Abby Martin Calls Out Rachel Maddow For Painting 9/11 Truthers As Potential Terrorist

Abby Martin Calls Out Rachel Maddow For Painting 9/11 Truthers As Potential Terrorist

Published on Aug 9, 2013

August 09, 2013 Russia Today News

LIKE Breaking the Set @
FOLLOW Abby Martin @

Oliver Stone's Son Says 9/11 Was 'Inside Job'

Nice job, Abby! Also on RT:

Thanks for posting

I followed this post to here:


After about 12 minutes Sean Stone states that an FBI agent told him personally that 9-11 was an inside job, basically a magic trick.

Thanks for that one, Abby.

Appropriate and timely commentary from Abby Martin indeed. Ms. Maddow demonstrates callous disregard for the 9/11 victims and contempt for accuracy in broadcasting by whoring for the status quo, despite her certain awareness that she is promoting lies, corruption, complicity, alongside death and destruction overseas.

thanks guys!

post my version instead!:

Thank you!


Hi Abby :-)

I was just sussing out 911blogger after about 18 months not being here and I see this piece along with Kevin's latest. Awesome work from you both, thank you for the effort you continue to put in while so many of us have become silent...or at least quieter...

Kind regards John

PS- To think my blog here was the most popular seems like a dream now...huh...

Who is she anyway?

I've never seen her show. Someone posted a thread here not too long ago about her promotion of the 9/11 Commission comic book - a book which was obviously not intended to be hilarious, but of course ends up being so.

It sounds like she's a new mouthpiece for the new fake left or self-described "liberal" constituency in America. What a psychopath.


It also looks like, with the pending ReThink 9/11 ad campaign, as well as increased awareness of credible 9/11 skepticism in mainstream and technical journals, the war on 9/11 Truth is being stepped up a few notches.

Let's remember to keep our cool and stay on message. :)

New Fake Left, I love it.

Rachel Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar and an Oxford graduate. This highly educated woman should know better than to be promoting a comic book as it goes against type. However she may be on to something as Science Daily and The Wall St. Journal point out, Americans don't have a grasp of basic Science. "Only 53% of adults know how long it takes for the Earth to revolve around the Sun.
Only 59% of adults know that the earliest humans and dinosaurs did not live at the same time.
Only 47% of adults can roughly approximate the percent of the Earth's surface that is covered with water.*
Only 21% of adults answered all three questions correctly. (Science Daily)

Terrorists protected by Ignorance

This reminds me of a similar, equally shocking poll conducted by National Geographic around the time of the build up to the Iraq war, 2002/2003 - the questionnaire was addressed to young adults of high school graduation age, and if I recall correctly, two of the (many) questions were (1) locate Iraq on a map of the middle east and (2) locate the Pacific Ocean on a globe. To the first question, over 80% failed and even more incredibly, re. the second question, almost 50% failed.... !!!

The point here, is that if there exists such an extraordinary degree of ignorance and lack of knowledge concerning the most basic kindergarten- level science and the nature of our surroundings, how in hell can the ranks of the pathetically ignorant and uneducated - having consuming a diet of government/media sponsored pabulum, propaganda and lies - be expected to understand how the official story of how the Twin Towers and WTC7 were destroyed has to be bogus? The official version of that part of the 9/11 story violates 5 laws of classical physics, namely Newton's 3 laws of motion, the law of conservation of momentum and the 2nd law of thermodynamics. All this, of course, is the most elementary basic physics, but if half the population don't understand what "one year" is, and are unable to locate the Pacific Ocean, Earth's largest geographical feature - then such concepts such as "the behavior of falling objects", "equilibrium", and the "propagation/conductance of heat", as examples, would likely be viewed as "far out" and beyond comprehension, relevance or something like: "don't give me that élitist science crap, I want to know who won the game last night, or what Kim Kardashian's wearing.. etc". (!)

This appalling lack of awareness and basic education in such a wide base of the public can only be viewed as favorable and fortunate to those who are invested in keeping the facts and true nature of 9/11 bottled up. There is a quote, attributed to Adolf Hitler: "What luck for rulers than men do not think". He was undoubtedly speaking for himself and the ruling Nazi party, but the quote is just as apt today, and it is the likes of Ms. Maddow, who by jumping upon the bandwagon of ignorance to promote books written by both herself and others, is in actuality protecting those same terrorists, whoever they may be, who killed 3000 of our people almost 12 years ago.

What a disgusting example of humankind, being that she is highly educated and clearly knows, first hand, that she is perpetrating lies in return for a fat salary. Shame on her and a pox on her employers and publisher.


Really, half couldn't locate the Pacific Ocean on a globe?? I assume you're talking about American young adults here. They only care about themselves with few exceptions. Mindless materialism and obsession with people like Jay Z and Kim K. They can't even walk across a parking lot without texting! Or drive without texting. And they have no vocabulary -- they pride themselves in being stupid. They have access to more information than ever before, and they are less informed than any American generation in a century.

Young adults were the counterculture in the Vietnam era and very informed and politically active. Of course the draft and civil rights were a big factor. Maybe young Americans can still be reached, but we've got to explain to them how 9/11 and the WOT affects them.

EDIT: Let me say that if 'young adults' means people in their 20s, there are some examples of individuals doing outstanding work. Tyrell Ventura and Sean Stone, for example. And many former leaders of OWS. One of the leading voices in the movement to label GMOs is a 14 year old girl. So while this generation deserves criticism, we must also give credit where it's due. Encourage and accentuate the positive.

My response to Maddow before...

seeking people to monitor gatekeepers

As public outreach team leader at AE911Truth, I am seeking people to join a new team that will monitor various major gatekeeper shows and blogs, both liberal and conservative, so that we have individuals each monitoring one show or blog with team members being available to weigh in in a timely fashion when alerted. We want people who know how to AVOID flaming and stick to the evidence without accusing adversaries of bad faith. Call me, David Slesinger, 410-499-5403, or email me,

Tyrel Ventura Takes Rachel Maddow To Task

Tyrel Ventura Takes Rachel Maddow To Task

Published on Aug 13, 2013

Rachel Maddow recently had some harsh criticism for people she labelled as conspiracy theorists. We look at the video and Tyrel Ventura responds to her in this clip from Buzzsaw.

William Schaap on The Media, CIA, FBI & Disinfo.

William Schaap in the Youtube playlist linked below was testifying for the plaintiffs, The King family, in the civil suit they brought in 1999 in Tennessee against Loyd Jowers and other un-named co-conspirators for the wrongful death of Martin Luther KIng. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the King family, ie. accepting the arguments of the King's lawyer, William Pepper, that MLK died as a result of a conspiracy on the part of Loyd Jowers and some "government agencies." Both the King family and their attorney believed that James Earl Ray was only a patsy designated to take the fall for the assassination, but in reality had no direct part in the killing of MLK.

Anyhow, Schaap's testimony at that trial on how government disinformation campaigns and propaganda efforts are assisted and reinforced with the connivance of mainstream media seems to be relevant in the context of this thread.

From the Youtube blurb:

William Schaap gives expert, informed testimony on the US Government's use of the media to disseminate disinformation via the FBI and CIA.

William Schaap. Attorney. Graduated from the University of Chicago Law School in 1964. Has been a practicing lawyer since then. A member of the bar of the State of New York and of the District of Columbia. Specialized in the 1970's in military law. Practiced military law in Asia and Europe. later became the editor in chief of the Military Law Reporter in Washington for a number of years. In the 70's and 80's he was a staff counsel of the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York City. In the late 1980's was an adjunct professor at John J. College of Criminal Justice of the City University of New York where I taught courses on propaganda and disinformation.

Since 1977 or '78, in addition to being a practicing lawyer, was a journalist and a publisher and a writer specializing in intelligence-related matters and particularly their relationship to the media. For more than 20 years he has been the co-publisher of a magazine called the Covert Action Quarterly which particularly deals with reporting on intelligence agencies, primarily U.S. agencies but also foreign.
He published a magazine for a number of years called Lies Of Our Times which specifically was a magazine about propaganda and disinformation. Also he has been the managing director of the Institute for Media Analysis for a number of years. For about 20 years he was one of the principals in a publishing company called Sheraton Square Press that published books and pamphlets relating to intelligence and the media.

He has written dozens of articles on -- particularly on media and intelligence and edited about seven or eight books on the subject. He has contributed sections to a number of other books and has had many of his articles, appear in other publications around the world including New York Times, Washington Post and major media outlets.

Look at that screen shot.....

Look at that screen shot of Maddow above, she looks like she has a messianic complex. I think she is losing the plot! I heard her read and stumble through a treatise to prove some arcane point, not long ago. The piece was written in PhD-ese and the language was more appropriate for a dissertation than a light-breezy show where comic books are written. Has anyone noticed how she struggles with terminal consonants by they way and they come off as quite guttural, like comiCK BooCK; that is not very professional.