Gladio Revisited- corbettreport Published on Feb 1, 2013

Gladio Revisited - Corbett Report

Published on Feb 1, 2013

As one of the most thoroughly-documented examples of a decades-long program of officially-sanctioned false flag terror, Operation Gladio remains a woefully under-reported piece of the War on Terror puzzle. Today we go behind the trite summarizations of this program to look at it in-depth, examine its roots, and discover how it is continuing to operate right through to the present day.

I don't get it

At one point it appears Edmonds suggests 9/11 was a betrayal by business partners (i.e. by the bin Laden/Zawahiri faction against their US partners who were secret allies in the Islamization of Central Asia plan). In another article she suggests the US side let it happen. In the past she has suggested that the low level al Qaeda (i.e. hijackers) are focused upon while upper level al Qaeda (which presumably in part means Turkish intel/deep state/drugs) are ignored.

Where do the hijackers enter into the equation? CIA? Saudi GID?

What about Alec Station? The embassy bombings. USS Cole. Millennium plots.

How did the Turkish/US Gladio operatives interface with the hijackers?

Operation Gladio: From Neo-Fascists to Mujahedeen (aka Al Qaeda)

Unveiling the Curtain on the West’s Strategically Orchestrated & Executed Global Terror Campaign

Documentation Episode 049 – Paperclipped Nazis and Stay-behind G

Episode 049 – Paperclipped Nazis and Stay-behind Gladios
Time Reference: 01:04

Gladio – BBC2 1992 Documentary
Time Reference: 03:38

Operation Gladio – Wikipedia
Time Reference: 04:23
Time Reference: 07:34

Interview 582 – Tom Secker on Operation Gladio
Time Reference: 08:37

Deep State Coup Averted in Turkey
Time Reference: 22:13

Ergenekon, Sledgehammer, and the Politics of Turkish Justice: Conspiracies and Coincidences
Time Reference: 23:08

Interview 595 – Sibel Edmonds on NATO, Terrorism, 9/11 and Drug Running
Time Reference: 25:56

Evil Report by Jed Curtis
Time Reference: 56:23


One of the difficulties of understanding 9/11 is the attempt to put all the info into context. For example there is a new documentary coming to HBO in May called Manhunt: The Search for Bin Laden. Director Greg Barker was joined at Sundance by former CIA agents Nada Bakos, Marty Martin (a former chief of Alec Station) and Cindy Storer. All three CIA agents were involved in the documentary. Were these people duped (in regard to al Qaeda)? Were they telling deliberate lies? Did they truly believe al Qaeda was an independent terrorist organization that had no hidden sponsors?

Why is it so difficult for US media to ask real questions about 9/11? In all the articles I read about the documentary the agents basically claimed the CIA was on point and the politicians dropped the ball. There was no mention of deliberate CIA obstruction. No mention of why Tenet lied about CIA conduct. It isn't credible to suggest the Bush administration was fixated on state sponsors (i.e. Iraq, Iran) and thus dropped the ball. That is an absurd explanation in light of all information available to the public. For example information about obstructed investigations can be found in mainstream books like The Looming Tower and The Black Banners.

What is the context? Did CIA agents not question the bizarre conduct of their superiors? Were these CIA agents amused as they pulled one over on the unsuspecting public at Sundance? Are CIA agents Straussian true believers who accept the notion that the ends justify the means?

I would love to hear an interview with one of these CIA agents by someone who isn't a CIA cheerleader so maybe the public could finally get some answers about 9/11.