AE911Truth Activists Reach Out to Democracy Now

Will Amy Goodman Break the 9/11 Media Silence?
Is Amy Goodman part of the “silent majority” when it comes to questioning the official 9/11 story?
 photo Amy_Goodman_zps33945712.png

For a journalist, when something cannot be said, the silence is the most important story. Many people believe that Amy Goodman, host of the popular public radio and TV show Democracy Now!, is among the best when it comes to confronting people in power and asking hard questions. She may be one of the best, but her silence about 9/11 is stunning. For example, she has yet to tell her audience or her readers that nearly 2,000 architects and engineers – all verified and vetted – are calling for a new investigation of the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11, citing evidence of controlled demolition. That should be headline news for a journalist whose self-described role is to report on alternative voices excluded by the mainstream media.

Goodman is an accomplished author and syndicated columnist, and Democracy Now! airs on more than 1,000 television and radio stations in 35 countries. She is the first journalist to receive the Right Livelihood Award, widely known as the “Alternative Nobel Prize” for “developing an innovative model of truly independent grassroots political journalism that brings to millions of people the alternative voices that are often excluded by the mainstream media.” Goodman was also an eyewitness to the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers on 9/11; video footage from that tragic day appears to show her ducking for cover with other bystanders as WTC7 came down at free-fall acceleration. However, she won’t report about the calls for a real 9/11 investigation that have been made by thousands of technical professionals and over 100 family members of 9/11 victims.

Last fall, Goodman launched a 100-city tour promoting her new book, The Silenced Majority, along with her co-author, Denis Moynihan. As they describe their book, it is “intended to provide a vivid record of the events, conflicts, and social movements that are shaping our society today. The book gives voice to ordinary people standing up to corporate and government power across the country and around the world. Their writing and daily work at the grassroots public TV/radio news hour Democracy Now! casts, in stark relief, the stories of the ‘silenced majority.’ These stories are set against the backdrop of the mainstream media’s abject failure, with its small circle of pundits who know so little about so much, attempting to explain the world to us and getting it so wrong.”
 photo Goodman_poster_zpsaaf81621.jpg
[AE911Truth activists brought this poster to Amy Gooodman’s book signing to call attention one of the most silenced news stories in America]

On September 26, the book tour came to the University of Connecticut with a presentation, followed by a book signing, at the UConn Student Union. During Goodman’s presentation, she mentioned that all news about the conflict in East Timor was obliterated from the media and was not mentioned once from 1975 until she was assaulted and beaten in 1989 (which made the news). She mentioned how the police have been militarized since 9/11 and gave personal examples of how this has affected journalism. She mentioned 9/11 many times as being a significant event that has precipitated the loss of our civil liberties, but not once did she mention anything about the overwhelming body of evidence questioning the official story of what happened on 9/11.

In advance of this event, our local AE911Truth Action Group researched Amy’s history of reporting on 9/11 and found out that she did have an “interview” with producers of the 9/11 Truth documentary Loose Change in 2006, which included the surprise addition of two editors of the Popular Mechanics series, “Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can’t Stand Up to the Facts.” The interview pitted the professional “hired guns” from the Hearst Corporation, owner of Popular Mechanics, against the courageous young filmmakers in an ill-matched debate.

As Amy Goodman talks with some of her fans, AE911Truth Congressional Outreach Team leader Wayne Coste (left) prepares to deliver an important message to her

The only other time Goodman has dealt with the 9/11 Truth issue on her show was in August 2011, when she interviewed the head of the Internet Archive about the BBC news report in which Jane Standley reported the fall of WTC7 – 20 minutes before it occurred.

AE911Truth supporters and WeAreChange activists have asked Goodman about the 9/11 evidence on many occasions, and she has given a lukewarm response, sometimes claiming that she supports a real investigation and sometimes ignoring the question altogether.

To highlight her reluctance to speak out about the 9/11 tTruth issue, we developed a quarter-page flyer and a large 30-in x 40-in poster that said:

“Newscasting is the art of the Story and the Silence; When something cannot be said, the Silence is the most important Story;
Amy Goodman cannot say: “Nearly 2000 architects and engineers have signed a petition calling for a new investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center Towers on September 11th, citing evidence of controlled demolition with pre-planted explosives.”

Why can’t Amy say this? Certainly … 2000 architects and engineers … opposing fraudulent engineering reports … should be worth reporting ... because that fact is important.”

We handed out the quarter-page flyer until we were told to stop because “canvassing or soliciting” within or around the UConn Student Union was not allowed without a permit. I was told I could not display the poster so that the text and image were visible, because that was also considered to be soliciting or canvassing. Following this warning, I grudgingly joined the “silenced majority.”

During the book signing, I brought the poster back out and ignored warnings from Student Union security personnel to turn the poster around so that the text and image could not be seen. When the security officer said that it would be necessary to call the campus police, I responded, “I am here with Amy; we are breaking the silence together!” Denis Moynihan waved off the security staff, indicating that they were not to call the campus police, so I remained visible with the poster until it was time to get my copy of the book signed.

When I asked Amy to sign my book, I introduced myself. I told her,

“You were one of my heroes… but I hold AE911Truth founder Richard Gage, AIA, as an even greater hero, since he works tirelessly to get out the truth out about what really happened at the World Trade Center on 9/11.”

Then I gave her a boxed copy of 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out. I let her know that the story about 9/11 Truth was breaking and that Experts Speak Out became the #1 viewed and the #1 shared video on the national PBS website during last year’s 9/11 anniversary.

In the end, Wayne was allowed to approach Amy Goodman and display his informative poster, even though she sidestepped any discussion of 9/11 Truth

Using a sticky note like everyone else, I asked Amy to write “Wayne, keep trying to break the silence.” (As a volunteer who commits many hours per week to Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, breaking the silence about 9/11 is my focus.) However, all she wrote was “Wayne, Democracy Now!” I guess she does not want me to break the silence about what really happened on 9/11, but perhaps she will watch Experts Speak Out and somehow find the courage to take a stand.

Goodman appears to have fallen more in line with the mainstream media by ignoring the 9/11 Truth issue, but don’t let her inaction stop you from taking action. Join us by signing our petition, becoming a member, and volunteering on one of our many vital teams, and help us continue to break news barriers around the world.

Contacting the Media and keeping pressure up...

A few days ago I asked Rachel Maddow this question:

"In your documentary "Hubris" why didn't you address the motives for Dick Cheney and George Bush lying us into the War in Iraq? Isn't motive an integral aspect of journalism, as well as concepts such as "follow the money", etc?"

and got this response:

"Hi -- thanks for asking this! And thanks, everyone, for there being so many good questions about Hubris. The question of motive is the elephant in the living room of this story. It's also almost impossible to report out, until the people who had those motives decide to repent (and explain). Or until people who have evidence of the honest expression of those motives at the time, feel able to bring that evidence forward. President Bush and Vice President Cheney have been asked about their motives many times, but so far they're sticking with the (various) stories they came up with at the time. I think the truth is still out there -- it's going to take time (and conscience) to shake it loose. Meantime, all we've got is supposition and circumstantial evidence."

I was pleased with her term "elephant in the living room" and the admission that "the truth is still out there". I was disappointed in her reliance upon the criminals to confess their crimes before you can report on them. My response is here. This was a public "Ask Me Anything" type event where she only answered 22 questions, so I was lucky to get mine in. Two other of my questions here and here went unanswered.

You can try contacting her here:

Keith Olberman gets questioned on 9/11 Truth:

I think its great anytime we can keep the pressure up on the mainstream media and their employees.

I like Maddow's remark

" it's going to take time (and conscience) to shake it loose "

2/3's correct

It's going to take time and consciousness. But the statement, "all we've got is supposition and circumstantial evidence" is her weakest part of her general premise.

A follow up question for her the next time she's on a book junket could be :

"Ms. Maddow you said it's going to take" time and conscious" to address the proverbial "elephant in the room" re guarding the September 11th attacks. You've also said in the same statement to citizen journalist's that "all we've got is supposition and circumstantial evidence" re guarding the motives of those involved, particularly GWB and Cheney.

If by supposition you meant hypothetical without facts to support a claim, are you open to looking at non suppositional evidence relating to the destruction of the 3 WTC's?

It will be interesting to see how both of their programs will treat the JFK assassination's 50 year this year.

On a lighter note

I have hope that one day (or night) Rachel Maddow and Amy Goodman will come out of the 9/11 closet . Maybe even together. Maybe with a Lance Armstrong cameo .THAT would make a memorable AE911SUPER BOWL AD; )

Report out?

"Report out" is that a correct phrase, it sounds rather wooden? Anyway, if the motives of Bush and Cheney were so abstruse, so arcane, so esoteric and so difficult to "report out," how would you even know enough to ask that question in the first place? It is sickening that the people from the oh-so-ironicly named "Air America," deliberately act so obtuse.

Rachel Maddow CV:

Education: University of Oxford (2001), Stanford University (1994), Castro Valley High School, Lincoln College, Oxford

She majored in Rhetoric and Tap Dancing


Peter, I just looked - Rachel Maddow makes 2 million per year so she would never be able to find another job like she has for that amount and because of that she has to do her bosses' bidding regarding 9/11.

I couldn't find the salary for Amy Goodman but the situation is similar.

It boils down to materialism

The thing about studying these socipathatic people in positions of high global power is that so many "conspiracy theorists" tie them in with Satan worship or Luciferian worship, etc. I think ingorance, psychosis and human cruelty are enough to create all the hell anyone could imagine. But I do think the Satan inclination makes one ponder in this sense. The Gnostics were dualists. There were many sects of Gnostics beliefs, but a common theme was that spirit was good and material world was evil. There is strong argument by some writers that Jesus was a Gnostic, a belief in knowledge and that one could only experience God through God's creation. So a life well lived is all that one could imagine God would hope we would do. So Satan comes to Jesus and offers him the material world, and Jesus says what good does it a man to inherit the earth only to lose his soul? So in a way I think those journalists mentioned above are satanists in that they put their careers, their status and their financial security ahead of the truth. I'd add Thom Hartmann to that list.

Now Peter B. Collins has substituted for Thom H in the past but not for a long time. Peter B has hosted 9/11 media events and MCs the Firehoust 9-11 video packaged with Experts Speak out and 9/11 Blueprint. Peter B has largely lost his microphone, at least I haven't heard him on the radio for ages because of his belief and courage to speak out. His fate and others like him scare the Goodman's and Hartmanns who rationalize that if they were to lose their voice then all the good things they say would be lost to listeners. And it's true and that's the rub, but silence means the deadly mass murders and war makers are free, getting US govt, British and Israel pensions and are looking at maps of Iran and Syria you can bet. Just look at the US Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce Leadership and Members if you want to see the new PNAC on steroids.

There have been far too many generations of Americans striving for more convenience, more comfort, more pampering, bigger more elaborate McMansions, ubiqitous exotic coffees, and increasingly self worth is identified with self net worth. People are afraid to be seen as not affluent and not influential. The risk is not worth it right now. As we drag people kicking and screaming to the utter realization that the buildings were imploded and once they learn of the connections among the top leaders in our society only then will the Professional Journalists begin to whisper what should be shouted from the rooftops.

So the bottom line is satanism or luciferianism is materialism. The stock market is run by extreme satanists, you might say and the media people self-censor and or are censored by higher order satanists or materialist which ever synonym you prefer.

Most Journalists like Polititians ...

are not willing to risk their hard earned trust, popularity and integrity as journalists so long as powerful media entities like journalist/pundit Jonathan Kay are swimming about, ready to pounce on any good name who dares publicly question the events of 9/11.

It's going to take time (and conscience) to shake it loose...

Amy's career is more important than 9/11 truth, someone else with big kahunas will have to do it such like our very own brave Barrie Zwicker did here in Canada... My thoughts and reactions has always been to folks like Amy " Think for yourself and let others enjoy the privilege of doing so too." Amy can think what ever she wants. ( love her show )

In the mean-time while we wait for the brave to make a stand - In the famous words of Jello Biafra ' Don't Hate The Media, Be The Media!" and that's exactly what we need to do as activists in the 911 truth movement. It's better than whining about those not willing.


for the diamond in the rough CPT-12, Denver. Send them a contribution.

Journalists Not

David Halberstam was a journalist and reporter. The words can no longer be used for Amy Goodman and Rachel Maddow. They are merely actors (and bad ones) pretending to be interested in the truth.

Aiding and abetting terrorists.

Amy Goodman, Noam Chomsky, Bill Maher, Jon Stewart, The Nation, and the rest of the so-called "liberal" media, alongside the mainstream TV and radio networks, have been the greatest friends to those responsible for the 9/11 attacks. These media personalities and outlets, both mainstream and "alternative" have consistently bought and supported a story that has been proven over and over to be false - with impossible elements - and insodoing, they are colluding with, aiding and abetting, and protecting, terrorists.

Whoever was responsible for the attacks are still out there, on the loose, and may strike again - at a time of their choosing. If, God forbid, that ever happens, then the blood of thousands - maybe more- will be on the hands of the media, including those of Amy Goodman.

Reminds me of this supposed quote...

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." - David Rockefeller at Bilderberg Meeting... Baden-Baden, Germany 1991

Well stated bloggulator

"...the so-called "liberal" media, alongside the mainstream TV and radio networks, have been the greatest friends to those responsible for the 9/11 attacks. These media personalities and outlets, both mainstream and "alternative" have consistently bought and supported a story that has been proven over and over to be false - with impossible elements - and insodoing, they are colluding with, aiding and abetting, and protecting, terrorists.
Whoever was responsible for the attacks are still out there, on the loose, and may strike again - at a time of their choosing. If, God forbid, that ever happens, then the blood of thousands - maybe more- will be on the hands of the media, including those of Amy Goodman."

As much as...

I "appreciate" all of the "work" certain people have done to equate "9/11 Truth" with the question of how those buildings came down, however, this statement "The only other time Goodman has dealt with the 9/11 Truth issue on her show was in August 2011, when she interviewed the head of the Internet Archive about the BBC news report in which Jane Standley reported the fall of WTC7 – 20 minutes before it occurred" is false.

She has had Sibel Edmonds, Phil Shenon, Bob Graham (Saudi Arabia) on, and here is a link to Israel and 9/11... and a related video.

Here is a video of her covering the families call for Zelikow's resignation...

Here is an article that describes my problems with her...

"I want to make clear that the premise of this question is not based on buildings, missiles or any other theory. It’s based on the fact that a great wrong has taken place, and there needs to be real truth, justice and accountability. On 9/11/2006, 9/11 Family Members Donna Marsh O’Connor, Christina Kminek, and Michele Little got together at the National Press Club to call for a new investigation. In February 2008, the famous Jersey Girls called for a new investigation after allegations that Philip Zelikow took direction from Karl Rove. During the latter part of 2009, there was an initiative to get a new investigation into 9/11 on the ballots of NYC. Over 80,000 New Yorkers and 100+ family members supported this. Why didn’t Democracy Now! cover any of this? You’re supposed to be the Alternative media, Amy. When the media doesn’t work, those with a voice need to use it. Please start covering the multitude of cover-ups pertaining to 9/11, and please start providing coverage to the family members seeking justice."

Cindy, myself, and others are riding bikes across the country for peace starting on 4/4 (I will be in the support vehicle).

Jon's right

In addition, Amy also had the Loose Change crew face to face with Popular Mechanics in a very unbiased interview, which is what she's supposed to do as a journalist. I totally agree with Jon on this one. Amy obviously doesn't want to talk about Building Seven or controlled demolition. I think it would far more valuable to hold her to account on the issues she HAS expressed concern over. I really wish the next time a 9/11 truth activist confronts her, s/he says something like: "Amy, in the past you've expressed concerns about what we've been told by our government about 9/11. What is it that concerns you most? Do you think they are telling us the truth?" or something like that. I wish people would stop trying to pigeonhole her to talk about what they want her to talk about. She may have aced English and flunked math. Who knows?

Amy should facilitate discussion, without fear or favor

Amy may have aced English and flunked math, but that is no excuse for a journalist to fail to facilitate the democratic free flow of information.

Isn't it her role as a journalist to be impartial and open to analysis? Isn't it her role to scrutinise data and self-serving narrative? She is in a position to call on a broad array of experts to clarify physics, if numbers and logic are not her strong suit.

Can she at least ask why a US Dept of Commerce body, NIST, offers embarrassingly truncated and erroneous cartooNIST explanations for a war-triggering event? NIST's narratives are fine for Cartoon Network - where Tom and Jerry walk through walls in defiance of Newtonian physics - but they insult the intelligence of the wider world.

Should the moral and intelligent Goodman not follow information where it leads, without fear or favour, allowing the chips to fall where they may?

Let's ask Goodman, supposedly a paragon of the best of American journalism:
"What are your parameters? Are you truly free, independent and professional enough to practice journalism without fear or favour? Come clean about why the world should NOT hear the words of Gage, Szamboti et al on "Democracy Now'.'

you've got a point

While I think she was "fair" in her show with Loose Change and Popular Mechanics, they were mismatched guests. Gage and Ryan would have been a better match up with PM than Avery, Bermas, and Rowe. But if she did flunk math, she truly can't see the cartoonish nature of NIST's explanations. It is what it is. My point is that success in reaching people is achieved by working with THEIR perspective, not ours.

A.J. Hammer of CNN...

It would be great if someone could catch A.J. Hammer on tape discussing the professional reaction from CNN on his reporting of 9/11 Conspiracies around the time of Charlie Sheen. I see he is still employed by CNN.

It would be interesting to see what his response would be to questions about pressures he received after this.

Amy Goodman

Anyone who follows this stuff knows that Amy Goodman dances around the topic just like all the other journalists. She and other journalists all may have good reason. Or at least a reason. They obviously feel threatened either by loosing their job or connections or maybe there are other threats we just don't know about.

So how do we solve this. I suggest a "Day" simple huh but this is all we need. Just a day when everyone can come forward together and unite us as one people, US citizens that care about the future of our friends and families.
This topic cannot divide us like Republicans vs Democrats. To do this right it must unite us. I say this 9/11/2013 we all unite around "the truth will set you free" We all must speak out together as one people. We shall bring justice to this cause together.

This cause needs leadership from journalists, politicians, lawyers, judges, Hollywood and beyond.

And definitely a leader with better grammar than me. If anyone has any suggestions that can make this better or go about it different I am all ears.

Threatened, or self censorship? Or some of each?

Like we here, I would hazard a guess that she probably doesn't know the *actual identities* of those who were directly responsible for the attacks. However, she is a very astute person and has built up an "alternative media" empire and she is far from stupid, or stupefied by propaganda. She must be very well aware that the official story cannot be true. So, the mystery remains - why has she actively rendered discussion of 9/11 off limits? Clear she has been censored, but has this censorship been from within - ie self-censorship, or via threats from external sources? This same question can be addressed to any so-called 'open' or "alternative media' outlets and figureheads.

Strange Pattern

Whenever the truth movement has a breakthrough, or is about to break through, strange things seem to happen. A few examples over the past several years:

*Hunter S. Thompson was writing about WTC demolition when he suddenly was 'suicided'

* When AJ Hammer had on Charlie Sheen and the story was getting traction, along with the ET poll supporting Sheen by a huge percentage, Ed Asner was about to go on the show and was rejected. Asner at this point might have been a factor in blowing things open. He was denied an interview, and ET hasn't touched the subject since.

*There was to be a theater release of "Loose Change - Final Cut" in 2007 narrated by Charlie Sheen and distributed by Mark Cuban. Someone threatened Sheen's career and the project was nixed.

*Dennis Kucinich promised to launch an investigation into several aspects of 9/11, including insider trading, but it never happened. He reiterated this promise over and over. Did someone get to him? His brother, Perry, died around this time. I don't know if that was a factor.

*NYC CAN's ballot initiative met the requirements for valid signatures but was squashed in court.

*AE911Truth presented to the National Press Club in D.C. to a packed house, including networks and CNN. The story only ran in Utica, NY and on Iranian Press TV.

*AE911Truth's attempt for a Grand Jury investigation of NIST was thwarted as it turns out NIST is immune from litigation.

*Judge Hellerstein managed to dispose of any 9/11 lawsuits from people who refused settlement.

*The 1st round of BuildingWhat? did spark an initial round of media attention, including Geraldo Rivera, Judge Nap, AlterNet, and New York 1, but then total silence thereafter. Geraldo won't touch the subject again, and the 2nd Round of Ads was a bust, drawing no coverage.

*Jesse Ventura managed to get some choice interviews for two of his books, in which he made some great and not-so-great comments, but was demonized. Now he is banned from MSM (I think).

*The movie starring Martin Sheen and Woody Harrelson, ultimately called "September Morn," died mysteriously in production. The celebrity power had great potential to break things open.

*The Occupy movement held some potential for bringing 9/11 truth into the limelight, but it folded or was sabotaged.

*Excellent books by 9/11 truth authors can't get TV interviews due to some censorship policy. Bill Moyers snubbed David Griffin's book "Debunking 9/11 Debunking" even though it won his own contest.

*Amy Goodman cowers in terror at the idea of covering AE911Truth. Huffington Post outright censored Jesse Ventura's article about the 1,000 AE milestone event in SF. Took it down!

*Rosie O'Donnell was forced out of her host spot on "The View" largely for Building 7 comments. She was being crucified by the media, but still millions of people were taking notice and listening. At one point she was trying to have David Ray Griffin on to debate others. I remember the day that was supposed to air, Dubya held a freak press conference at exactly 11: am despite the fact that the show had already been scrubbed.

Awesome List...

This is an interesting and incredible list. Thank you for compiling it. Was that from memory? I hope many people here copy and paste this into a folder and add to it and spread it around. Thanks RL McGee!!

A pattern? You can say that again

This approach has a lot of potential. There must be dozens more ...

* Shortly before he died in a mysterious airplane crash 11 days prior to the 2002 elections, Minnesota Sen. Paul Wellstone met with Vice President Dick Cheney. Wellstone was said to be delving rigorously into the events of 9/11.

* Author and ex-CIA pilot Phillip Marshall was about to publish a book called The Big Bamboozle about 9/11 being an obvious inside job when he killed himself after shooting his own beloved teenage children execution style.

Only a tinfoil hat wearing coincidence theorist could fail to connect the dots.

.... just for speaking up....

This video includes a list of people who have died in suspicious fashion, all of whom were witnesses to aspects of 9/11, or knew something that the planners and executors of the attacks did not want public airing.

This list is far from complete, of course. :(

Mysterious Deaths

CIA Director William Colby
Sean Hoare ~ Murdoch Whisleblower
Deborah Jeane Palfrey ~ D.C. Madam
Mike Connell ~ Ohio Election Fraud
Paul Wellstone ~ Election, 9/11
Gary Webb ~ investigative journalist
Danny Casolaro ~ investigative journalist
Jim Hatfield ~ Bush author
Pat Tillman ~ Patriot
Hunter S. Thompson ~ Gannon-9/11-Intro to LC
Dr. Bruce Ivins ~ Anthrax
Lori Klausutis ~ aide to Joe Scarborough
Beverly Eckert ~ 9/11 widow plane crash
Dr. David Kelly ~ British Weapons Inspector
Barry Jennings ~ WTC 7 Whistleblower
John O'Neill ~ worked in WTC first day
Dr. David Graham ~ 9/11 Whistleblower
JFK Jr. ~ Journalist, Potential Candidate
Mel Carnahan ~ Democratic Governor of Missouri
Col. James E. Sabow ~ Whistleblower and Marine
Col. Ted Westhusing ~ Returning home from Iraq
Gary Caradori ~ investigating the Franklin Cover Up
Nancy Schaefer ~ Georgia State Senator
Raymond Lemme ~ Election Integrity
Officer Terrance Yeakey ~ Oklahoma City Bombing
Vicki Morgan ~ Reagan era call girl
Dag Hammarskjöld ~ UN Secretary-General

Danny Jowenko?

Car crash on a village highway.

Some make the connection that it was three days after Dr. Alan Sabrosky mentioned Jowenko in an interview expressing 9/11 skepticism on PressTV.

One more - Senator Mark

One more - Senator Mark Dayton attempts to ask pertinent questions at the 9/11 Commission Report hearings, gets stonewalled, and then quickly leaves office. A later interviewee refers to Dayton receiving death threats after the hearings. I briefly posted about it here.

Re Goodman, giving her AE911 materials isn't going to tell her anything she didn't already know years ago. Blackly amusing to see Michael Moore do the foreward for her book as he has had on-camera discussions with 9/11 truth activists but has also ultimately recoiled at standing up and being counted. Post SICKO, pre CAPITALISM A LOVE STORY, Moore posted an article on his website stating that his next movie would cover incendiary political material "so toxic" that only 30% of the US population would be ready to follow it, and that it would provoke a bigger firestorm than anything he'd ever done, with no mention whatsoever of financial crimes, bailouts etc. Then Wall St crashed and Moore took on the bankers instead. No prizes for guessing the likely subject matter that Moore was carefully - probably nervously - considering at the time.

Good points and....

Michael Moore allows 9/11 Truth comments on his website:


Some people see the glass as half empty. Some people see the glass as half full. I assert to you the truth is that the glass is both half empty and half full.


Give me control of the issuance of a nations' money and I . . .

United States was free only until the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 when the International Bankers took over complete control of the production and distribution of our money. The Central Bank system throughout the world is fractional reserve fiat money-as-debt. Mayor Amsel Bauer (Rothschild) knew that whomever controlled the money controlled it all. By all I mean the political parties and the entire political system, they control the militaries and the inteligence agencies. The events of 9/11 were no doubt of great benefit to the interconnected corporate boards dominated by the money as debt banksters. Israel's hand is all over 9/11, not Jews, but radical Israel-first nationalists in Israel, Britian and the US. The oil barons and the military have a symbiotic relationship and 9/11 allowed them access to the Caspian oil and gas fields. The oil barons are in Afghanistan building the pipelines and are in Iraq and Azerbaijan stealing oil. The reason the Truth about 9/11 is systematically suppressed is that the media moguls are either radical Zionists or are loyal to Zionists or Zionists causes. The worst thing that can happen to Judaism is radical Zionism because so many people are not able to discern the difference between a religion and a radical supra-nationalist ideology. We need to Take Back The Media.

Who Runs America...

Who Runs America?

“The real truth of the matter is, and you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. Since the days of Andrew Jackson.” Franklin Roosevelt in a letter to Edward M. House (President Wilson’s closest aide), dated November 23, 1933.

Michael Scheuer Israel owns the Congress.

Is this video proof...

Is this video proof that there were explosives in the Twin Towers on 9/11. At 0:31 look at the corner of the building, there are explosions running down the FAR RIGHT side ahead of the collapse.

That is a really great video

I have seen videos from the same viewpoint but I'm not sure I've seen that zoom-in before.

I believe some clips David Chandler uses also clearly show the dust jets running in sequence down the building, ahead of the destruction wave. It looks like this picture has been sharpened and with higher contrast for more dramatic visibility.

more angles

Orangutan's video needs to shown

Orangutan's video is as good as anything I've seen. This video needs to be shown, along with WTC7 vids, to as many people as possible.

If people watch this video, and are told what to look for (the explosions leading the way down the north tower), they will *see*.

In a Seattle presentation by AE911Truth, Richard Gage showed similar footage, but Orangutan's seems clearer. The one presently linked to is really undeniable.