is everyone so worried that they will get sucked in and at last minute our openly corrupt gov (Fast and Furious, etc., etc., etc., ...ad infinitum...) and controlling manipulating compromised lying msm will whip out all kinds of proof for the official narrative? That this is some big psyop set up to trap the many hard working individuals churning out volumes of truthful research for 9/11 and other events, such as 7/7 and Oklahoma bombing, and on and on...

is there a concern this will be the gov and msm coup d 'etat to finally smear and bury the 9/11 truth movement? Then how, many people's incomes will be shattered, their lives will be shattered since they've been investing everything they have for so many years into efforts for truth and creating awareness, no one will watch info wars, no t-shirts or emergency kits will be sold, no hits to 911Blogger or other truth website, no one will tune in anymore to alternative talk shows, and these owners will have to find other means to support themselves and their families?

So at end of day, is this what it's all about, that everyone is making their living off of this both in terms of food and keeping ego alive, and if it comes out that the Sandy Hook official narrative is true, then it would tarnish all this, and force massive upheaval in people's lives. If so, it seems we should make some serious internal investigation into ourselves, ask ourselves some hard questions

If the Sandy Hook thing does get this knock out sucker hook from gov and msm, then so be it. Bring it on. Let them, and then let all the chaos ensue. But, does it then all of the sudden make Kevin Ryan's dedicated conscientious painstakingly difficult work involving treasonous crimes of Ralph Eberhart NORAD's commander on 9/11 false, or all the published scientific papers from Dr Niels Harriet and Dr Steven Jones et al also false, or the first responder witnesses testimonies false, or Norman Mineta's testimony false, no no no no and no.

Let's support professor Tracy and others like him, just as we also look for people to support us. As Joe has pointed out, 9/11 truth is a subset of Truth. All of us in the truth community, searching for truth together, must come together, support each other, stand side by side, and ride through these storms. MSM and gov always want us divided, as jack Blood pointed out in recent interview with James Corbett. We must stop participating in their paradigm, their way of controlling us, and one way we must do that, is by coming together whole and united. Together we stand divided we fall.

NB. In another similarity to 9/11, it's an important point raised that some entities intentionally sewing dis or mis-information in order to muddy the waters or poison the well to distract people from understanding and trying to make/offer analysis of other controversial events (conspiracies), therefore making it easier for MSM to fool the masses, by pointing to obvious falsities (shifting the focus) yet underneath still not mentioning glaring anomalies.

Btw, Paul Watson is saying this is a very real tragedy, when in fact we don't know for sure yet what is real.

"I also have a sense that the latent backlash from 9/11 has built a skeptical population, one that is ready to turn to alternative news sources when they smell a fish. This may blow up faster and far worse than the 9/11 movement, because the distrust of the government is higher than it's ever been. It is a safer environment to ask difficult questions in, and in a way, this can help the 9/11 truth movement. Once you make a conscious decision to distrust mainstream media and the US government, everything is on the table, including Sandy Hook."

NEW HAVEN, Conn. (AP) — Yale University was locked down for nearly six hours Monday as authorities responded to a phone call warning that an armed man was heading to shoot up the school that they are investigating as a likely hoax. Police: Yale campus safe, no gunman found

http://news.yahoo.com/police-yale-campus-safe-no-gunman-found-211951665.html